Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Theft of State Property: Why Law Enforcement Remains Unconcerned

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Theft of State Property: Why Law Enforcement Remains Unconcerned

    Theft of State Property: Hetq Asks Why Law Enforcement Remains Unconcerned
    Edik Baghdasaryan

    HETQ
    11:27, June 15, 2012

    With their inaction, Armenian law enforcement is legalizing the
    pillage of the state.

    As we've stated before, paintings, sculptures, antique carpets and
    jewellery are vanishing from museums under the jurisdiction of the
    Ministry of Culture.

    No one has been brought to justice. You wonder why Armenian law
    enforcement immediately becomes paralyzed when such incidents take
    place. One gets the impression that they have been instructed to fold
    their hands and not launch criminal charges.

    As reported in Hetq, sculptures have been repeatedly stolen from the
    Armenia's National Gallery, but no criminal charges have been filed.

    No criminal investigation was launched after 8 paintings of Minas
    Avetisyan vanished from the Exhibition Center. These paintings belong
    to the Armenian state. What has been stolen belongs to the citizens of
    Armenia.

    Now, let me bring two additional examples of the theft of state property.

    Harutyun Hovhannisyan's graphic works, Ayrivank (registration#2955b)
    and Zangezur (registration 8880) that were presented to the Ministry
    of Culture in 2002, have been missing since 2005.

    I am bringing this to the attention of RA Prosecutor Genral Aghvan
    Hovsepyan given that Article 27 (Filing a Claim for the Protection of
    State Interests) of the `Law on Prosecution' states:
    The filing by a prosecutor of a claim for the protection of state
    interests shall include:

    Filing a claim for compensation of pecuniary damage inflicted upon the
    state as a direct consequence of a crime in the frameworks of criminal
    procedure.

Working...
X