Tweet
ERDOGAN SHOULD RESIGN OVER ARMENIA ROW
EurActiv
http://www.euractiv.com/enlargement/erdogan-resign-armenia-row-analysis-510379
Jan 26 2012
Erdogan should have followed a rational and strategic approach
regarding the French bill on Armenian genocide. Instead, he acts
like a small kid in the sandbox, writes Michael Kambeck from European
Friends of Armenia.
Michael Kambeck is Secretary General of the Brussels based NGO European
Friends of Armenia. The following was sent exclusively to EurActiv.
"The hysteria in Turkey over the French bill prohibiting the denial
of the Armenian Genocide could hardly be more self-damaging or more
revealing. Readers of the official Turkish statement of 24 January
will be struck by a tone unworthy of a strong and mature nation
and rather be reminded of speeches of some of those Arabic leaders,
who have recently been ousted by their people.
France is allegedly "damaging the freedom of expression in a
tactless manner", says Turkey, which has just today (25 January 2012)
received another condemning report from Reporters Without Borders
for its further weakening media freedom, dropping down to place 148
out of 178 (France is on 38, Armenia on 75, Azerbaijan on 162). The
French law does the opposite of what the Turkish government claims.It
protects freedom.
France has, together with the country I know best, Germany, for many
years had such laws against the denial of the Holocaust. This has
neither stopped researchers on this issue nor journalistic freedom,
even where journalists took views which I personally would find
inappropriate. But such laws DO protect against blatant hardliners
and their propaganda, who generally practice the politisation that
Prime Minister Erdogan so loudly condemns these days.
He accuses Sarkozy of fishing for Armenian votes, while omitting
the large number of voters with a Turkish background but a French
passport. The Armenian Genocide has long been recognised by France,
as by many other European states and the European Parliament.
This has been done in view of overwhelming evidence, while in Turkey
archives still remain closed, documents still disappear and journalists
writing about 1915, like Hrant Dink, face the opposite of freedom. The
new French law simply brings the prosecution in line with the earlier
recognition decision. The German Bundestag is allegedly considering
a similar move and should do so.
The European ideal of tolerance needs intolerance vis-a-vis
intolerance. Genocide is the ultimate intolerance. Free democracies
need to be strong in their defence against those who seek to undermine
that freedom.
While the law does not mention Turkey and President Sarkozy even sent
a conciliatory letter to the Turkish government, Erdogan's reaction
was a whole list of threats, calling the law "an unjust action,
which disregards human values and public conscience"... "No one
should doubt our Government's principled approach in this issue"
the MFA refers to the announced retaliation measures.
Such words do not sound like the communication of a mature and
proud nation, it sounds like a vexed child in a sand box, saying
"He started first!". Turkey kills its relations with France and
blames France for it. Instead, Turkey would have had the chance to
run a different policy, even a very nationalistic one (which I would
deem wrong but at least clever): Turkey could have opened the border
with Armenia and with that started a process of debating the issue,
which no international player would have liked to interfere with.
Turkey could state, how ever they classify the "events of 1915", that
this was during the Ottoman Empire and hence only indirectly concerns
modern Turkey. Turkey could have focussed on its national interests
by gaining support from the international community for securing a
deal which limits possible Armenian damage claims and embarking on
a course of a genuine zero-problem-policy with its neighbours.
Instead, that zero-problem-policy has visibly failed all around
and Turkey is today mainly known for being "loud". It destroyed its
interests with the EU and sends enraging and mobilising signals to
the Armenian Diaspora around the world and to its own minorities,
especially to the Kurds in its poorer East.
All this has a high price for Turkey and all this has been dominated
neither by Turkey's Foreign Minister nor by the President. In the
interest of the Turkish nation, you would have to call upon Prime
Minister Erdogan to resign.
And as even long-standing friends of Turkey, like MEP and Turkey
rapporteur Oomen-Ruijten, become publicly more and more frustrated
and critical, France and the EU seem to have little to lose, as long
as Mr Erdogan is in power. The only light comes from the Turkish
intelligentsia, which means that civil society is today our best hope
for saving Turkey's modernisation."
