Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

The EU Is Suffering From 'Enlargement Fatigue'

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • The EU Is Suffering From 'Enlargement Fatigue'

    THE EU IS SUFFERING FROM 'ENLARGEMENT FATIGUE'
    by Justin Stares

    http://www.publicserviceeurope.com/article/1600/the-eu-is-suffering-from-enlargement-fatigue
    06 March 2012

    With the Balkans about to be brought into the European Union fold,
    there are few other countries with a realistic chance of joining

    Who will be next to join the European Union's list of candidate
    countries? When the mopping up operation in the Balkans is complete,
    there are very few real suitors left. After the recent green light
    from the European Council, Serbia is on its merry way towards
    full membership. Belgrade joins neighbour Montenegro as an approved
    candidate and negotiations with Montenegro are expected to start this
    summer. Albania, too, is fast approaching the EU's required standards,
    according to the European Commission. While currently a "potential
    candidate", Albania is expected to be the next country to make the
    approved list.

    The more problematic Balkan states will also no doubt become members
    in the medium term. Macedonia, or more precisely the Former Yugoslav
    Republic of Macedonia, is officially a candidate country - though its
    negotiation timetable has been held up by a name dispute with Greece.

    Kosovo and Serbia will have to kiss and make up at some point; Kosovo
    is a potential EU candidate. Bottom of the class for the moment comes
    Bosnia and Herzegovina. According to commission insiders, Bosnia is
    going backwards rather than forwards.

    After which, the enlargement train looks likely to grind to a
    complete halt. The United Kingdom and others have promoted the
    candidacy of Turkey - but hostility in France, Germany and Austria
    is such that Ankara's chances must be close to zero. "Turkey is not
    always Europe's ally," says Jana Kobzova, a fellow of the European
    Council on Foreign Relations think tank. "They took on the role of
    mediator with Iran without consulting the EU or the United States,"
    Kobzova tells PublicServiceEurope.com.

    Money and the free movement of people are the principal attractions
    for EU candidates. While Brussels has become less generous over time,
    the amount set aside for "pre-accession assistance" - ~@14 billion
    between 2014 and 2020 - is not to be sniffed at. Cash is on the other
    hand not an issue for Norway and Switzerland, whose governments are
    so rich they can afford to pick and choose the aspects of European
    integration they fancy - while remaining on the outside. Norwegian
    voters have made it very clear that they prefer things this way.

    Lichtenstein, San Marino, Monaco, Andorra and the Vatican City
    state - more suburbs than countries really - also gain from staying
    out. They are close enough to the EU core to reap the benefits of
    their tax-haven status. Tiny Iceland, despite its recent travails,
    is eligible to join if its people so desire.

    Part of Russia lies in Europe. Could it one day join? Sadly not.

    Former commission president Romano Prodi said Russia was simply "too
    big" for the EU. He invented this previously unheard of membership
    criterion - population size - when politicians in Moscow began to
    express an interest. That leaves a few question marks hanging over
    countries that will probably never achieve full membership, though
    they do have an outside chance. Moldova could be absorbed easily by
    the EU, though Kobzova points out that this would set a precedent
    for neighbouring Ukraine. "Small countries like Moldova fall victim
    to the problems of their bigger neighbours," she says. Enlargement
    enthusiasts in Britain sometimes talk of Ukraine as a potential union
    member. But would member states want to give Ukraine's 45 million
    population access to their job markets and social benefits? While it
    would be in the long-term strategic interest of Poland to bring Ukraine
    into the family, the probability of any application succeeding is slim.

    With Belarus stuck in the dark ages and Georgia's border problems much
    too unsettling, the list of potential candidates is almost exhausted.

    The remaining two European countries - Armenia and Azerbaijan - almost
    never get a mention. Contacted by PublicServiceEurope.com, a diplomat
    from Azerbaijan's EU embassy in Brussels laughs out loud when asked
    if his country is headed for membership. "Are you inviting us to join?"

    he says. After calming down, he continues, on condition of anonymity:
    "We are not ready for the EU and the EU is not ready for us. There is
    a lot of enlargement fatigue in Brussels". One of Armenia's foreign
    policy priorities is "integration with the European family", though it
    too has issues in Nagorno-Karabakh that Europe will not want to import.

    Enlargement optimists in North Africa and the Middle East have
    suggested that the EU may one day expand beyond its geographic base.

    Morocco actually applied for membership in the 1980s. Enlargement of
    this kind is, however, considered by most to be a flight of fancy.

    Whereas the EU is in theory open to all democratic European countries,
    apart from Russia, there is another unspoken membership criterion:
    wealth. Poor countries are less eligible than rich countries. What
    does this mean for Scotland, should it secede from the UK? Nobody,
    not even Brussels insiders, knows the answer to this question.

Working...
X