Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Commentary Of The NKR MFA Information Department

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Commentary Of The NKR MFA Information Department

    COMMENTARY OF THE NKR MFA INFORMATION DEPARTMENT

    Story from Lragir.am News:
    http://www.lragir.am/engsrc/politics24811.html
    Published: 12:21:47 - 16/01/2012

    NKR MFA Information Department

    On December 22, 2011, the OSCE Permanent Council approved the Unified
    Budget of the organization for 2012. Along with this, the Permanent
    Council discussed a request to increase the funding for the Office
    of the Personal Representative of the OSCE Chairman-in-Office (CiO)
    to ensure sufficient resources to investigate potential incidents on
    the Line of Contact between the armed forces of Nagorno Karabakh and
    Azerbaijan, in pursuance of the agreements of February 6, 1995 signed
    by the three parties to the conflict (Nagorno Karabakh, Armenia,
    and Azerbaijan) through the mediation of the Co-Chairs of the OSCE
    Minsk Conference.

    The idea of increasing the funds for the Office of the CiO Personal
    Representative was widely supported by the OSCE member-states. It is
    symbolic that the idea was opposed only by the Azerbaijani delegation,
    which explained its position by the fact that it could not approve
    additional funding for the Office until a final agreement on the
    details of the mechanism of the incidents' investigation was achieved.

    Unfortunately, it is not the first time we face a situation where the
    actions of the Azerbaijani leadership fully contradict the earlier
    statements and agreements at the highest level, in particular, the
    agreements achieved in Sochi on March 5, 2011 by the Presidents of
    Russia, Armenia, and Azerbaijan.

    This confirms once again that Azerbaijan is not interested in
    the investigation of incidents on the Contact-Line, since it will
    be eventually established that it is the Azerbaijani party that
    periodically exercises provocations, thereby deepening the hostility
    and distrust of the parties towards each other and driving the
    negotiation process to a deadlock.




    From: A. Papazian
Working...
X