THOUSANDS IN TURKEY MARK KILLING OF ARMENIAN JOURNALIST AMID CRITICISM OF COURT RULING
Voice of America
http://www.voanews.com/english/news/europe/Thousands-in-Turkey-Mark-Killing-of-Armenian-Journalist-Amid-Criticism-of-Court-Ruling-137687733.html
Jan 20 2012
In Istanbul, tens of thousands of supporters of slain ethnic-Armenian
journalist Hrant Dink, marked the fifth anniversary of his murder,
with many claiming the Turkish state was involved. But a court
on Tuesday ruled there was no conspiracy, provoking national and
international criticism.
"We want justice for Hrant," shout supporters of the slain
ethnic-Armenian journalist Hrant Dink. Tens of thousands of
people marched through the center of Istanbul to the offices of the
Turkish-Armenian newspaper Agos, which Dink once edited, to mark the
fifth anniversary of his murder. Along with grief, the protesters
are expressing anger.
On Tuesday, a court convicted a man for instigating the murder,
but acquitted 19 people on state conspiracy charges. For this, Dink
supporters say justice was not served.
"The real subjects of this case have not been imprisoned," For me,
it represents the state's attitude towards this kind of political
murders. Like they mostly protect the killers rather than punish them."
Dink was shot dead just outside his office by 17-year-old nationalist
Ogun Samast. Samast was sentenced last year to 22 years in jail.
But Dink's family and supporters claim senior members of the Turkish
state were the architects of his murder. Dink had been a target
for nationalists and the state for describing the mass killings of
Armenians in Turkey during World War I as genocide. Shortly before
his murder he was convicted of insulting Turkey with his views.
The Turkish representative of U.S.-based Human Rights Watch, Emma
Sinclair Webb, says with so much evidence implicating the state in
Dink's murder, the court's decision gives a disturbing message.
"If you are an Armenian journalist in Turkey, you can be murdered, and
your killers who are deeply connected with the state will somehow not
be investigated for their links with the state," said Webb. "And the
state authorities will not be held to account. That is the message
this case gives. And more broadly, the case comes in [a] climate
of clamp-down on the government oppositionists and imprisonment of
particularly Kurdish journalists."
Turkey's ruling AK party is facing growing criticism in connection
with the case. The party had been seen as being in the forefront of
purging the state of anti-democratic forces.
Hundreds of senior state officials, including army officers, are
currently on trial as part of Ergenekon, a network prosecutors allege
was seeking to overthrow the government and implicated in numerous
political assassinations. A prosecutor in the Dink trial also claimed
Ergenekon was behind the Dink killing - a charge rejected by the court.
Political scientist Cengiz Aktar of Istanbul Bahcesehir University
says the Dink verdict is a worrying sign for Turkey. He argues now
that the state is purged of anti-government forces, the ruling AK
party has become the status quo.
"We have always had a difference between the government and state,"
said Aktar. "The state was actually working against the AK government
in the early years of its power. But now it is one and the same. It is
clear the Turkish democratic transformation is coming to an end. It
means the old forces, the old elite, and the old habits will come
back."
Addressing the media after the verdict, Fethiye Cetin, a lawyer
representing the Dink family, gave a warning to the government.
Cetin says those in power today appear to have formed an alliance
with the traditional forces of the state, but she says their alliance
is temporary unless the state transforms itself," said Cetin. "She
says this traditional force will eventually end its alliance by
exterminating those in power.
Turkish Deputy Prime Minister Bulent Arinc acknowledged the criticism
about the verdict and says it can be appealed.
But among Dink supporters protesting the verdict, there are mixed
feelings about whether justice can ever be secured.
"No, not now," said a supporter. "But we believe we will get justice
with this activity. We believe we will take our justice for Hrant. We
must take justice. It is a state murdering."
"I just believe in the justice, in the people, because I am not
believing in justice in this country anymore," aded another supporter.
Dink's supporters are now preparing for a long battle for justice. The
outcome of that struggle is being seen as a crucial test for the
government in its commitment to democratic reform.