From: A. Papazian
EurActiv
http://www.euractiv.com/enlargement/erdogan-resign-armenia-row-analysis-510379
Jan 26 2012
Erdogan should have followed a rational and strategic approach
regarding the French bill on Armenian genocide. Instead, he acts
like a small kid in the sandbox, writes Michael Kambeck from European
Friends of Armenia.
Michael Kambeck is Secretary General of the Brussels based NGO European
Friends of Armenia. The following was sent exclusively to EurActiv.
"The hysteria in Turkey over the French bill prohibiting the denial
of the Armenian Genocide could hardly be more self-damaging or more
revealing. Readers of the official Turkish statement of 24 January
will be struck by a tone unworthy of a strong and mature nation
and rather be reminded of speeches of some of those Arabic leaders,
who have recently been ousted by their people.
France is allegedly "damaging the freedom of expression in a
tactless manner", says Turkey, which has just today (25 January 2012)
received another condemning report from Reporters Without Borders
for its further weakening media freedom, dropping down to place 148
out of 178 (France is on 38, Armenia on 75, Azerbaijan on 162). The
French law does the opposite of what the Turkish government claims.It
protects freedom.
France has, together with the country I know best, Germany, for many
years had such laws against the denial of the Holocaust. This has
neither stopped researchers on this issue nor journalistic freedom,
even where journalists took views which I personally would find
inappropriate. But such laws DO protect against blatant hardliners
and their propaganda, who generally practice the politisation that
Prime Minister Erdogan so loudly condemns these days.
He accuses Sarkozy of fishing for Armenian votes, while omitting
the large number of voters with a Turkish background but a French
passport. The Armenian Genocide has long been recognised by France,
as by many other European states and the European Parliament.
This has been done in view of overwhelming evidence, while in Turkey
archives still remain closed, documents still disappear and journalists
writing about 1915, like Hrant Dink, face the opposite of freedom. The
new French law simply brings the prosecution in line with the earlier
recognition decision. The German Bundestag is allegedly considering
a similar move and should do so.
The European ideal of tolerance needs intolerance vis-a-vis
intolerance. Genocide is the ultimate intolerance. Free democracies
need to be strong in their defence against those who seek to undermine
that freedom.
While the law does not mention Turkey and President Sarkozy even sent
a conciliatory letter to the Turkish government, Erdogan's reaction
was a whole list of threats, calling the law "an unjust action,
which disregards human values and public conscience"... "No one
should doubt our Government's principled approach in this issue"
the MFA refers to the announced retaliation measures.
Such words do not sound like the communication of a mature and
proud nation, it sounds like a vexed child in a sand box, saying
"He started first!". Turkey kills its relations with France and
blames France for it. Instead, Turkey would have had the chance to
run a different policy, even a very nationalistic one (which I would
deem wrong but at least clever): Turkey could have opened the border
with Armenia and with that started a process of debating the issue,
which no international player would have liked to interfere with.
Turkey could state, how ever they classify the "events of 1915", that
this was during the Ottoman Empire and hence only indirectly concerns
modern Turkey. Turkey could have focussed on its national interests
by gaining support from the international community for securing a
deal which limits possible Armenian damage claims and embarking on
a course of a genuine zero-problem-policy with its neighbours.
Instead, that zero-problem-policy has visibly failed all around
and Turkey is today mainly known for being "loud". It destroyed its
interests with the EU and sends enraging and mobilising signals to
the Armenian Diaspora around the world and to its own minorities,
especially to the Kurds in its poorer East.
All this has a high price for Turkey and all this has been dominated
neither by Turkey's Foreign Minister nor by the President. In the
interest of the Turkish nation, you would have to call upon Prime
Minister Erdogan to resign.
And as even long-standing friends of Turkey, like MEP and Turkey
rapporteur Oomen-Ruijten, become publicly more and more frustrated
and critical, France and the EU seem to have little to lose, as long
as Mr Erdogan is in power. The only light comes from the Turkish
intelligentsia, which means that civil society is today our best hope
for saving Turkey's modernisation."
From: A. Papazian