Tweet
CITY OF CORRUPTION
JAMES HAKOBYAN
Story from Lragir.am News:
http://www.lragir.am/engsrc/comments25586.html
Published: 11:02:09 - 27/03/2012
On the eve, another act of logging was reported in Ajapnyak county
of Yerevan. Over ten big trees were cut in one night.
The city hall condemned this act, at the same time informing that
the land with the trees was a private property.
The boutiques installed in Mashtots Park were also private property
which earlier rested on the pavement of Abovyan Street. By the way,
Mayor Margaryan carelessly tried to remind the active citizens fighting
for Mashtots Park about the fundamental importance of the right to
property in the life of the state.
However, they reminded Taron Margaryan that during the tenure of his
diseased father, Prime Minister Andranik Margaryan, the residents
of Yerevan downtown were evicted forcefully from their homes where
later the government built the empty buildings of North Avenue.
Most buildings which were built by way of outrageous violations of
urban planning and environmental rules are private property. The
ownership of this property was issued, drafted, established in one
government agency or another.
The question is who issued, in return for what, how. How did some
people get the right to property on the pavement of Abovyan Street,
others to the trees in Ajapnyak, some people invaded the orchards
of Yerevan.
Which mayor issued the right to property with violations of urban
and environmental regulations? Which chief architect, which minister,
prime minister, president permitted the mutation of Yerevan, dividing
it into estates of several economic and ruling clans?
Why doesn't the present government of Armenia try to disclose the
chain of former decisions? Why does the prosecutor's office and police
inquire into this issue?
The answer is in the mind of the citizens of Yerevan who believe that
these structures will not inquire into this chain because they are also
part of this chain, and the tail of one is under the foot of the other.
Therefore, the question remains open who will investigate and disclose
that Yerevan already stands for corruption, and it is necessary to
count the age of corruption rather than the city because the city
disappeared back in the Soviet years during the "golden age" of
Demirchyan's rule when the mutation of Yerevan started and reached
its culmination in the past decade.
From: Baghdasarian
JAMES HAKOBYAN
Story from Lragir.am News:
http://www.lragir.am/engsrc/comments25586.html
Published: 11:02:09 - 27/03/2012
On the eve, another act of logging was reported in Ajapnyak county
of Yerevan. Over ten big trees were cut in one night.
The city hall condemned this act, at the same time informing that
the land with the trees was a private property.
The boutiques installed in Mashtots Park were also private property
which earlier rested on the pavement of Abovyan Street. By the way,
Mayor Margaryan carelessly tried to remind the active citizens fighting
for Mashtots Park about the fundamental importance of the right to
property in the life of the state.
However, they reminded Taron Margaryan that during the tenure of his
diseased father, Prime Minister Andranik Margaryan, the residents
of Yerevan downtown were evicted forcefully from their homes where
later the government built the empty buildings of North Avenue.
Most buildings which were built by way of outrageous violations of
urban planning and environmental rules are private property. The
ownership of this property was issued, drafted, established in one
government agency or another.
The question is who issued, in return for what, how. How did some
people get the right to property on the pavement of Abovyan Street,
others to the trees in Ajapnyak, some people invaded the orchards
of Yerevan.
Which mayor issued the right to property with violations of urban
and environmental regulations? Which chief architect, which minister,
prime minister, president permitted the mutation of Yerevan, dividing
it into estates of several economic and ruling clans?
Why doesn't the present government of Armenia try to disclose the
chain of former decisions? Why does the prosecutor's office and police
inquire into this issue?
The answer is in the mind of the citizens of Yerevan who believe that
these structures will not inquire into this chain because they are also
part of this chain, and the tail of one is under the foot of the other.
Therefore, the question remains open who will investigate and disclose
that Yerevan already stands for corruption, and it is necessary to
count the age of corruption rather than the city because the city
disappeared back in the Soviet years during the "golden age" of
Demirchyan's rule when the mutation of Yerevan started and reached
its culmination in the past decade.
From: Baghdasarian