Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

The Many Armenian Diasporas, Then and Now

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • The Many Armenian Diasporas, Then and Now

    GEOCurrents
    The Peoples, Places & Languages Shaping Current Events


    The Many Armenian Diasporas, Then and Now

    Written by Martin W. Lewis on February 6, 2012


    Wikipedia map of the recent Armenian DiasporaArmenians have long been
    scattered over many countries, whether as permanent migrants or
    temporary sojourners. Today, only about a third of their population
    lives in Armenia, with the rest spread over a wide area, as can be
    seen on the map posted here. This pattern largely reflects the
    movements caused by deadly mass expulsions of the early 20th century
    that most scholars call the Armenian Genocide. As a result, standard
    reference sources on the "Armenian Diaspora" focus on the deadly
    Ottoman deportations into the Levant and the subsequent dispersion of
    survivors to the far reaches of the world. But earlier Armenian
    diasporas had completely different geographies that were of great
    historical significance. Today only vestiges of the earlier movements
    remain, yet at the same time new patterns are emerging as Armenians
    once again leave their homeland in large numbers. The Armenian
    diaspora, it would seem, is always in flux.

    One change over the past few decades has been the reduction of the
    once sizable Armenia communities in the Middle East generated by the
    Ottoman expulsions. Lebanon is the key locale here, still hosting some
    150,000 Armenians, or about four percent of the national
    population. Before the Lebanese Civil War of the late 1970s and `80s,
    the community was substantially larger. But despite its recent
    decline, the Beirut community remains culturally vibrant, publishing
    three Armenian-language daily newspapers. Each paper is linked to a
    different Armenian political party, typifying the fractious and
    sectarian nature of Lebanese politics.

    Modified Wikipedia map of the Armenian Kingdom of Cilicia, Circa 1200
    CEHistorically speaking, the Armenians are no strangers to mass
    deportations and refugee crises. Robin Cohen traces the Armenian
    "victim diaspora" back to the actions of the East Roman Emperor
    Maurice, who resettled Armenians in Cyprus and Macedonia in 578 CE.*
    The Seljuk Turkish invasion of the Armenian homeland in the eleventh
    century resulted in a much larger refugee flow. Many settled in
    Cilicia in what is now south-central Turkey. There they built their
    own kingdom, which emerged as a fairly powerful state called Cilician
    Armenia (or Little Armenia) in the 1200s. After Cilician Armenia fell
    to the Mamluks of Egypt in late 1300s, the more prosperous members of
    the community fled to the cities and towns of Europe. Central and
    Eastern Europe were major destinations. Poland-Lithuania, desperate to
    populate its vast expanse, welcomed many. So did Hungary and the
    Romanian principalities. So many migrants settled in the Transylvanian
    city of Gherla that it became known as "Armenian-town" (Armenopolis,
    Armenierstadt or, in Armenian, Hayakaghak). As late as 1850, Gherla
    had an Armenian majority; subsequently, most of the community was
    assimilated into the Magyar (Hungarian) population.

    Modified Wikipedia map of Armenians in Transylvania 1850But not all
    Armenian mass movements were "victim diaporas." When historians of the
    early modern period discuss the Armenian diaspora, they usually have
    in mind a dispersion rooted more in economic opportunity than
    political persecution. This Armenian "trade diaspora," based on
    long-distance exchange across nodes of ethnic kin, was vast,
    stretching the breadth of Eurasia. When European adventurers first
    reached such seemingly isolated states as Tibet and Ethiopia
    (Abyssinia) they found prosperous Armenian outposts. Such settlements
    were sometimes founded on trade in highly specific commodities. The
    Armenians of Tibet, for example, dealt mainly in deer musk, a once
    precious substance used as a perfume fixative, incense ingredient, and
    medicine, and which was also thought to be an aphrodisiac.

