Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

BAKU: Former Bush Administration Official Michael Rubin Comments On

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • BAKU: Former Bush Administration Official Michael Rubin Comments On

    FORMER BUSH ADMINISTRATION OFFICIAL MICHAEL RUBIN COMMENTS ON AZERBAIJANI-ISRAELI RELATIONS

    Turan
    April 2, 2012

    WASHINGTON, DC. March 30, 2012: TURAN's Washington, DC correspondent
    Alakbar Raufoglu interviewed Michael Rubin, a resident scholar at
    the American Enterprise Institute who worked as a Pentagon adviser
    on Iran and Iraq during the first administration of George W. Bush:

    According to the new article at the Foreign Policy, Israel has gained
    access to airfields in Azerbaijan near Iran borders, which it could
    use to make more feasible its attack on Iran. So, if these new reports
    are correct, then "the United States now believes that Israel has been
    granted access to air bases in Azerbaijan"- what does it mean? Why
    Azerbaijan? Taking into consideration that Azerbaijan - which shares
    a long border with Iran, is also threatened by Iran's nukes.

    First, it's important to consider the source: The article was written
    by Mark Perry who, like Seymour Hersh, has a habit of exaggerating.

    But, Israel and Azerbaijan have long had strong relations for
    practical reasons: They both faced invasion by hostile powers upon
    their independence, and they continue to face neighbors who seek to
    undermine their stability.

    It is in Azerbaijan's interests to cultivate relations with the
    outside world if nothing else than to preserve its independence. This
    is a common strategy among small states surrounded by much larger
    countries. Kuwait, for example, has always maintained its freedom by
    refusing to accept the dictates of Saudi Arabia, Iran, or Iraq. Qatar,
    too, has maintained its independence by refusing to be either a Saudi
    or Iranian puppet-even establishing informal relations with Israel.

    In comparison, Armenia has allowed itself to become a virtual satellite
    of Russia and Wikileaks documents also show how it has subordinated
    itself to Iranian interests. It has lost much of its independence
    and is distrusted in the West.

    Ultimately, the only way for Azerbaijan to maintain the respect of
    Iran is to be independent of it and if that requires maintaining strong
    relations with Israel and the United States, as far as I'm concerned,
    that's great for Washington and good for Baku.

    There are some reports in the Israel media claiming the US is leaking
    this classified information in order to dissuade Israel. So why is the
    US doing that? Is Israel does take advantage of Azerbaijani airfields,
    what is that mean for the US?

    The distrust between the United States and Israel has not been this low
    since the Eisenhower administration in the 1950s. The Israelis suspect
    that the Obama administration has reconciled itself to a nuclear Iran
    and that if they forewarn the Americans of any military strike on
    Iran, the White House will leak word and undercut the surprise upon
    which the Israelis depend. The Obama administration, meanwhile, fears
    that an Israeli strike will be a strategic disaster, and would raise
    the price of oil in the run-up to the November elections. If Israel
    were able to access the Azerbaijani airfields, Israel would be able
    to strike deep into Iran with greater surprise and with less need
    for refueling. If the Obama administration or the U.S. intelligence
    community did leak word of secret Israel-Azerbaijan dealings, then
    the purpose was to make it harder for Israel to act with surprise
    and to increase Iranian pressure on Azerbaijan.

    Regardless of their accuracy, such leaks are a betrayal of
    U.S.-Azerbaijan trust and inexcusable.

    Baku officials say the country will never allow use its territory
    against Iran. Some believe that these whole is about arming Azerbaijan
    for a looming "next war" with Armenia and providing them deterrence
    against Iranian meddling with their internal affairs. Then it's
    about Israel improving its tactical capabilities vis-a-vis an Iranian
    strike...

    That may very well be a more plausible explanation. The Armenians
    receive assistance from Iran, and so it would make sense if
    Azerbaijan could access Israeli weaponry and training. Clearly,
    neither Armenia nor Russia are sincere about ending the occupation
    of Nagorno-Karabakh. Turkey is occupied elsewhere, and so it makes
    perfect sense for Azerbaijan to reach out to friends to right a wrong
    that Azerbaijan has suffered for two decades (Turan).

Working...
X