Tweet
ROBERT KOCHARYAN: "WHILE GOVERNING THE COUNTRY ONE MUST NOT SET AN AIM TO WIN SOMEBODY"
http://www.yerkirmedia.am/?act=news&lan=en&id=6831
15:31 . 03/05
Today the second Armenian President Robert Kocharyan gave an exclusive
interview to Mediamax.
Armenia will celebrate the 20th anniversary of its independence in a
week. Thank you for having agreed to talk to us about the anniversary
and let us congratulate you on the upcoming holiday.
- Thank you. I would also like to congratulate you and all our
compatriots on the 20th anniversary of independence.
- You were the President of Armenia during 10 years out of 20 years
of independence. Did your perception of an independent statehood
change during these 10 years, conditioned by the gained experience,
change of the scale of the tasks set or other factors?
- Yes, of course it did. First of all, the world itself is changing
fast enough and one has to harmoniously fit in these changes. By the
way, it refers both to the country and to the citizens. Otherwise
you will lag behind. And, of course, the governing experience and
the intuition help quickly choose the direction of reforms, their
speed and depth. The process of globalization already sets definite
parameters of economic policy and ignoring them might be simply fatal
for country's economy. One should grasp the emerging trends and not
catch up with them. Armenia simply must and can develop faster than
the world's average rates.
- You have met with the leaders of largest and most powerful countries,
discussed complicated issues with them and, most likely, not always
managed to come to an agreement. How can the head of a small but
independent country say "No" to the powers that be?
- You shouldn't have any complexes. The size of the country doesn't
mean that its leader is cleverer or more efficient than other
presidents. Yes, they are certainly more powerful due to the political
weight of the country. But it doesn't necessarily mean that they
are your bosses if, of course, you don't perceive them as such. The
most important thing is to build correct, fair, partner relations,
clearly outline the interests of your country and have persuasive
arguments if you disagree with something. For example I have very warm
recollections of my meetings with Vladimir Putin, Jacques Chirac and
Bill Clinton. None of them ever tried to emphasize his superiority.
- The boys and the girls who were born in 1991 are already 20 years
old. This is the generation, which has never seen the Soviet times
and has heard of them only from parents or books. In some 10 or 15
years this generation will play a decisive role in the process of
building of Armenia's future. What can you advise these young people?
I think giving advice is useful only if the addressee realizes that
he needs it. That's why I don't like giving advice. I would rather
wish them to become the example of Armenia's competitive advantage
by their knowledge, energy and creativity.
- Independent Armenia will mark its 50th anniversary in 30 years.
What will it be like then?
I don't know. A little more than 50 years ago, Somali and South Korea
had almost the same GDP per capita and today it's even impossible to
compare these countries. Somali is torn apart by contradictions, the
population is starving, whereas South Korea has become a powerful
industrial country and one of the world leaders by a number of
branches of economy. This is the effective management, the vision of
perspectives and the choice of proper development model. I believe
Armenia has a serious potential to become the most effective country in
the South Caucasus. Time will show how this potential will be realized.
- In conditions of globalization, people's free movement across the
world, development of internet, social networks and technologies,
opinions are more frequently voiced that the conception of an
independent statehood gradually loses its primary meaning and will
finally have a symbolic significance. What do you think, how real
this scenario is?
- The model of the European Union certainly suggests something like
that. But this model is effective only in Europe. It has a pronounced
European character and there will be no such integration anywhere
else in the foreseeable perspective. Yes, nobody is going to reject
national states even in the European Union. I think independent
countries will long be the main subject of the international law.
- Boris Yeltsin and Nursultan Nazarbayev visited Stepanakert 20 years
ago. What do you remember about this visit? Are there any details
still unknown to the general public? What do you think, could this
visit give real results or Azerbaijan was not ready for concessions
and the war was inevitable?
