Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

If The Armenian Nation Wants To Survive, It Needs Something Like Sar

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • If The Armenian Nation Wants To Survive, It Needs Something Like Sar

    IF THE ARMENIAN NATION WANTS TO SURVIVE, IT NEEDS SOMETHING LIKE SARDARAPAT
    by David Stepanyan

    arminfo
    Wednesday, September 28, 14:00

    ArmInfo's interview with Zhirayr Sefilyan, hero of the Karabakh war,
    member of the initiative group of Sardarapat Movement

    In your latest interviews you have repeatedly predicted a sooner
    collapse of the Third Republic of Armenia and establishment of the
    Fourth Republic...

    Being convinced of the full exhaustiveness of the Third Republic of
    Armenia, which resembles a marasmic old man despite its 20-year age,
    we are sure that it will collapse in the near future. And pretty soon
    all of us will witness this event. However, the main thing is to create
    the basis of the new Fourth Republic of Armenia not to remain under the
    ruins of the Third Republic. Sardarapat Movement is currently creating
    the necessary basis though many of our compatriots are unaware of
    the core of our activities. At the moment we are working with the
    Armenian intellectuals in both Armenia and Diaspora, as we attach
    much importance to the people of Diaspora, who are not indifferent
    to Armenia's fate. We do our best to involve them in the forthcoming
    building of the new statehood of Armenia. Much work is being done
    with the Armenian youth, which has a huge potential. At the same time,
    is not going to create a youth wing. On the contrary, the youth will
    take an equal part in all initiatives of Sardarapat. Our goal is to
    create a strong youth core, which would be afraid to act independently
    and assume responsibility and the initiative if necessary. Our
    generation should become a kind of bridge to involve the youth in
    active political activities in the qualitatively new political field
    we are creating. This means that we do not imagine radical changes
    without the participation, energy and ideas of our youth.

    Let's speak of the possible ways to achieve the Movement's goals...

    Today we have been drawing out the long-term actions program,
    which covers the period of 40 years at least. The most important
    in this program will be not how we shall get rid of the regime but
    what we shall do after that. The Armenian society should strictly
    know that in a very short period of time Armenia will be put to the
    rails of fast development. We understand very well that Armenia is
    not Switzerland, that we are not in the center of Europe. We have a
    very small period of time to increase the quality of our new state
    for many times. We are simply sentenced to it - to have high quality
    when having small sizes. We believe that in Armenia elections cannot
    result in qualitative changes as they are always falsified. Those
    planning to run in the next elections are either naive or just tools
    in the regime's hands. The bog you call a political field is fully
    controlled by the regime.

    What is the way out of that bog?

    The only way-out of this situation is a new political field controlled
    by new rules rather than the regime. It is the opposition's fault
    that the regime is still existent. They have failed to consolidate
    the people that were able to change something. Today, our politicians
    are more like traders, pursuing only personal interests. Sardarapat
    is going to put an end to political Bacchanalia in Armenia with the
    help of a group of intellectuals rather than one leader. We have the
    necessary human resources for creating such a group. As soon as we
    gather them, we will urge people to go into the streets so as to get
    rid of the regime.

    What is the fundamental difference between Sardarapat and other
    opposition forces in this context?

    The main difference between Sardarapat and other oppositional forces
    is that we will not urge people to hold protest actions in order to
    overthrow the power and only after that to decide what to do next.

    Sardarapat clearly realizes its further actions. Both in Tunisia and
    Egypt the people managed to get rid of the ruling regimes, but the
    question what to do next still hangs in the air. It is very important
    to know for what sake everything should be changed, and when people
    know and understand the prospects, they will realize that they should
    start the struggle for the substantial future. Such an explosion
    already occurred on 1 March 2008, when the people demonstrated that
    they were not going to put up with the tyranny. Sardarapat has always
    appreciated the qualities of Armenian people, but this explosion
    occurred for the sake of changes. He thinks that Armenia has been
    under the power of authoritarian regime over the past 20 years with
    few exceptions. I wouldn't say that we manage to do everything or that
    we are content with everything, but our work over the past 1.5 years
    has already given and is still giving the first results. If earlier
    we were looking for people to involve them in our initiative group,
    now the people themselves join us. Internet gives us an excellent
    opportunity to break through the information blockade.

    Taking into account the fact that overwhelming majority of Armenians
    lives abroad, Sardarapat will manage to gain big results in unifying
    the compatriots in both Armenia and Diaspora thanks to the internet.

    You have repeatedly mentioned the potential and possibilities of
    Diaspora. Why does it is still unclaimed? Do the threats and risks
    overwhelm the perspectives?

    Since 1991 the Armenian authorities have been trying hard to sow
    discord between Armenia and the Diaspora. Their principle was "Let's
    Give Armenia to Armenia and Diaspora to Diaspora." This principle
    has already become a

    Stereotype. The problem of the Armenian authorities is that they have
    the mentality of slaves and have never believed in the capacities of
    the Diaspora and have never planned to create a strong Armenian state.

    Their only plan was to retain their throne. If the Armenian nation
    wants to survive, it needs something like Sardarapat. Today our
    compatriots abroad have already realized that there is no statehood
    in their homeland, and they are also responsible for this situation.

    Nevertheless, parliamentary elections are coming. What political
    situation do you expect after the elections?

    The risk of social explosion is still existent in Armenia, but there
    will hardly be a revolt after the parliamentary elections 2012. Those
    elections will be very much like the previous ones. The regime will
    once again try to diffuse the opposition and to reshape the political
    field the way it likes.

    More details please...

    The developments in the Middle East have created an unpredictable
    situation. Even the leading institutions and analytical centers of
    the world refuse to make any forecasts on this situation. In this
    situation everything may happen in Armenia. If Turkey is allowed to
    invade Syria, Lord forbid, this will inevitably have a bad effect on
    Armenia. However, I am sure that not a single Armenian politician
    has thought what may happen to Armenia in this case. History likes
    to reoccur, and the situation in the region resembles the situation
    100 years ago. If the Turkish troops invade Syria under the guise
    of liberators of Syrian people, Turkey's image in the region and
    in the Arab world will considerably grow. The Turkish policy of
    Neo-Ottomanism, by which Ankara is trying to raise its significance
    as a regional power, is conditioned by the elementary self-protection
    instinct.

    If Turkey fails to shortly take serious steps beyond its borders,
    the collapse of Turkey will be inevitable. At the same time, he thinks
    that today it is much easier to control Turkey than it was during the
    Ottoman Empire 100 years ago. This performance, Sefilyan said, is aimed
    at creating a new influential state with Islamic ideology in the person
    of Turkey, as a counterweight to Iran. This is the task of the West,
    and this process is not new. It has been going on for about 100 years,
    but it has recently become more intensive. Therefore, a force -majeur
    is not ruled out and we must be ready for any developments.

Working...
X