Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

ANKARA: Remaining In Limbo

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • ANKARA: Remaining In Limbo

    REMAINING IN LIMBO
    by Sedat Laciner

    Star
    Aug 26 2012
    Turkey

    When the Ottoman Empire was disintegrated Turkey's most important
    problem had been its isolation. The "Ottoman family" no longer existed
    and the "Islamic world" had not yet become a family. The West in turn
    still looked at the Turks as a foreign entity. The West has never
    been able to take Turkey in. Even when it formed a bloc against the
    Soviet Union, the Turks had been abandoned in many cases. For example
    they had openly supported Greece in the Cyprus issue, even when the
    Turks were being massacred. Our allies France and Greece had provided
    shelter to Armenian terrorists. In short, Turkey's most important
    problem had been its isolation.

    With the 12 September coup our isolation had further intensified. When
    applying to the EEC [European Economic Community] for full membership
    Turgut Ozal had known in advance that we would not be accepted.

    Nonetheless he had not wanted to lose the "European anchor."

    Furthermore the Turkic republics that had emerged with the
    disintegration of the Soviet Union had excited him. He believed that
    he would find a solution to Turkey's isolation problem by means of
    relatives such as Azerbaijan and Kazakhstan. Relatives such as Bosnia
    and Albania that had appeared in the Balkans during the same period
    had also given Turkey hope.

    With the AKP [Justice and Development Party] governments Turkey
    intensified its efforts to become a full member in the EU as of 2002 on
    the one hand, while on the other it tried to break its isolation with
    its neighbours. Brotherhood was targeted especially in the ties with
    Iran, Iraq, and Syria. Unfortunately Turkey's approach which can be
    described as "naive" was greeted with certain unfortunate incidents,
    inefficiencies, and ulterior motives. First these efforts coincided
    with the invasion of Iraq. When Turkey rejected the 1 March [2003]
    motion [for the stationing of US troops in Turkey and the deployment
    of Turkish troops into northern Iraq] the United States started a
    period of punishing Turkey and the PKK [Kurdistan People's Congress,
    KGK] was once again inflicted upon us. As we have already said,
    "being deceived by allies" is not something new for Turkey.

    Worst of all is the fact that Ankara has been disappointed by Tehran.

    Rather than acting together with Turkey and the other Islamic
    countries the Iranians have acted alone, on the basis of their secret
    agenda. They lied both to Turkey and to the world with the aim of
    developing a nuclear bomb. Despite the fact that the PKK was a serious
    problem for Iran, Tehran refrained from cooperating with Turkey in this
    regard. Despite the fact that the ties between the United States and
    Turkey had been very bad between 2003 and 2007, the Iranians continued
    to see Turkey as the "West's spy" and as their biggest rival. During
    this period Iran exerted utmost efforts for preventing large Turkish
    companies from entering Iran. Turkey took fatal risks for Iran. It
    even defended Iran's nuclear programme. Ankara, together with Brazil,
    supported Iran by itself in the UN Security Council by itself, but
    Iran always remained the same. Therefore it is impossible to link
    the [crisis] that we are currently experiencing with Iran to the
    rapprochement of the ties between Turkey and the United States.

    Iran is still the old Iran.

    Things might have gone well in Syria but the economic inefficiency
    of the Syrians and their culture prevented the development of the ties.

    Even at its peak, the trade volume between Turkey and Syria could
    not exceed the trade volume between Turkey and Israel. Furthermore
    Russia and Iran which influenced Syria behind the scenes hindered
    the concretizing of the ties between the two countries. And today
    both Syria and Iran are supporting the PKK.

    President Abdullah Gul had warned at the time, saying: "Let us
    put our garden in order, otherwise someone will come and meddle in
    our garden." And this day has come. The Arab Spring has scattered
    the entire region about. Syria and Iran are next in line. Turkey,
    just like Saudi Arabia, has also determined its side in Syria: It
    is standing by the side of the United States. However the critical
    question at this point is as follows: Is the United States's side
    in Syria our side? I have serious hesitations at this point. Under
    normal circumstances comrades-in-arms are like brothers. A threat to
    one is also a threat to the other. However it is impossible to see
    this brotherhood in the war on the PKK. There is not much difference
    between Iran and the United States against the PKK.

    Of course, there is also the Israeli factor. Following the Mavi
    Marmara incident Israel is capable of drowning Turkey in a teaspoon
    of water. Nonetheless if Turkey were to declare war against Syria,
    this would have been the best solution for Israel. As you know,
    I wrote a year ago - in fact I had also written earlier - that it
    will be even sweeter for Israel if Turkey declares war against Iran.

    In short, Turkey's isolation continues. Regardless of what it does,
    it is not able to find true friends in its foreign relations. Maybe
    the fact that it is seeking friends is the real problem.

    [Translated from Turkish]

Working...
X