Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Is There Still Life Left In The Turkey-Armenia Protocols?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Is There Still Life Left In The Turkey-Armenia Protocols?

    IS THERE STILL LIFE LEFT IN THE TURKEY-ARMENIA PROTOCOLS?
    Joshua Kucera

    EurasiaNet.org
    April 17 2012
    NY

    After Turkey and Armenia signed historic protocols in 2009 to
    normalize relations and reopen the border between the two countries,
    the reconciliation process between the two countries quickly stalled.

    As my colleague Yigal Schleiffer wrote, "not much longer after
    they were signed, the agreement was as good as dead, killed off
    by a combination of Turkish buyer's remorse, Azeri bullying and
    Armenian naivete." A thorough report on the history of the diplomatic
    reconciliation process, by David Phillips, a scholar who has long
    experience working in Turkish-Armenian relations, concluded that the
    protocols were in fact effectively dead.

    But Phillips spoke Tuesday in Washington, and said he is now more
    optimistic about the protocols' prospects than he was when he
    finished that report last month. Recent trips to Ankara and Yerevan
    and conversations with diplomats in both places gave him new reason
    for hope, and he said he now wanted to "disassociate himself" from
    the pessimistic conclusion he gave in his report.

    "Based on the meetings I had recently in Turkey and Armenia, I still
    believe that elements of the protocol represent the way forward," he
    said. Until recently, Phillips said, he had thought that the Turkish
    side was committed to prolonging an unproductive debate about the
    historical record of the Armenian genocide, and that Armenia would
    never ratify the documents even if Turkey did, "But it's my belief
    now that the possibility still exists for that to happen, for the
    Turks to recognize that, with the centennial [of the 1915 genocide]
    approaching, that it is in their interest to make policy to ratify
    the protocols, or to take steps short of that, through an executive
    order to simply establish diplomatic relations and open the border
    for normal travel and trade."

    Also providing room for optimism, Phillips said, was Prime Minister
    Recep Tayyip Erdogan's groundbreaking apology for a massacre of Kurds
    in the 1930s. Erdogan was one of the "villains" of the failure of
    the protocol, Phillips said, for linking the issue of the disputed
    Azerbaijani territory of Nagorno Karabakh to the Turkey-Armenia
    protocols. Diplomats on both sides had labored mightily to keep
    the intractable Karabakh conflict out of the intractable-enough
    Turkey-Armenia reconciliation process, and Erdogan sabotaged that,
    Phillips said. But the apology for the massacre at Dersim suggests
    Erdogan could be changing, Phillips said:

    "To me [this] shows something in his character that I didn't think
    he had, which is the ability to apologize. And I know from my own
    experience working in conflicts ... that apologizing can be kind
    of catchy. Once you apologize for something, it becomes easier
    to apologize for something else. So it's still my hope that, as a
    humanitarian gesture based on Islamic principles, that Prime Minister
    Erdogan will issue an apology for what happened to the Armenians and
    will submit the protocols for ratification or, via executive order,
    normalize relations and open the border for normal travel and trade."

    Phillips is deeply involved in this process, and so if he has reason
    for optimism, then perhaps the rest of us should, too.




    From: A. Papazian
Working...
X