Tweet
MEMORIES DIM OF ARMENIA'S SOVIET PAST
By Gayane Lazarian, Naira Melkumyan
Institute for War and Peace Reporting IWPR
January 4, 2012
UK
While younger people have little conception of life under communist
rule, some Armenians miss the positive things lost after the Soviet
collapse.
Two decades have passed since the Soviet flag was lowered over Armenia,
but Sedrak Mkhitaryan's hands still shake when he brings out the red
flags and Lenin medals he treasures from the glory days of communism.
Like many elderly Armenians, he never managed to adapt to the demands
of an independent state.
"For Armenia, the period of Soviet rule was a golden age. I was against
the collapse of the [Soviet] Union, and I was against the protests
and strikes that ended up with most of the population permanently on
strike," Mkhitaryan, 85, said.
Before the end of the Soviet Union, which officially took place on
December 25, 1991, Mkhitaryan was chairman of the regional council of
Echmiadzin region. He had been a high-flier in the communist system,
serving as a deputy minister at one point.
Asked about the fruits of independence, Mkhitaryan scoffed, "The only
independent countries are great powers. Countries like ours only exist
under someone else's wing. They said then that we were slaves of the
Soviet Union. Now whose slaves are we? Nagorny Karabakh is our only
achievement, and if the Soviet Union hadn't collapsed, I am sure that
issue would have been resolved without bloodshed."
Twenty years ago, views like Mkhitaryan's were definitely in the
minority in Armenia. In a September 1991 referendum, a month after
hardliners in Moscow staged an unsuccessful coup against Mikhail
Gorbachev, 95 per cent of Armenians backed independence.
The years since then have not been easy. Armenia was already reeling
from the terrible Spitak earthquake of 1988, which killed 25,000
people and devastated much of the country, when it went to war with
Azerbaijan over the future of Nagorny Karabakh.
Karabakh was a part of Soviet Azerbaijan whose mainly Armenian
population pressed for the region to become separate. The ensuing
war, combined with the effects of conflict in neighbouring Georgia,
left Armenia almost totally isolated economically.
Before 1991, Armenia was industrialised, but after independence,
the authorities struggled just to keep the lights on. Residents of
the capital Yerevan had just an hour of electricity a day.
According to the International Monetary Fund, IMF, Armenia's economy
shrank by 75 per cent between 1990 and 1993.
Economic decline meant the views of old communists like Aram Sargsyan,
the final head of the Armenian Communist Party, came back into vogue.
"We were like oxen that jump for joy when they're released from the
yoke," he said. "The moral foundations of society have been destroyed,
everything is permitted. Why did we have to destroy everything? We
have reserves of gold, copper and molybdenum - these are riches for
a small country."
Sargsyan says Armenia is now reliant on the IMF and World Bank,
which he accused of imposing their own demands as a condition for
bailing out the economy.
"These international institutions decided that Armenia had nothing
to contribute in terms of industry or science, so it should become
a service centre for the region. So they gave money for roads,
infrastructure and banks," he said.
Sargysan blames these policies for making Armenia's human capital
"surplus to requirements", and thus contributing to mass emigration.
According to official figures, 1.2 million people have left Armenia in
the last 20 years, many of them going to Russia to find work. Arthur
Atanesyan, head of the Sociology Department of the Yerevan State
University, says these people have voted with their feet against
independence.
"Any independence process entails destabilisation. If the status quo
changes, it leads to.... emigration. People have to go abroad where
they can live much better and more secure lives. That isn't a great
assessment of what has happened, because you become nostalgic for
the old Soviet Union again," he said.
Atanesyan concluded, "Destroying things is easy. They should have
kept and developed everything that was positive and valuable in the
Soviet Union. There are many families who lost not just their stable
lifestyles but their savings, too."
Araik Petrosyan's parents had saved 80,000 roubles by the time the
Soviet Union came to an end. That was a lot of money in those days,
but its value vanished with the end of communism.
"First my mother died, then my father, without living long enough to
get their money back," Petrosian said. "The state is treating these
savings as part of the national debt; once there's enough money, all
these savings will be returned. But it remains uncertain whether any
of the account holders will live long enough to see their money. Their
descendants don't have rights to the money."
