Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

"Innocent" Pay Back: Sacked Armenian Road Police Chief Says Not Guil

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • "Innocent" Pay Back: Sacked Armenian Road Police Chief Says Not Guil

    "INNOCENT" PAY BACK: SACKED ARMENIAN ROAD POLICE CHIEF SAYS NOT GUILTY, BUT PAYS STATE HALF MILLION "HONOR" DOLLARS
    By Siranuysh Gevorgyan

    ArmeniaNow
    10.01.12 | 12:02

    Armenia's former Road Police chief Margar Ohanyan has paid an
    equivalent of about half a million dollars to the state budget to
    compensate for missing funds that prosecutors say were embezzled
    during his time in office and for what he was arrested, fired and
    indicted last year.

    At the start of a high-profile trial on Monday Ohanyan still pleaded
    not guilty of charges of large-scale embezzlement of public funds and
    abuse of office brought against him by the state. The colonel's defense
    attorney said despite not admitting his guilt his client had decided to
    compensate the loss of public funds - by collecting money from family
    and friends - because it was a matter of 'honor and dignity' for him.

    In late August Ohanyan was arrested and subsequently sacked in a
    criminal investigation into the alleged theft of more than 150 tons
    of fuel that was allotted to road police cars. The case against him
    is based on incriminating testimony given by three of his former
    subordinates also standing trial. Unlike Ohanyan they are not kept
    in pre-trial detention.

    At they first court hearing the former Road Police chief made some
    remarkable statements, in particular dropping hints that his arrest
    and prosecution were because of his personal relations with leading
    officials of the police system.

    Ohanyan's lawyer Mkrtich Vasakyan asked Yerevan's Kentron and
    Nork-Marash district court to release his client on bail or under a
    written agreement not to leave the city while the trial is on. Before
    judge Mkhitar Papoyan retired to the deliberation room to make the
    decision, Ohanyan said there was something that he wanted to talk
    to the judge and the prosecuting attorney Harutyun Harutyunyan. The
    judge said there was no such practice in court hearings, after which,
    without giving specific names, Ohanyan said that he had been turned
    from a witness into a suspect following just one phone call [from a
    high-ranking official]. He did not specify who the alleged caller was.

    "On August 30, I was summoned to the Special Investigation Service,
    I wrote that there was no such thing, nor could be, for 40 minutes
    there was nothing, but after one phone call, my status of a witness
    was changed into that of a suspect and I was arrested. It had its
    own circumstances that I cannot speak about. I beg you to be clear to
    your conscience and consider that I have been in prison already for
    four months and I don't know why. They simply needed to remove me,
    arrest me so that they could complete what had been set from the
    beginning," he said.

    "The matter concerns the police structure where I worked. I should
    have told you straightforwardly who had come and taken whom before the
    Special Investigation Service. Don't wage someone else's battle. Don't
    complete the case of my personal relations with corresponding senior
    officials here," added Ohanyan.

    Then addressing other defendants Ara Levonyan and Samvel Makhmudyan,
    Ohanyan said: "I'll tell [the court] how it was, who was kept for
    how many hours, who was the mediator, the high-ranking official --
    whom I don't want to name - who got him [Levonyan] to be released
    from the sixth department at three o'clock in the morning. You think
    I won't tell, or you, who came and took you. So what that he is a
    member of parliament?"

    The court eventually rejected the petition from the counsel for
    the defense about the defendant's release on bail. Talking to
    journalists later Ohanyan's lawyer Vasakyan abstained from commenting
    on his client's statements in court. He said that he did not want
    to elaborate proceeding from defense tactics and that answers to all
    questions would be provided during the trial.

    The next hearing in the trial is due to take place on January 13.

Working...
X