Tweet
WHAT PRICE WILL ARMENIAN SYRIANS PAY?
HAKOB BADALYAN
Story from Lragir.am News:
http://www.lragir.am/engsrc/comments26970.html
Published: 20:36:55 - 26/07/2012
Kiro Manoyan, head of the political office of ARF Bureau, says the
Armenian community should stay to live in Syria. He told this to
Radio Liberty. He said the Armenian community must not be allowed
to disappear. Several days earlier the representative of the ARF
Bureau Hrant Margaryan spoke about the necessity to keep the Armenian
community in Syria intact.
In fact, the presence of an Armenian community in any country is
important. An influential Armenian community may help promote the
foreign policy of Armenia, the interests of Armenia abroad.
At the same time, the problems must be viewed specifically, not only
in terms of the situation but also the long-term interest.
>From this point of view, what are the possible scenarios? What if
a deep analysis of the situation makes think that the Armenians in
Syria as an organized sheer community have nothing to do there and
must leave before they are exposed?
Are there any studies underlying, for instance, the ARF statement
about the need to preserve the Armenian community or the Ministry of
Diaspora official's statement that there is no need to send additional
flights to Syria or the government campaign claiming that the Armenian
community in Syria is not in danger? What period of time has been
studied, what will be the status quo, what is the attitude to the
Armenians, is the situation under control in Syria?
What if the situation in Syria follows the scenario of Iraq and the
military actions are followed by terrorist attacks taking lives of
people every day? What will the situation of the Armenian community
be? What problems will the Armenian community in Syria attend to
except for saving their property by risking their lives?
Are there any relevant studies and prognoses? What will be if Assad
leaves? What if Assad does not leave? Who believes this? How can he
stay if he decides to stay? What is the attitude of the Armenians to
the armed opposition to Assad if the Armenian community has always
been one of the social and even ethnic supports of the regime in Syria?
In fact, a policy of controllable chaos seems to be conducted in the
Arab world. According to most analyses and assessments, the problem
is Iran, and the West is coming to Iran step by step.
However, in this case the question occurs what Tunisia had to do
with Iran. Of course, one can even find a connection between Barbados
and Iran but perhaps it is more probable that the problem of Iran is
moved into a wider process of the Arab world than the contrary.
Apparently, this process resolves an important issue of shrinking
resources of the Arab world when not only their possible centralization
and formation of a geopolitical pole and a serious challenge for
the Western civilization is prevented but also the resources which
generated the danger of centralization run out.
The processes underway in the Arab world can be viewed as a measure
undertaken in the context of the systemic crisis in the Western
civilization, a so-called crisis measure. It is not only trade in
weapons and the subsequent occurrence of an economic incentive.
The West, having appeared in a systemic and civilization crisis,
knowing that it will take long to overcome the crisis and ups and
downs are expected, is trying to generate a controllable chaos in
the Arab-Muslim world not to allow the existing resources use the
Western crisis and set forth additional challenges to the west which
is already facing a need for complex systemic reforms.
Do the Armenian communities have anything to do in this situation
of controllable chaos and do they face any other prospect apart
from being slaughtered? Do the forces upholding preservation of the
Armenian community have more or less plausible scenarios which prove
the necessity for preservation of the Armenian community?
HAKOB BADALYAN
Story from Lragir.am News:
http://www.lragir.am/engsrc/comments26970.html
Published: 20:36:55 - 26/07/2012
Kiro Manoyan, head of the political office of ARF Bureau, says the
Armenian community should stay to live in Syria. He told this to
Radio Liberty. He said the Armenian community must not be allowed
to disappear. Several days earlier the representative of the ARF
Bureau Hrant Margaryan spoke about the necessity to keep the Armenian
community in Syria intact.
In fact, the presence of an Armenian community in any country is
important. An influential Armenian community may help promote the
foreign policy of Armenia, the interests of Armenia abroad.
At the same time, the problems must be viewed specifically, not only
in terms of the situation but also the long-term interest.
>From this point of view, what are the possible scenarios? What if
a deep analysis of the situation makes think that the Armenians in
Syria as an organized sheer community have nothing to do there and
must leave before they are exposed?
Are there any studies underlying, for instance, the ARF statement
about the need to preserve the Armenian community or the Ministry of
Diaspora official's statement that there is no need to send additional
flights to Syria or the government campaign claiming that the Armenian
community in Syria is not in danger? What period of time has been
studied, what will be the status quo, what is the attitude to the
Armenians, is the situation under control in Syria?
What if the situation in Syria follows the scenario of Iraq and the
military actions are followed by terrorist attacks taking lives of
people every day? What will the situation of the Armenian community
be? What problems will the Armenian community in Syria attend to
except for saving their property by risking their lives?
Are there any relevant studies and prognoses? What will be if Assad
leaves? What if Assad does not leave? Who believes this? How can he
stay if he decides to stay? What is the attitude of the Armenians to
the armed opposition to Assad if the Armenian community has always
been one of the social and even ethnic supports of the regime in Syria?
In fact, a policy of controllable chaos seems to be conducted in the
Arab world. According to most analyses and assessments, the problem
is Iran, and the West is coming to Iran step by step.
However, in this case the question occurs what Tunisia had to do
with Iran. Of course, one can even find a connection between Barbados
and Iran but perhaps it is more probable that the problem of Iran is
moved into a wider process of the Arab world than the contrary.
Apparently, this process resolves an important issue of shrinking
resources of the Arab world when not only their possible centralization
and formation of a geopolitical pole and a serious challenge for
the Western civilization is prevented but also the resources which
generated the danger of centralization run out.
The processes underway in the Arab world can be viewed as a measure
undertaken in the context of the systemic crisis in the Western
civilization, a so-called crisis measure. It is not only trade in
weapons and the subsequent occurrence of an economic incentive.
The West, having appeared in a systemic and civilization crisis,
knowing that it will take long to overcome the crisis and ups and
downs are expected, is trying to generate a controllable chaos in
the Arab-Muslim world not to allow the existing resources use the
Western crisis and set forth additional challenges to the west which
is already facing a need for complex systemic reforms.
Do the Armenian communities have anything to do in this situation
of controllable chaos and do they face any other prospect apart
from being slaughtered? Do the forces upholding preservation of the
Armenian community have more or less plausible scenarios which prove
the necessity for preservation of the Armenian community?