Soviet citizens had limited access to consumer goods like clothes,
which came from the same shops and were made in the same factories,
but Atanesyan said that "despite their uninteresting lives, people
stood firmly on their own two feet, received free healthcare, they got
an education, they had jobs and they were confident about the future".
"In Soviet times there was a shortage of clothing, now there's a
shortage of trust. We don't trust the government and we don't trust
one another," he added.
Analysts say this mistrust is a consequence of Armenia's failure to
build a democratic system and a competitive market economy.
"We rejected the planned economy, and then basically created the same
kind of system where property is controlled if not by the state, then
by the highest tiers of government," Andranik Tevanyan, director of
the Politeconomia research centre, said. "We got rid of Bolshevism,
but we weren't able to abandon the Soviet legacy. In Armenia we see
sections of the economy centralised around individual oligarchs. It's
basically a recreation of the Soviet Union, only with no oil or gas."
Tevanyan sees corruption, protectionism, and the lack of transparent
laws as other legacies of the Soviet period.
Corruption is endemic in Armenia, as in almost all other former Soviet
republics. The corruption watchdog Transparency International ranks
Armenia 129 out of 183 states for honesty in public life.
Fortunately, however, many young Armenians have adapted to the changes,
and have few regrets about the passing of the Soviet Union.
Suren Musaelyan, now 35, was a teenager when Armenia became
independent. He had an opportunity to study journalism in Britain
and is now deputy editor of Armenianow, a leading online news source.
"If the Soviet Union hadn't collapsed, I wouldn't have had a chance
to be educated abroad," he said." I think that's one of the bonuses
of independence. In earlier years I wouldn't have been able to dream
of it," he said.
Older Armenians are often amazed at how young adults can barely
comprehend the difficulties of life in the Soviet Union.
"Young Armenians no longer understand that there was a time when
Moscow decided how many pieces of soap were to be used a week in some
town's public toilet," Alexander Iskandaryan, director of the Caucasus
Institute in Yerevan, said. "Because of the sheer scale of collapse
here, Armenia has travelled a lot further away from the Soviet past
than a lot of other states have done."
Gayane Lazarian is a journalist with Armenianow. Naira Melkumyan is
a freelance journalist in Armenia.
By Gayane Lazarian, Naira Melkumyan
Institute for War and Peace Reporting IWPR
January 4, 2012
UK
While younger people have little conception of life under communist
rule, some Armenians miss the positive things lost after the Soviet
collapse.
Two decades have passed since the Soviet flag was lowered over Armenia,
but Sedrak Mkhitaryan's hands still shake when he brings out the red
flags and Lenin medals he treasures from the glory days of communism.
Like many elderly Armenians, he never managed to adapt to the demands
of an independent state.
"For Armenia, the period of Soviet rule was a golden age. I was against
the collapse of the [Soviet] Union, and I was against the protests
and strikes that ended up with most of the population permanently on
strike," Mkhitaryan, 85, said.
Before the end of the Soviet Union, which officially took place on
December 25, 1991, Mkhitaryan was chairman of the regional council of
Echmiadzin region. He had been a high-flier in the communist system,
serving as a deputy minister at one point.
Asked about the fruits of independence, Mkhitaryan scoffed, "The only
independent countries are great powers. Countries like ours only exist
under someone else's wing. They said then that we were slaves of the
Soviet Union. Now whose slaves are we? Nagorny Karabakh is our only
achievement, and if the Soviet Union hadn't collapsed, I am sure that
issue would have been resolved without bloodshed."
Twenty years ago, views like Mkhitaryan's were definitely in the
minority in Armenia. In a September 1991 referendum, a month after
hardliners in Moscow staged an unsuccessful coup against Mikhail
Gorbachev, 95 per cent of Armenians backed independence.
The years since then have not been easy. Armenia was already reeling
from the terrible Spitak earthquake of 1988, which killed 25,000
people and devastated much of the country, when it went to war with
Azerbaijan over the future of Nagorny Karabakh.
Karabakh was a part of Soviet Azerbaijan whose mainly Armenian
population pressed for the region to become separate. The ensuing
war, combined with the effects of conflict in neighbouring Georgia,
left Armenia almost totally isolated economically.
Before 1991, Armenia was industrialised, but after independence,
the authorities struggled just to keep the lights on. Residents of
the capital Yerevan had just an hour of electricity a day.
