Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Book Review: The Sandcastle girls: witnesses to the unknown slaughte

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Book Review: The Sandcastle girls: witnesses to the unknown slaughte

    The National, UAE
    Aug 17 2012

    The Sandcastle girls: witnesses to the unknown slaughter

    Fran Hawthorne
    Aug 18, 2012


    Addressing her readers, Laura Petrosian, one of three narrators of the
    new novel The Sandcastle Girls, wryly calls the mass murder of
    Armenians by Turkey in 1915 and 1916 "the Slaughter You Know Next to
    Nothing About". Even though she is the granddaughter of a survivor of
    that slaughter, Laura herself has been raised in the US knowing next
    to nothing about it. She only begins to research this controversial
    piece of Middle East history after she stumbles upon a photograph of
    her grandfather's first wife, an Armenian who died during those
    horrific times.

    The Sandcastle Girls - the 15th book by the bestselling American
    author Chris Bohjalian, who is himself of Armenian descent - thus aims
    to be more than a typical historical novel. Certainly, it has the
    basic elements of the historical genre: romance, drama, anguish,
    separated lovers, long dresses, family secrets, the sweep of war and a
    dual past-present narrative structure. But Laura (and presumably
    Bohjalian) also wants to shake readers' consciences.

    Especially as the book goes on and Laura's knowledge expands, the
    preaching becomes increasingly explicit. The US consul in Aleppo in
    1915, Ryan Martin, despairingly tells one character, "The [Armenian]
    race is dying ... The proportions are positively biblical ... It's a level
    of barbarism that is unimaginable outside of literature".

    Can a casual holiday-time novel coexist with such a sobering
    investigation? It's a worthy effort. The Sandcastle Girls is hardly
    great literature but it succeeds well enough for what it is.

    The book is built around the intertwined tales of two generations of
    the Petrosian family. Chronologically, it starts with Elizabeth
    Endicott, the daughter of an upper-class banker from Boston, who
    arrives in Aleppo in 1915, freshly graduated from an exclusive women's
    college and imbued with philanthropic zeal. She has travelled with her
    father and a missionary convoy to bring food and medical supplies to
    Armenian refugees who have been deported across the desert.

    In Aleppo, Elizabeth meets and falls in love with Armen Petrosian, a
    young Armenian engineer whose brother, infant daughter and wife - the
    wife in the modern-day photo - have been killed or otherwise
    brutalised by the Turks. However, Armen doesn't stay long in the city.
    Haunted by the loss of his family, thirsting for revenge against the
    Turkish friend who betrayed him and feeling like a coward for avoiding
    battle, he sets off to join the British army in the doomed Gallipoli
    campaign.

    But Armen's and Elizabeth's granddaughter Laura, the contemporary
    narrator - a novelist, wife and mother living in a wealthy suburb of
    New York City - knows little of that history or culture, beyond an
    occasional treat of dried Armenian basturma meat and a few ornamental
    shisha pipes scattered around her grandparents' house. She doesn't
    even know that Armen was married once before.

    Nor do her grandparents seem particularly interested in passing down
    any ancestral customs. "They kept their distance from many other
    Armenians with whom they might have been friends," Laura recalls, "and
    they seemed to give the Armenian Church a particularly wide berth."

    Laura's father - their son - marries a non-Armenian, as does Laura.
    She even dates a boy of Turkish ancestry for a while. The Petrosian
    family is a sterling example of the clichéd American melting pot.

    The photo of Armen's mysterious first wife, in an article in The
    Boston Globe newspaper about a new museum exhibit, finally stirs
    Laura's curiosity. When she goes to see the exhibit, the curator shows
    her a cache of letters and diaries from her grandparents - papers that
    tell the story in the other part of this novel.

    Not surprisingly, the century-old story is far more compelling than
    the contemporary one. After all, the life-and-death stakes are higher.
    Armen hides from Turkish soldiers, nearly starves in the desert and
    leaps on to a moving train in his effort to reach the British army.
    The Endicotts and their caravan of supplies are robbed at gunpoint.
    Two German soldiers risk a court martial for treason every time they
    surreptitiously photograph some of the Armenian refugees.

