Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

New Testimony Indicates BalıKcı Might Have Been Killed For Being A

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • New Testimony Indicates BalıKcı Might Have Been Killed For Being A

    NEW TESTIMONY INDICATES BALıKCı MIGHT HAVE BEEN KILLED FOR BEING ARMENIAN

    TODAY'S ZAMAN
    01 27 January 2012

    A young man of Armenian descent who was killed while serving in the
    Turkish Armed Forces (TSK) as a conscripted private, which was
    initially believed to be an accident, is likely a hate crime committed
    because of the victim's ethnic background, new testimony from another
    private indicates.

    Pvt. Sevag Å~^ahin Balıkcı was shot dead on Apr. 24, 2011 -- the
    date the Armenian Diaspora has chosen to commemorate the incidents of
    1915 when hundreds of Armenians were killed in the Ottoman Empire. The
    other privates in his unit, stationed in Batman province, and other
    officers testified that Balıkcı was shot accidentally when he was
    "joking around" with a close friend, Kıvanc Agaoglu.

    However, according to a report published in the Sabah daily on Friday,
    one of the privates who witnessed the incident changed his testimony,
    which will likely change the course of the trial of Agaoglu, the
    shooter. The revised testimony was given in late December, according
    to Sabah's report. It wasn't clear why there were no reports on
    it earlier.

    Halil EkÅ~_i, who served in the military during the same period as
    Sevag Balıkcı, in his revised testimony said, "Kıvanc pointed his
    rifle at Sevag and pulled the trigger. His family had asked me to
    testify in his favor," indicating that Agaoglu's family pressured
    him into not describing what really happened.

    They were serving at the Kozluk GumuÅ~_göru Gendarmerie Station at
    the time of the murder.

    The investigators in the initial stage of the probe were trying
    to understand whether Balıkcı was really the victim of a hapless
    accident or a murder committed with full intent. According to the
    soldiers' account, Balıkcı was shot by Agaoglu when they were
    installing a chain-link fence around the gendarmerie station.

    The family, mainly based on suspicions arising from the date of the
    murder, had earlier filed criminal charges against Agaoglu claiming he
    had wanted to kill their son and knew what he was doing when he fired
    his rifle. Agaoglu's lawyers asserted that their client was a very
    close friend of Balıkcı, and his rifle fired by accident. Earlier
    testimony from EkÅ~_i supported this statement.

    However, EkÅ~_i, who testified once again on Dec. 27, 2011, said he
    wanted to change his initial testimony. He said he did not see the
    suspect playing around with the rifle and noted that Agaoglu's uncle,
    Bulent Kaya, had visited him in his hometown and in fact wrote his
    initial testimony with him. He gave his first testimony on Sept. 9,
    2011, in an Aydın court after he was summoned.

    It wasn't clear why he changed his testimony, but the Balıkcı
    family lawyers had requested to hear him again on the grounds that
    they weren't present during the first testimony. This is why EkÅ~_i
    was summoned once again by the Aydın 1st Criminal Court.

    In his latest account, EkÅ~_i told the judge hearing his testimony:
    "I was told by suspect Kıvanc and his family, especially his
    uncle, to testify in his favor. On the day of the incident, we were
    installing chain-link fencing around the station under orders from our
    commanders. As we did our work, at some point, Kıvanc Agaoglu unlocked
    his rifle's safety and directed it at our other friend Sevag Å~^ahin.

    And he fired the rifle. This way, Sevag Å~^ahin was wounded. I do
    not know why Kıvanc fired at Sevag."

Working...
X