Tweet
THE REPORT ON DINK MURDER CASE IS NOT PUBLISHED FULLY: CHETIN WILL APPEAL
http://www.yerkirmedia.am/?act=news&lan=en&id=5412
19:07 . 21/02
In Turkey even if they tell a truth, it must surely be not complete.
Yesterday such a situation was created around the document published
in the result of the long-term investigation into Dink's murder and
the trial by the special council under President Abdullah Gul.
On January 28 in 2011, at the order of President Abduallh Gul, the
Turkish State Supervisory Council started the investigation into trial
on Hrant Dink's murder. A part of the report prepared in the result of
the investigation was presented to the public yesterday. The report
considered to be confidential is not only partly made public, some
points and details which are meant for public are not publicised,
but also it isn't provided to the Dink family and the advocates in
full text.
Dink family attorney Fethiye Chetin is categorically against this
decision. According to her, how confidential the report may be, the
family and the advocates have full right to get the whole version. The
latter ones will launch an appeal at corresponding bodies to get
the report.
Before that, after the publication of the report, the local media
continuously speak on several important points of the report. Some
TV channels even say this report means that the state at last, even
indirectly accepted its guilt. One of the axial points in the report
states that the staff of the police and gendarmerie was quite aware
that Dink's life is in danger and contrary to that, they hadn't
taken any steps. Thus, Article 17 of the Turkish Constitution and
Article 2 of the European Convention of human Rights forming part of
the internal laws were violated. This means it is necessary to start
investigation immediately on the state bodies involved in Dink's case.
Abuse of powers, negligence in ones duties and many other similar
points, which were included in the report of the state supervisory
council, give hope of probable restart of Dink's trial from the
very beginning.
Finally, in the result of these long 5 years a tangible result was
achieved today. There is a verdict not accepted by the public and at
the same time, there are serious doubts on impartiality and reliability
of all the state structures.
From: Baghdasarian
http://www.yerkirmedia.am/?act=news&lan=en&id=5412
19:07 . 21/02
In Turkey even if they tell a truth, it must surely be not complete.
Yesterday such a situation was created around the document published
in the result of the long-term investigation into Dink's murder and
the trial by the special council under President Abdullah Gul.
On January 28 in 2011, at the order of President Abduallh Gul, the
Turkish State Supervisory Council started the investigation into trial
on Hrant Dink's murder. A part of the report prepared in the result of
the investigation was presented to the public yesterday. The report
considered to be confidential is not only partly made public, some
points and details which are meant for public are not publicised,
but also it isn't provided to the Dink family and the advocates in
full text.
Dink family attorney Fethiye Chetin is categorically against this
decision. According to her, how confidential the report may be, the
family and the advocates have full right to get the whole version. The
latter ones will launch an appeal at corresponding bodies to get
the report.
Before that, after the publication of the report, the local media
continuously speak on several important points of the report. Some
TV channels even say this report means that the state at last, even
indirectly accepted its guilt. One of the axial points in the report
states that the staff of the police and gendarmerie was quite aware
that Dink's life is in danger and contrary to that, they hadn't
taken any steps. Thus, Article 17 of the Turkish Constitution and
Article 2 of the European Convention of human Rights forming part of
the internal laws were violated. This means it is necessary to start
investigation immediately on the state bodies involved in Dink's case.
Abuse of powers, negligence in ones duties and many other similar
points, which were included in the report of the state supervisory
council, give hope of probable restart of Dink's trial from the
very beginning.
Finally, in the result of these long 5 years a tangible result was
achieved today. There is a verdict not accepted by the public and at
the same time, there are serious doubts on impartiality and reliability
of all the state structures.
From: Baghdasarian