Voice of America
http://www.voanews.com/english/news/europe/Thousands-in-Turkey-Mark-Killing-of-Armenian-Journalist-Amid-Criticism-of-Court-Ruling-137687733.html
Jan 20 2012
In Istanbul, tens of thousands of supporters of slain ethnic-Armenian
journalist Hrant Dink, marked the fifth anniversary of his murder,
with many claiming the Turkish state was involved. But a court
on Tuesday ruled there was no conspiracy, provoking national and
international criticism.
"We want justice for Hrant," shout supporters of the slain
ethnic-Armenian journalist Hrant Dink. Tens of thousands of
people marched through the center of Istanbul to the offices of the
Turkish-Armenian newspaper Agos, which Dink once edited, to mark the
fifth anniversary of his murder. Along with grief, the protesters
are expressing anger.
On Tuesday, a court convicted a man for instigating the murder,
but acquitted 19 people on state conspiracy charges. For this, Dink
supporters say justice was not served.
"The real subjects of this case have not been imprisoned," For me,
it represents the state's attitude towards this kind of political
murders. Like they mostly protect the killers rather than punish them."
Dink was shot dead just outside his office by 17-year-old nationalist
Ogun Samast. Samast was sentenced last year to 22 years in jail.
But Dink's family and supporters claim senior members of the Turkish
state were the architects of his murder. Dink had been a target
for nationalists and the state for describing the mass killings of
Armenians in Turkey during World War I as genocide. Shortly before
his murder he was convicted of insulting Turkey with his views.
The Turkish representative of U.S.-based Human Rights Watch, Emma
Sinclair Webb, says with so much evidence implicating the state in
Dink's murder, the court's decision gives a disturbing message.
"If you are an Armenian journalist in Turkey, you can be murdered, and
your killers who are deeply connected with the state will somehow not
be investigated for their links with the state," said Webb. "And the
state authorities will not be held to account. That is the message
this case gives. And more broadly, the case comes in [a] climate
of clamp-down on the government oppositionists and imprisonment of
particularly Kurdish journalists."
Turkey's ruling AK party is facing growing criticism in connection
with the case. The party had been seen as being in the forefront of
purging the state of anti-democratic forces.
Hundreds of senior state officials, including army officers, are
currently on trial as part of Ergenekon, a network prosecutors allege
was seeking to overthrow the government and implicated in numerous
political assassinations. A prosecutor in the Dink trial also claimed
Ergenekon was behind the Dink killing - a charge rejected by the court.
Political scientist Cengiz Aktar of Istanbul Bahcesehir University
says the Dink verdict is a worrying sign for Turkey. He argues now
that the state is purged of anti-government forces, the ruling AK
party has become the status quo.
"We have always had a difference between the government and state,"
said Aktar. "The state was actually working against the AK government
in the early years of its power. But now it is one and the same. It is
clear the Turkish democratic transformation is coming to an end. It
means the old forces, the old elite, and the old habits will come
back."
Addressing the media after the verdict, Fethiye Cetin, a lawyer
representing the Dink family, gave a warning to the government.
Cetin says those in power today appear to have formed an alliance
with the traditional forces of the state, but she says their alliance
is temporary unless the state transforms itself," said Cetin. "She
says this traditional force will eventually end its alliance by
exterminating those in power.
Turkish Deputy Prime Minister Bulent Arinc acknowledged the criticism
about the verdict and says it can be appealed.
But among Dink supporters protesting the verdict, there are mixed
feelings about whether justice can ever be secured.
"No, not now," said a supporter. "But we believe we will get justice
with this activity. We believe we will take our justice for Hrant. We
must take justice. It is a state murdering."
"I just believe in the justice, in the people, because I am not
believing in justice in this country anymore," aded another supporter.
Dink's supporters are now preparing for a long battle for justice. The
outcome of that struggle is being seen as a crucial test for the
government in its commitment to democratic reform.