Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Armenians Disappointed With Washington. United States Cuts Aid To Ce

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Armenians Disappointed With Washington. United States Cuts Aid To Ce

    ARMENIANS DISAPPOINTED WITH WASHINGTON. UNITED STATES CUTS AID TO CENTRAL ASIAN AND SOUTH CAUCASUS FSU COUNTRIES
    by Yuriy Roks

    Nezavisimaya Gazeta
    Feb 16 2012
    Russia

    [translated from Russian]

    Washington has published figures for the levels of assistance that
    it intends to provide to FSU countries in 2013. Because of its own
    problems, the United States' subsidies to Central Asian and South
    Caucasus states have generally been cut in comparison with previous
    years. The cutbacks have virtually not affected the military segment
    - Washington has merely attempted to equalize the numerical figures
    for the countries in both regions. An exception has been made for
    Georgia - it will receive 14.4m dollars through this channel, which
    is more than all the other countries put together.

    Tbilisi is exultant. For the authorities, such an exception from the
    common run is proof of the correctness of their foreign policy and
    confirmation that the alliance services being provided to Washington in
    military campaigns, to the extent that its resources and opportunities
    allow, are not going unnoticed.

    The effect was intensified by a statement that James Appathurai,
    the NATO secretary general's special representative for the South
    Caucasus and Central Asia, made on Armenian Public Television Channel
    1 recently during a regional tour. "Georgia's NATO membership is a
    done deal.... Georgia is seeking to join the North Atlantic Alliance,
    and to this end important reforms are being implemented with a view
    to meeting NATO standards," he said.

    The news of 1.5m dollars in US military aid was also received
    positively in Tashkent. Uzbekistan was completely denied American
    subsidies in connection with the well-known 2003 events in Andijon.

    Washington has been compelled to overturn the decision, which had been
    in place for 10 years, by Tashkent's support for the counterterrorist
    operation in Afghanistan. According to the publication EurasiaNet,
    Kyrgyzstan and Tajikistan will receive the same amount from the
    American treasury, while Kazakhstan will get a little more (1.8m
    dollars) and Turkmenistan will get 685,000 dollars.

    Given the explosive situation in the South Caucasus and, evidently,
    its demonstration of a neutral attitude towards the Karabakh conflict,
    the United States has decided to help Armenia and Azerbaijan on
    a parity basis in 2013 - they will each get 2.7m dollars. For
    Azerbaijan, whose military budget is close to the $2 billion mark,
    Washington's assistance can be regarded as symbolic. Which cannot be
    said about Armenia. And although the Armenian side, while expressing
    gratitude, commented that the condition of its military structures
    has never been dependent on American financial injections, definite
    disappointment can be seen. Especially since Washington, despite
    cutting overall assistance to the former Soviet Union countries,
    as has already been noted, has "remembered" another regional
    "friend" of Armenia's - Turkey, offering it to 3.6m dollars for
    the implementation of an international military education programme
    with the explanation: "Ankara continues to play a growing role as a
    strengthening global partner." For a state like Turkey this money is
    not all that significant, and this gesture should probably be seen as
    a US appeal to Ankara to forget about a number of factors that have
    introduced elements of contradiction and mutual irritation into the
    bilateral relationship.

    But Washington's explanation of the motives for its decisions on
    the countries receiving assistance has been little consolation to
    Armenian public organizations in the United States. A statement
    that was issued by the office of Ai Dat ("The Armenian Issue" - a
    worldwide organization that is concerned with the global problems
    of the Armenian people and which coordinates the work of various
    national organizations) and has been cited by a number of Armenian
    media expresses disappointment with US President Barack Obama's actions
    and says that he actually called for a 19 per cent cut in overall aid
    to Yerevan and the granting of 27.2m dollars in fiscal 2013. And this
    even after the Congress had approved a sum of 40m dollars.

    At a news conference Aram Hambaryan, head of the Washington office
    of Ai Dat, expressed regret that Obama is in no hurry to keep
    his promises that he gave to the US Armenian community during his
    election campaign. Not only has he "forgotten" about the genocide
    issue but he is also cutting financial aid. "We notice yet again with
    no surprise that the president is again trying to cut economic aid
    to Armenia despite the serious economic consequences of the blockade
    being carried out by Turkey and Azerbaijan and despite Armenia's
    comprehensive support for US operations in Afghanistan, Iraq, and
    Kosovo," Hambaryan noted.

    Elizabeth Chouldjian, the office's press secretary, made it clear
    in an interview with Armenian journalists that the organization will
    make every effort to ensure that the volume of annual aid to Armenia
    gets increased in the course of the discussions in the Committee on
    Foreign Relations of the House of Representatives of the US Congress
    and the Senate and that a further 10m dollars for Nagorno-Karabakh
    gets enshrined in a separate line item. She stressed that during the
    election campaign, apart from recognizing the genocide, both Obama and
    future Secretary of State and Vice President Hillary Clinton and Joe
    Biden promised the liberalization and expansion of trade with Armenia,
    a tough stance on the issue of Azerbaijan's violation of the cease-fire
    regime in Karabakh, and a deepening of the ties between Armenia and
    the United States. But there is no progress in any of these areas;
    even the reverse. Thus, Clinton stated recently that the genocide
    of Armenians is a matter that needs to be discussed by historians
    whereas 42 American states have officially recognized the genocide,
    Chouldjian said.

    [translated from Russian]




    From: A. Papazian
Working...
X