Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Vardan Ghukasyan's And Burnash's Past

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Vardan Ghukasyan's And Burnash's Past

    VARDAN GHUKASYAN'S AND BURNASH'S PAST
    Naira Hayrumyan

    Story from Lragir.am News:
    http://www.lragir.am/engsrc/country26967.html
    Published: 14:17:28 - 26/07/2012

    In his response to the Republican Member of Parliament Ashot Aghababyan
    - Burnash, Mayor of Gyumri Vardan Ghukasyan actually reported a
    crime. He stated that being the Mayor he twice "made" Aghababyan an MP.

    There will hardly be an article in the Crime Code of Armenia which
    could punish the Mayor who "made someone an MP". Perhaps because it
    is an accepted practice - head of the municipal authorities often
    decide the outcome of national elections.

    This crime report didn't discredit Aghababyan but Ghukasyan himself
    and the electoral system. Actually, he acknowledged that he has broken
    the right of the citizens to free election forcing them to vote for
    a person whom he describes as "without kith or kin". He discredited
    the proud Gyumri residents who tolerated such a Mayor plus voted for
    such an unworthy person.

    The law enforcers of Armenia should react to Vardan Ghukasyan's
    statement otherwise they will confirm the illegality of Ashot
    Aghababyan's election, as well as Vardan Ghukasyan's right to "make
    someone a deputy".

    There is one more nuance in this story. Vardan Ghukasyan calls
    Aghababyan a person "without kith or kin". "Who were you?" -
    this expression is of common use within the ruling circles and
    intellectual-elite marginalized castes.

    Decisions in Armenia are made by people of suspicious and not-elite
    past, who got rich either on account of the war or the post-soviet
    privatization, or criminal deals. It is rare to find within the
    so-called elite people those, who have a solid educational resource,
    in the end, hereditary aristocracy. This aristocracy, as a rule,
    feels at home in the country and works for its well-being, and does
    not pursue the goals of plundering as soon as possible, because
    tomorrow they can be thrown out of the "elite". No one can take away
    the real aristocracy.

    It is very important to have aristocracy, elite traditions at least
    to have something to compare the emerging nouveau riche with. Whom
    Vardan Ghukasyan compares Aghababyan with calling the latter without
    kith or kin? With himself? Is there any origin of hereditary and
    aristocratic pride in him? Or prestige is not determined by aristocracy
    and intelligence, but by the position in the criminal world? And if he
    made Aghababyan a deputy, so he is above it the scale of the thieves.

    A nation should not allow being governed by "semi-literate people",
    said recently the Russian businessman Levon Hayrapetyan of Artsakh
    origin. We can add that the nation should be ashamed of semi-literate
    rulers, who are unable to connect two words, who listen to low-standard
    music, have nicknames and are guided thieves laws.

    Someday the nation will feel ashamed, and let this moment come as
    quickly as possible.



    From: Emil Lazarian | Ararat NewsPress
Working...
X