Tweet
BE CAREFUL AND THINK TWICE BEFORE GIVING THE CLOTHES TO DRY-CLEANING
Factinfo
Mon, 12/10/2012 - 12:14
Very often the citizens of our country are not careful when signing
contracts before using some services. They sign contracts without or
briefly reading them and afterwards get surprised when they appear
in the position of a victim.
The person who submitted a complaint to the Market Surveillance State
Inspectorate of the RA Ministry of Economy said that the size of the
female coat with the cost USD 5000 that was sent to dry-cleaning in
'Selena' LLC reduced. As a result of examination it was revealed
that the appearance of possible defects was indicated in the contract
signed between the citizen and the LLC. The applicant was suggested
to solve the matter by referring to the court.
However, there were cases when appearing in the position of a victim
was not connected with briefly or not reading the contract before
signing it. A while after the above-mentioned case, another citizen
that had submitted a complaint to the Inspectorate informed about a
poor quality service of the 'New-Shahab' dry-cleaning center by the
address G. Lusavorich, as a result of which the trousers with the
cost of AMD 65 thousand were damaged. The applicant was suggested to
solve the matter by referring to the court.
Let us note that in this case no warning of the possible damages of
the clothes was mentioned in the contract and could not be mentioned,
because in that case hardly anyone would agree to send their clothes
to dry-cleaning.
Thus, the mentioned Inspectorate neither denied the fact indicated
in the complaint nor protected the applicant's interests, but only
suggested referring to the court.
A similar complaint was received by the Market Surveillance State
Inspectorate on May 31 of the current year. The author of the complaint
informed about the poor quality dry-cleaning provided by the 'Elita'
dry-cleaning and laundry center by the address G. Chaush 50, 15th
district, Yerevan city. The applicant was once again suggested to
solve the matter by referring to the court, since the complaint does
not fall within the jurisdiction of the Inspectorate.
Artur Hovhannisyan Õ~@Õ¥Õ²Õ"Õ¶Õ¡Õ¯:
From: A. Papazian
Factinfo
Mon, 12/10/2012 - 12:14
Very often the citizens of our country are not careful when signing
contracts before using some services. They sign contracts without or
briefly reading them and afterwards get surprised when they appear
in the position of a victim.
The person who submitted a complaint to the Market Surveillance State
Inspectorate of the RA Ministry of Economy said that the size of the
female coat with the cost USD 5000 that was sent to dry-cleaning in
'Selena' LLC reduced. As a result of examination it was revealed
that the appearance of possible defects was indicated in the contract
signed between the citizen and the LLC. The applicant was suggested
to solve the matter by referring to the court.
However, there were cases when appearing in the position of a victim
was not connected with briefly or not reading the contract before
signing it. A while after the above-mentioned case, another citizen
that had submitted a complaint to the Inspectorate informed about a
poor quality service of the 'New-Shahab' dry-cleaning center by the
address G. Lusavorich, as a result of which the trousers with the
cost of AMD 65 thousand were damaged. The applicant was suggested to
solve the matter by referring to the court.
Let us note that in this case no warning of the possible damages of
the clothes was mentioned in the contract and could not be mentioned,
because in that case hardly anyone would agree to send their clothes
to dry-cleaning.
Thus, the mentioned Inspectorate neither denied the fact indicated
in the complaint nor protected the applicant's interests, but only
suggested referring to the court.
A similar complaint was received by the Market Surveillance State
Inspectorate on May 31 of the current year. The author of the complaint
informed about the poor quality dry-cleaning provided by the 'Elita'
dry-cleaning and laundry center by the address G. Chaush 50, 15th
district, Yerevan city. The applicant was once again suggested to
solve the matter by referring to the court, since the complaint does
not fall within the jurisdiction of the Inspectorate.
Artur Hovhannisyan Õ~@Õ¥Õ²Õ"Õ¶Õ¡Õ¯:
From: A. Papazian