Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

ANKARA: The Nagorno-Karabakh Resolution Process at the Glance

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • ANKARA: The Nagorno-Karabakh Resolution Process at the Glance

    Journal of Turkish Weekly
    June 14 2012


    The Nagorno-Karabakh Resolution Process at the Glance

    Thursday, 14 June 2012

    by Nasrin Suleymanli, Contributor

    2012 will be symbolized by the electoral process of the co-chairs of
    the Minsk Group, which is involved in the resolution process of the
    Nagorno-Karabakh problem. Thus, the problem in the region has been
    frozen for a while. France and Russia have elected their presidents.
    According to one analytical calculation, the U.S. electoral process
    will result in Obama's victory. The expert also predicted a more
    decisive Obama victory if he can thoroughly alleviate fears regarding
    Iran. However, Obama's policy toward the South Caucasus will not
    differ from Bush's politics. Currently, the Middle East and Pacific
    regions are more important for the U.S. than the South Caucasus.

    Over the past few years, when Obama and Medvedev had been elected,
    there was hope that the intentions of leaders related to the
    resolution of the conflict in the region would not just be in their
    areas of curiosity but also within areas of international concern. It
    was thought that their approaches to the conflict could be in a
    different format. Within the strong cooperation of France and the
    U.S., during his period in the Russian presidency, Medvedev organized
    nine official trilateral visits with Armenian and Azerbaijani leaders.
    As we remember, after August 2008 Russia tried to play the main role
    as a stabilizer in the region. Despite that, nothing happened.

    The recent visit of U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton to the
    South Caucasus promised to apply pressure on the Minsk Group in the
    resolution process of the NK conflict in the coming June 18 Paris
    visit of the conflicting sides' leaders. Additionally, Clinton was
    intent on Russia's immediate withdrawal of armed troops from the
    territory of the South Caucasus. Russia did not remain silent and
    reacted immediately. A confrontation on the border of Armenia and
    Azerbaijan erupted again. Almost ten soldiers from both sides were
    killed, and some hospitalized. Russia even began to test its missiles
    .Let us note that Russia withdrew its 25,000 armed troops from
    Chechnya to Dagestan, closer to the border of the South Caucasus.
    Despite this, it has large amounts of military equipment and troops in
    Armenia. Even the military spokesman, Col. Igor Gorbul, told that
    Russian fighter jets stationed at a base in Armenia have conducted
    about 300 training flights since the beginning of 2012, and right now
    have increased the number of flying hours by more than 20 percent from
    last year.

    Next year, Armenia and Azerbaijan's presidential elections will start
    their electoral process and distract from the conflict resolution
    process. But the main maneuver will be in 2014 with the new active
    co-chairs of the Minsk Group and newly-elected presidents of the
    conflicting sides. It will be up to them to draw a roadmap to further
    the resolution process. And taking into consideration the Iran-Israel
    confrontation in the region, it is possible to predict a surprise
    change in the NK conflict resolution process within the Caucasus
    context. The third decade of the Nagorno Karabakh conflict promises an
    altering of the status of quo.

    Thursday, 14 June 2012

    Journal of Turkish Weekly

    http://www.turkishweekly.net/news/137298/the-nagorno-karabakh-resolution-process-at-the-glance.html

Working...
X