    Even if Armen can safely make his way back to Aleppo, Elizabeth will
    have to overcome her father's class and ethnic prejudice in order to
    marry him. She has already annoyed her father by spurning a marriage
    proposal from a proper young Boston banker and now a physician in
    their aid convoy is obviously hoping to fill that spot.

    Most important, though, is the historical backstory of the Turkish
    massacre of up to 1.5 million Armenians. There are atrocities of more
    sorts than most readers could probably imagine. The descriptions spare
    no senses or sensitivities. On their first day in Aleppo, the
    Endicotts are greeted by "a staggering column of old women" being
    herded through the town square by Turkish soldiers. "Their skin has
    been seared black by the sun or stained by the soil in which they have
    slept or, in some cases, by great yawning scabs and wounds that are
    open and festering and, even at this distance, malodorous. The women
    look like dying wild animals as they lurch forward." And that is one
    of the mildest examples.

    Of course, this is fiction. But it is based on historical research. In
    the acknowledgements, the author cites about one dozen books and major
    articles that he consulted, as well as academics, librarians and other
    experts. Even allowing for some exaggeration and poetic licence, the
    pile-up of brutality is so overwhelming that it is hard not to call it
    by that fraught term, genocide - "acts committed with the intent to
    destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnic, racial or religious
    group", as defined by the UN Convention on Genocide.

    There are chilling foretastes, too, of the looming, far more infamous
    genocide - the Nazis' attempt to murder all the Jews of Europe. At one
    point, scores of Armenians are wedged into railway freight carriages,
    where they "would stand for hours like cattle, unable to move or raise
    their arms". Twenty-five years later, Jews would be forced into
    similarly inhumane cattle cars.

    Bohjalian makes an effort to be even-handed, giving intelligent Turks
    and their German allies a couple of opportunities to state their case.
    "These people are in a brutal struggle with the Russians," one German
    officer explains of the Turks. "And the Armenians are doing all that
    they possibly can to undermine their own nation's efforts." Moreover,
    the cast includes a few sympathetic Turks and Germans who are troubled
    by the atrocities, such as the Turkish doctor treating Armenian
    victims in the Aleppo hospital. "He is convinced that a righteous God
    is going to make the Turks pay for what they are doing. 'Allah dwells
    in all men, even the infidel,' he says."

    The modern-day plot also offers a few multicultural complexities. For
    instance, soon after Laura starts dating her Turkish-American
    boyfriend, Berk, her father asks her, "So Berk. Your new friend. Have
    you wondered how his grandparents and yours would have got along?"
    Laura's twin brother provides the answer: "Berk's family would have
    either killed Grandpa or hidden him. But probably killed him."

    Judged purely on its literary merits, The Sandcastle Girls handles its
    complex structure deftly, but it falls flat on character development,
    particularly with the 1915 characters, who are pretty much all noble
    or all mean. The writing is functional, rolling along so easily as to
    be unremarkable for most of the book and turning vivid in the battle
    scenes in Gallipoli. Bohjalian deserves credit for taking on the
    voices of not just one, but two female narrators, Laura and Elizabeth.
    However, Laura's voice doesn't fit the novel's hybrid personality.
    While her ironically self-aware tone is certainly a common one in
    modern literature, and enjoyable in the right circumstances, it is
    utterly incompatible with the horrors she is describing. The
    sandcastle motif also seems forced, with examples of castle-building
    occasionally wedged into the plot mainly, it would seem, to buttress
    the title. Still, such literary criticism is really secondary. Laura
    and Bohjalian are right: this is a slaughter that readers ought to
    know more about.

    The reason for teaching and reteaching this message is not to enable
    the US or France to pass resolutions condemning Armenian genocide (as
    those governments periodically consider), thereby enraging Turkey. On
    the contrary, the world has too many diplomatic kerfuffles as it is.
    But each generation needs to be reminded of the inhumanity of which
    our ancestors were capable - and not all that long ago - in the hope
    that someday, perhaps, future generations will stop repeating it.
    Poetic licence or not, fiction can often get that message across
    better than dry history texts.

    Fran Hawthorne is an award- winning US-based author and journalist who
    specialises in covering the intersection of business, finance and
    social policy.

    http://www.thenational.ae/arts-culture/books/the-sandcastle-girls-witnesses-to-the-unknown-slaughter#full

Working...
X