Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Getting Rid Of The Imperialist Gaze: Georgian Films With Armenian, A

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Getting Rid Of The Imperialist Gaze: Georgian Films With Armenian, A

    GETTING RID OF THE IMPERIALIST GAZE: GEORGIAN FILMS WITH ARMENIAN, AZERI CHARACTERS DISCUSSED IN YEREVAN

    epress.am
    03.26.2012

    The audience in Yerevan mainly enjoyed the Georgian films with the word
    "Karabakh" in the title but which were not about the conflict.

    The audience was rapt with attention and in the discussion following
    the screening recalled even the smallest details and scenes from the
    films. However, the audience never did admit its admiration of the
    films, preferring instead to focus on the "mistakes" of the filmmakers
    of Trip to Karabakh 1 and 2, "Armenians being shown as uneducated"
    and the "deliberate distortion of political realities." In any case,
    this Karabakh was not about Armenians or Azeris. Simply a film is
    shot in Georgia and there is no pretending that no one other than
    them lives in their place of residence. But more on that below.

    The screening was part of the STOP Festival organized by the Caucasus
    Center for Peace-Making Initiatives, which in 2010, was pressured for
    its attempt to organize a screening of Azerbaijani films in Armenia.

    On several occasions, human rights activist and festival organizer
    Center Georgy Vanyan was refused space to screen the films, as a
    result of which the screenings were held in people's homes.

    The first "trip" - "From Mimino till Today: Transformation of the
    South Caucasus" - was made by Conservative Party of Armenia leader
    Mikael Hayrapetyan and human rights activist Luiza Poghosyan.

    Images of modern Georgian cinema broke out of Caucasians' Soviet model
    of behavior. Hayrapetyan emphasized that Georgia, unlike Armenia,
    has taken a step forward in getting rid of the rules imposed on it by
    imperialism. He saw this in the film, which he didn't consider from
    an artistic point of view, and he sees this when travelling to Georgia.

    According to the politician, it is proposed Mimino and Rubik jan
    (characters in the 1977 Soviet film "Mimino", pictured below) to get
    into a stupid fight about the best water and dolma in the world and to
    compete in a restaurant for the right to request a song from mediocre
    musicians. Hayrapetyan was sure that the discussion of pressing issues
    and the colonialists' policies would turn careless South Caucasians
    into dissidents and lead them straight to the gulag.

    Human rights defender Luiza Poghosyan, in turn, recalled Zurab
    Tsereteli's "monument to Georgian-Russian-Armenian friendship"
    (pictured below) dedicated to the main characters of "Mimino" (played
    by Georgian actor Vakhtang Kikabidze, Russian actor Eugene Leonov,
    and Armenian actor Frunzik Lazarian), which was banned in Moscow and
    was instead erected in 2011 in Tbilisi's Armenian quarter. A "copy"
    of this work was erected in Dilijan, Armenia, the same year. In
    both sculptures, the Russian actor stands between the Armenian and
    Georgian actors.

    In Tbilisi, the monument was erected in Avlabari (Havlabar). The
    opening ceremony was attended by Georgian President Mikail Saakashvili
    and his wife. There was also a protest of about 10 people shouting
    "Stop Zurab!" Poghosyan said she would join the protest against
    reinstating Soviet traditions of Armenian-Georgian mediated relations.

    The Russian reporter in the film "Trip to Karabakh" regularly asks
    the Georgian guy who accidentally finds himself among Armenians
    also freed from Azerbaijani captivity, "Who are you? How did you get
    here? Do Georgians like Armenians?" He answers, "Leave me alone. What
    business is it of yours? We'll deal with our issues ourselves!" Asked
    "Don't you like Russians?", Gio says, "I don't like scoundrels." But
    then they have sex.

    Poghosyan also pointed out, "it seems the images of Armenians are
    cut out of cardboard." Georgians' contact with Armenians as such
    doesn't occur, while Georgians' contact with Azerbaijani soldiers is
    more human, despite the beatings on the first day of captivity. The
    Armenians call their new quiet comrade "brother" and drink toasts
    to their ancestors of the Christian Caucasus, but criticize his
    country for the civil war, for the fact that "Georgians are shooting
    at Georgians." He seems free to do whatever he wants but in fact is
    under constant supervision. In the end, he takes the Russian reporter
    hostage, grabs two Azerbaijani prisoners of war and flees to save
    his friend. One of the Armenians says after him, "I told you he was
    a son of a bitch."

    During the discussion following the film, the comments began with
    the fact that the film was easy to watch, the characters were well
    developed (except from the Armenians, it seems). When audience members
    began to analyze the film from the view of the Georgian filmmakers'
    sympathies to one side of the Karabakh conflict, they approached the
    minute issues that can be seen if only this aspect of the film is
    observed. For example, a secondary school teacher said that Armenians
    in Azerbaijani captivity had cigarettes, and there were no signs
    of beating on their faces, while Azerbaijani soldiers in Armenian
    captivity asked for something to eat and were severely beaten.

    Along the same line, the filmmakers can be accused of having
    anti-Armenian sentiments: the Azerbaijani soldiers have access
    to drugs, they eat kebab (while Armenians eat canned food), their
    commanders are former suppliers (while in the case of Armenians, they
    are professional soldiers, having fought in Azerbaijan), and so on...

    >From now until Apr. 8 the films will be shown and discussed in Gyumri,
    Vanadzor, Noyemberyan and Chambarak.

Working...
X