Tweet
ARMENIAN FM VS ISRAEL
Day.az
Feb 10 2012
Azerbaijan
He is an old fool. Albeit, age can't be blamed here. (Mikhail
Zhvanetsky)
Hope no one will argue that Armenian Foreign Minister Edward Nalbandian
is a unique personality. Albeit, no, not in such a way.
Nalbandian is one of the most unique individuals in this unique
Armenian government. Yes, exactly. It will be more correct.
It is he, together with Armenian Serzh Sargsyan and Defense Minister
Seiran Ohanian, who form a triumvirate of "genius" leadership of
the neighboring country, about which one might as well write books
that surely will be claiming to become bestsellers. Even, I can
recommend a title for the book-'How not to run the country"'. Think
it suits. It's simple. But most importantly, accurately reflects the
meaning of possibly once written books.
Reacting to the neighboring state's policy seriously is the same as
disrespecting yourself. Thus, if you react to it, then surely with
a smile and for fun.
Well, then. Recently, Edward Nalbandian criticized his Israeli
counterpart Avigdor Lieberman, as he spoke out against the adoption
of not only the law criminalizing denial of the so-called 'Armenian
genocide', but also against the law on allegedly occurred 'genocide'.
He urged the Israeli deputies not to follow the example of the French
colleagues, but think clearly and carefully.
Of course, Avigdor Lieberman's logical and just reasoning dissatisfied
Nalbandian, who began to bring demagogic arguments on the terms
'genocide' and 'Holocaust'.
Without giving any clear reasons (as always) in favor of that the
'Armenian genocide' tough took place in the Ottoman Empire, Nalbandian,
swaggering in front of the Armenian deputies, was trying, in a clumsy
way, to explain why Lieberman was wrong.
Familiarizing with Nalbandian's speech, the first question that begs
itself relates to the minister's nourishment. More precisely, possible
medicaments or illicit drugs, which he likely uses. Otherwise, how
can one explain the fact that toothless and completely characterless
Armenia, which cannot survive as an independent state even a day
without its patrons, begins to teach the Israeli state and specify
how to conduct its internal and foreign policy, which laws to adopt
and which not?
It'll be not a surprise if it turns out that the French Senate's
decision to criminalize denial of the "Armenian genocide" turned head
of Nalbandian, his colleagues and bosses, and now they think they
have the right to teach and indicate to other states. Oh, and to which!
But, there is no real reason for this. Think, the vast majority of
the Armenian citizens are well aware that French President Nicolas
Sarkozy absolutely does not care about historical events, concepts
such as 'fairness' and their life today. Sarkozy is concerned over
only two factors - the re-election to a second term, and unfounded
fears to see Turkey in the European Union.
Finally, the adoption of the aforementioned law brings Armenia and
its citizens absolutely no practical use, but only complicates their
already difficult lives.
Surely, the citizens of neighboring state will soon 'get down' to
earth the country's rulers, who had better not to act against the
country, but for the sake of it. Armenia will soon go to elections,
but dissatisfaction with the domestic and foreign policy of the
authorities is growing every day. And the Armenian people will pay
back to Nalbandian and those like him for the adoption of the French
law. But, it's unlikely to satisfy Nalbandian ...
From: Emil Lazarian | Ararat NewsPress
Day.az
Feb 10 2012
Azerbaijan
He is an old fool. Albeit, age can't be blamed here. (Mikhail
Zhvanetsky)
Hope no one will argue that Armenian Foreign Minister Edward Nalbandian
is a unique personality. Albeit, no, not in such a way.
Nalbandian is one of the most unique individuals in this unique
Armenian government. Yes, exactly. It will be more correct.
It is he, together with Armenian Serzh Sargsyan and Defense Minister
Seiran Ohanian, who form a triumvirate of "genius" leadership of
the neighboring country, about which one might as well write books
that surely will be claiming to become bestsellers. Even, I can
recommend a title for the book-'How not to run the country"'. Think
it suits. It's simple. But most importantly, accurately reflects the
meaning of possibly once written books.
Reacting to the neighboring state's policy seriously is the same as
disrespecting yourself. Thus, if you react to it, then surely with
a smile and for fun.
Well, then. Recently, Edward Nalbandian criticized his Israeli
counterpart Avigdor Lieberman, as he spoke out against the adoption
of not only the law criminalizing denial of the so-called 'Armenian
genocide', but also against the law on allegedly occurred 'genocide'.
He urged the Israeli deputies not to follow the example of the French
colleagues, but think clearly and carefully.
Of course, Avigdor Lieberman's logical and just reasoning dissatisfied
Nalbandian, who began to bring demagogic arguments on the terms
'genocide' and 'Holocaust'.
Without giving any clear reasons (as always) in favor of that the
'Armenian genocide' tough took place in the Ottoman Empire, Nalbandian,
swaggering in front of the Armenian deputies, was trying, in a clumsy
way, to explain why Lieberman was wrong.
Familiarizing with Nalbandian's speech, the first question that begs
itself relates to the minister's nourishment. More precisely, possible
medicaments or illicit drugs, which he likely uses. Otherwise, how
can one explain the fact that toothless and completely characterless
Armenia, which cannot survive as an independent state even a day
without its patrons, begins to teach the Israeli state and specify
how to conduct its internal and foreign policy, which laws to adopt
and which not?
It'll be not a surprise if it turns out that the French Senate's
decision to criminalize denial of the "Armenian genocide" turned head
of Nalbandian, his colleagues and bosses, and now they think they
have the right to teach and indicate to other states. Oh, and to which!
But, there is no real reason for this. Think, the vast majority of
the Armenian citizens are well aware that French President Nicolas
Sarkozy absolutely does not care about historical events, concepts
such as 'fairness' and their life today. Sarkozy is concerned over
only two factors - the re-election to a second term, and unfounded
fears to see Turkey in the European Union.
Finally, the adoption of the aforementioned law brings Armenia and
its citizens absolutely no practical use, but only complicates their
already difficult lives.
Surely, the citizens of neighboring state will soon 'get down' to
earth the country's rulers, who had better not to act against the
country, but for the sake of it. Armenia will soon go to elections,
but dissatisfaction with the domestic and foreign policy of the
authorities is growing every day. And the Armenian people will pay
back to Nalbandian and those like him for the adoption of the French
law. But, it's unlikely to satisfy Nalbandian ...
From: Emil Lazarian | Ararat NewsPress