    This early modern Armenian mercantile diaspora was largely voluntary,
    but it did include some episodes of coercion. In 1606, Shah Abbas I of
    Safavid Persia forcibly deported** tens of thousands of Armenians from
    his empire's contested border zone with the Ottomans. The shah
    recognized the economic potential of the Armenians, and hoped to turn
    it to his own advantage. Resettled in New Julfa, a suburb of the
    Safavid capital of Isfahan, the Armenians were treated with toleration
    and encouraged to trade. Before long, the New Julfa merchants were
    carrying out most of Persia's vital silk trade, establishing outposts
    as far afield as Manila and southern China. The deep extent of the
    historical Armenian presence in Iran is evident in the large number of
    Persian loanwords in the Armenian language.

    The Safavid Empire was not the only major Muslim polity to want an
    Armenian presence. India's Mughal emperor Akbar invited Armenian
    merchants to settle in Agra in the late 1500s, offering substantial
    inducements: "By an imperial decree, Armenian merchants were exempted
    from paying taxes on the merchandise imported and exported by them,
    and they were also allowed to move around in the areas of the Mughal
    empire where entry of foreigners was otherwise prohibited." Many came,
    and the South Asian Armenian community thrived though the 1800s.

    In the twentieth century, most of the foreign outposts established by
    this early-modern Armenian system withered, undermined by modernizing
    trade and transportation practices and by the hardening of
    ethno-national lines. Most Asian-based Armenians again relocated,
    usually to the Western Hemisphere, Australia, or France. The Armenian
    community of India now numbers all of around 100, challenging the
    survival of such venerable cultural institutions as the Armenian
    College of Kolkata (Calcutta). A similar situation is found in
    Ethiopia, where the remaining Armenians struggle to support their
    school, church and social club. The Armenian population of Iran is
    more stable, numbering between 40,000 to a little more than
    100,000. Still, an estimated 350,000 "Armenian Iranians" now live
    abroad. In the Armenian communities of Europe, partial assimilation
    has generated a more ambiguous situation. Poland, site of one of the
    oldest diasporic communities, found only 1,082 Armenian residents in
    its 2002 census; some Armenian sources, however, claim that the actual
    number is closer to 100,000.

    While many foreign Armenian communities are disappearing, others are
    being replenished by emigration from Armenia itself. Since the late
    1980s, an estimated one million Armenians have moved abroad, fleeing
    the poverty of their homeland. Most have relocated to Russia, long a
    focus of Armenian dispersal. As a result, the population of Armenia
    itself has dropped substantially in recent years. Demographers
    estimate that 25,000 to 30,000 people permanently leave the country
    each year. In 2010, the United Nations Development Program (UNDP)
    officially advised the Armenian government to "improve the
    socioeconomic situation and strengthen the rule of law" in order to
    avoid further depopulation. Considering the fact that its total
    fertility rate is only about 1.5, Armenia's demographic future does
    seem grim.

    The current Armenian exodus has a distinct gender imbalance, with men
    predominating. In some rural areas, women now form a clear
    majority. As one local informant recently told a reporter, "It's a
    total matriarchate. We even joke that our village's name should be
    changed from `Canyon of Roses' to `Canyon of Women.'"
    Counterbalancing this trend has been a marked upturn since
    independence in the sex ratio at birth; far more Armenian boys are
    being born than girls. This trend is found throughout the southern
    Caucasus: Georgia, Armenia, and Azerbaijan now vie with northern India
    and eastern China for their natal sex imbalances. The exact reasons
    for this seldom-noted Caucasian phenomenon are not clear, although
    son-preference obviously plays a major role.

    * Robin Cohen, Global Diasporas: An Introduction. 1997. University of
    Washington Press, page 44).

    ** Persian sources often claim that the Armenians came on their own,
    fleeing persecution by the Ottoman authorities, but most historians
    doubt such accounts.

    http://geocurrents.info/place/russia-ukraine-and-caucasus/caucasus-series/the-many-armenian-diasporas-then-and-now#ixzz24ipLeP5w



    From: Emil Lazarian | Ararat NewsPress
Working...
X