Tweet
FOREIGN MINISTER NALBANDIAN'S ADDRESS AND ANSWERS TO QUESTIONS DURING THE PRESS CONFERENCE WITH EAMON GILMORE, OSCE CHAIRMAN-IN-OFFICE, DEPUTY PRIME MINISTERAND FOREIGN MINISTER OF IRELAND
http://www.mfa.am/en/press-conference/item/2012/06/12/osce_cio_perss/
12.06.2012
Hello,
I am pleased to welcome the OSCE Chairperson-in-Office, Ireland's
Deputy Prime Minister and Foreign Minister Eamon Gilmore. Regardless
of the geographical distance between our countries, centuries-old
deep relations were established between our peoples.
Armenia gives importance to the development, fostering and enlargement
of relations with Ireland.
We had a very fruitful meeting with Mr. Gilmore last year in Dublin and
we used the opportunity of this visit to discuss a wide range of topics
concerning bilateral relations, regional and international issues.
During the elections for the OSCE presidency, Armenia supported
Ireland's candidacy and I reaffirmed that Armenia will support all
those steps which the Irish chairmanship will initiate to make the
OSCE a more efficient and vibrant organisation.
We discussed the cooperation of Armenia with the OSCE in the
organisation's three levels of activities.
We discussed the Nagorno-Karabakh issue, as one of the key issues on
the agenda of Ireland's Chairmanship is related to the strengthening
of peace and stability in the South Caucasus, which is undoubtedly
very important for our country.
I presented Mr. Gilmore the recent developments in the settlement
of the Nagorno-Karabakh issue. We share the opinion that there is no
alternative to peaceful settlement of the Nagorno-Karabakh issue. In
this respect, Armenia's position is line with that of the international
community reflected in the statements of OSCE Minsk Group co-chairing
countries' Presidents in L'Aquila in 2009, in Muskoka in 2010 and in
Deauville in 2011.
Today we will have an opportunity to continue our discussions on
other issues as well.
Thank you very much, and please Mr. Gilmor, the floor I yours.
Q&A
Armnews TV: Mr. Nalbandian, recently the Turkish Foreign Minister
made a statement where he expressed his concerns about the loss of
Azeri soldiers, and he added also that despite the efforts exerted
by the OSCE Minsk Group, the Armenian side is not yet reacting. How
would you comment that statement? Thank you.
Edward Nalbandian: The statement of the Turkish Foreign Minister,
according to which as if he mourns the loss of only the Azeri
servicemen as a result of the latest incidents, sounds racist. We
have never heard him being concerned about the killings of Armenian
soldiers as a result of subversive acts from the Azeri side. While
the international community condemns the bloody incidents and urges
the sides to refrain from the use of force, these sort of Turkish
statements in fact encourage Azerbaijanis' new subversive acts.
While Azerbaijan is not only not reacting, but is continuously
rejecting the Minsk Group Co-Chairs' proposals on the withdrawal of
snipers from the line of contact, the consolidation of ceasefire, the
creation of investigation mechanisms of the violations of ceasefire,
the Turkish side is attempting to shift this responsibility of the
Azerbaijani side on the others. The Turkish side is pretending as
if it is unaware whether of whose fault a progress was not made in
Kazan on reaching an agreement of the basic principles.
20 years ago Armenia did not oppose Turkey's inclusion as a member of
the Minsk Group, because some countries expected that Turkey would
be unbiased and would have its input in the peaceful settlement of
the conflict. The passing 20 years showed that Turkey is not only
non-neutral, but through its stance harms the Nagorno-Karabakh
settlement process. A question arises: is Turkey's such behavior
compatible with its being a member of the Minsk Group?
Armenpress News Agency: I have a question for Mr. Gilmore. Mr.
Gilmore, the incidents on the line of contact and on the border
between Armenia and Azerbaijan got intensified after Azerbaijan,
albeit through use of blackmail, succeeded in failing the creation
of investigation mechanisms for ceasefire violations on the line of
contact. Is Ireland, during its Chairmanship in the OSCE, undertaking
a commitment to do everything possible so that those investigation
mechanisms were created?
Will Ireland push to the end in this issue, despite Azerbaijan's
blackmailing?
Edward Nalbandian: I would like to add, that Armenia has been and
is for the creation of the mechanisms of investigation and, unlike
Azerbaijan, when we agree on something, we do not backtrack on the
following day.