According to the International Monetary Fund, IMF, Armenia's economy
shrank by 75 per cent between 1990 and 1993.
Economic decline meant the views of old communists like Aram Sargsyan,
the final head of the Armenian Communist Party, came back into vogue.
"We were like oxen that jump for joy when they're released from the
yoke," he said. "The moral foundations of society have been destroyed,
everything is permitted. Why did we have to destroy everything? We
have reserves of gold, copper and molybdenum - these are riches for
a small country."
Sargsyan says Armenia is now reliant on the IMF and World Bank,
which he accused of imposing their own demands as a condition for
bailing out the economy.
"These international institutions decided that Armenia had nothing
to contribute in terms of industry or science, so it should become
a service centre for the region. So they gave money for roads,
infrastructure and banks," he said.
Sargysan blames these policies for making Armenia's human capital
"surplus to requirements", and thus contributing to mass emigration.
According to official figures, 1.2 million people have left Armenia in
the last 20 years, many of them going to Russia to find work. Arthur
Atanesyan, head of the Sociology Department of the Yerevan State
University, says these people have voted with their feet against
independence.
"Any independence process entails destabilisation. If the status quo
changes, it leads to.... emigration. People have to go abroad where
they can live much better and more secure lives. That isn't a great
assessment of what has happened, because you become nostalgic for
the old Soviet Union again," he said.
Atanesyan concluded, "Destroying things is easy. They should have
kept and developed everything that was positive and valuable in the
Soviet Union. There are many families who lost not just their stable
lifestyles but their savings, too."
Araik Petrosyan's parents had saved 80,000 roubles by the time the
Soviet Union came to an end. That was a lot of money in those days,
but its value vanished with the end of communism.
"First my mother died, then my father, without living long enough to
get their money back," Petrosian said. "The state is treating these
savings as part of the national debt; once there's enough money, all
these savings will be returned. But it remains uncertain whether any
of the account holders will live long enough to see their money. Their
descendants don't have rights to the money."
Soviet citizens had limited access to consumer goods like clothes,
which came from the same shops and were made in the same factories,
but Atanesyan said that "despite their uninteresting lives, people
stood firmly on their own two feet, received free healthcare, they got
an education, they had jobs and they were confident about the future".
"In Soviet times there was a shortage of clothing, now there's a
shortage of trust. We don't trust the government and we don't trust
one another," he added.
Analysts say this mistrust is a consequence of Armenia's failure to
build a democratic system and a competitive market economy.
"We rejected the planned economy, and then basically created the same
kind of system where property is controlled if not by the state, then
by the highest tiers of government," Andranik Tevanyan, director of
the Politeconomia research centre, said. "We got rid of Bolshevism,
but we weren't able to abandon the Soviet legacy. In Armenia we see
sections of the economy centralised around individual oligarchs. It's
basically a recreation of the Soviet Union, only with no oil or gas."
Tevanyan sees corruption, protectionism, and the lack of transparent
laws as other legacies of the Soviet period.
Corruption is endemic in Armenia, as in almost all other former Soviet
republics. The corruption watchdog Transparency International ranks
Armenia 129 out of 183 states for honesty in public life.
Fortunately, however, many young Armenians have adapted to the changes,
and have few regrets about the passing of the Soviet Union.
Suren Musaelyan, now 35, was a teenager when Armenia became
independent. He had an opportunity to study journalism in Britain
and is now deputy editor of Armenianow, a leading online news source.
"If the Soviet Union hadn't collapsed, I wouldn't have had a chance
to be educated abroad," he said." I think that's one of the bonuses
of independence. In earlier years I wouldn't have been able to dream
of it," he said.
Older Armenians are often amazed at how young adults can barely
comprehend the difficulties of life in the Soviet Union.
"Young Armenians no longer understand that there was a time when
Moscow decided how many pieces of soap were to be used a week in some
town's public toilet," Alexander Iskandaryan, director of the Caucasus
Institute in Yerevan, said. "Because of the sheer scale of collapse
here, Armenia has travelled a lot further away from the Soviet past
than a lot of other states have done."
Gayane Lazarian is a journalist with Armenianow. Naira Melkumyan is
a freelance journalist in Armenia.