I should recall that corresponding elements of the establishment
of mechanisms are included in the relevant statements made by the
Presidents of Armenia, Russia and Azerbaijan in March 2011 and January
2012 in Sochi. We respect those agreements and we are for the creation
of the mechanisms.
From: Baghdasarian
http://www.mfa.am/en/press-conference/item/2012/06/12/osce_cio_perss/
12.06.2012
Hello,
I am pleased to welcome the OSCE Chairperson-in-Office, Ireland's
Deputy Prime Minister and Foreign Minister Eamon Gilmore. Regardless
of the geographical distance between our countries, centuries-old
deep relations were established between our peoples.
Armenia gives importance to the development, fostering and enlargement
of relations with Ireland.
We had a very fruitful meeting with Mr. Gilmore last year in Dublin and
we used the opportunity of this visit to discuss a wide range of topics
concerning bilateral relations, regional and international issues.
During the elections for the OSCE presidency, Armenia supported
Ireland's candidacy and I reaffirmed that Armenia will support all
those steps which the Irish chairmanship will initiate to make the
OSCE a more efficient and vibrant organisation.
We discussed the cooperation of Armenia with the OSCE in the
organisation's three levels of activities.
We discussed the Nagorno-Karabakh issue, as one of the key issues on
the agenda of Ireland's Chairmanship is related to the strengthening
of peace and stability in the South Caucasus, which is undoubtedly
very important for our country.
I presented Mr. Gilmore the recent developments in the settlement
of the Nagorno-Karabakh issue. We share the opinion that there is no
alternative to peaceful settlement of the Nagorno-Karabakh issue. In
this respect, Armenia's position is line with that of the international
community reflected in the statements of OSCE Minsk Group co-chairing
countries' Presidents in L'Aquila in 2009, in Muskoka in 2010 and in
Deauville in 2011.
Today we will have an opportunity to continue our discussions on
other issues as well.
Thank you very much, and please Mr. Gilmor, the floor I yours.
Q&A
Armnews TV: Mr. Nalbandian, recently the Turkish Foreign Minister
made a statement where he expressed his concerns about the loss of
Azeri soldiers, and he added also that despite the efforts exerted
by the OSCE Minsk Group, the Armenian side is not yet reacting. How
would you comment that statement? Thank you.
Edward Nalbandian: The statement of the Turkish Foreign Minister,
according to which as if he mourns the loss of only the Azeri
servicemen as a result of the latest incidents, sounds racist. We
have never heard him being concerned about the killings of Armenian
soldiers as a result of subversive acts from the Azeri side. While
the international community condemns the bloody incidents and urges
the sides to refrain from the use of force, these sort of Turkish
statements in fact encourage Azerbaijanis' new subversive acts.
While Azerbaijan is not only not reacting, but is continuously
rejecting the Minsk Group Co-Chairs' proposals on the withdrawal of
snipers from the line of contact, the consolidation of ceasefire, the
creation of investigation mechanisms of the violations of ceasefire,
the Turkish side is attempting to shift this responsibility of the
Azerbaijani side on the others. The Turkish side is pretending as
if it is unaware whether of whose fault a progress was not made in
Kazan on reaching an agreement of the basic principles.
20 years ago Armenia did not oppose Turkey's inclusion as a member of
the Minsk Group, because some countries expected that Turkey would
be unbiased and would have its input in the peaceful settlement of
the conflict. The passing 20 years showed that Turkey is not only
non-neutral, but through its stance harms the Nagorno-Karabakh
settlement process. A question arises: is Turkey's such behavior
compatible with its being a member of the Minsk Group?
Armenpress News Agency: I have a question for Mr. Gilmore. Mr.
Gilmore, the incidents on the line of contact and on the border
between Armenia and Azerbaijan got intensified after Azerbaijan,
albeit through use of blackmail, succeeded in failing the creation
of investigation mechanisms for ceasefire violations on the line of
contact. Is Ireland, during its Chairmanship in the OSCE, undertaking
a commitment to do everything possible so that those investigation
mechanisms were created?
Will Ireland push to the end in this issue, despite Azerbaijan's
blackmailing?
Edward Nalbandian: I would like to add, that Armenia has been and
is for the creation of the mechanisms of investigation and, unlike
Azerbaijan, when we agree on something, we do not backtrack on the
following day.
I should recall that corresponding elements of the establishment
of mechanisms are included in the relevant statements made by the
Presidents of Armenia, Russia and Azerbaijan in March 2011 and January
2012 in Sochi. We respect those agreements and we are for the creation
of the mechanisms.
From: Baghdasarian