- Yes, I remember this visit very well. Together with Leonard Petrosyan
we conducted negotiations with Boris Yeltsin and Nursultan Nazarbayev
on our vision of the fate of Nagorno Karabakh. There are indeed some
details unknown to the general public. But I don't think the time has
come to speak about them. This was the mediators' sincere attempt
to stop the escalation of the conflict, but I don't think anything
could be changed by that time. The process developed by other logic,
in the context of collapse of the USSR.
http://www.yerkirmedia.am/?act=news&lan=en&id=6831
15:31 . 03/05
Today the second Armenian President Robert Kocharyan gave an exclusive
interview to Mediamax.
Armenia will celebrate the 20th anniversary of its independence in a
week. Thank you for having agreed to talk to us about the anniversary
and let us congratulate you on the upcoming holiday.
- Thank you. I would also like to congratulate you and all our
compatriots on the 20th anniversary of independence.
- You were the President of Armenia during 10 years out of 20 years
of independence. Did your perception of an independent statehood
change during these 10 years, conditioned by the gained experience,
change of the scale of the tasks set or other factors?
- Yes, of course it did. First of all, the world itself is changing
fast enough and one has to harmoniously fit in these changes. By the
way, it refers both to the country and to the citizens. Otherwise
you will lag behind. And, of course, the governing experience and
the intuition help quickly choose the direction of reforms, their
speed and depth. The process of globalization already sets definite
parameters of economic policy and ignoring them might be simply fatal
for country's economy. One should grasp the emerging trends and not
catch up with them. Armenia simply must and can develop faster than
the world's average rates.
- You have met with the leaders of largest and most powerful countries,
discussed complicated issues with them and, most likely, not always
managed to come to an agreement. How can the head of a small but
independent country say "No" to the powers that be?
- You shouldn't have any complexes. The size of the country doesn't
mean that its leader is cleverer or more efficient than other
presidents. Yes, they are certainly more powerful due to the political
weight of the country. But it doesn't necessarily mean that they
are your bosses if, of course, you don't perceive them as such. The
most important thing is to build correct, fair, partner relations,
clearly outline the interests of your country and have persuasive
arguments if you disagree with something. For example I have very warm
recollections of my meetings with Vladimir Putin, Jacques Chirac and
Bill Clinton. None of them ever tried to emphasize his superiority.
- The boys and the girls who were born in 1991 are already 20 years
old. This is the generation, which has never seen the Soviet times
and has heard of them only from parents or books. In some 10 or 15
years this generation will play a decisive role in the process of
building of Armenia's future. What can you advise these young people?
I think giving advice is useful only if the addressee realizes that
he needs it. That's why I don't like giving advice. I would rather
wish them to become the example of Armenia's competitive advantage
by their knowledge, energy and creativity.
- Independent Armenia will mark its 50th anniversary in 30 years.
What will it be like then?
I don't know. A little more than 50 years ago, Somali and South Korea
had almost the same GDP per capita and today it's even impossible to
compare these countries. Somali is torn apart by contradictions, the
population is starving, whereas South Korea has become a powerful
industrial country and one of the world leaders by a number of
branches of economy. This is the effective management, the vision of
perspectives and the choice of proper development model. I believe
Armenia has a serious potential to become the most effective country in
the South Caucasus. Time will show how this potential will be realized.
- In conditions of globalization, people's free movement across the
world, development of internet, social networks and technologies,
opinions are more frequently voiced that the conception of an
independent statehood gradually loses its primary meaning and will
finally have a symbolic significance. What do you think, how real
this scenario is?
- The model of the European Union certainly suggests something like
that. But this model is effective only in Europe. It has a pronounced
European character and there will be no such integration anywhere
else in the foreseeable perspective. Yes, nobody is going to reject
national states even in the European Union. I think independent
countries will long be the main subject of the international law.
- Boris Yeltsin and Nursultan Nazarbayev visited Stepanakert 20 years
ago. What do you remember about this visit? Are there any details
still unknown to the general public? What do you think, could this
visit give real results or Azerbaijan was not ready for concessions
and the war was inevitable?
- Yes, I remember this visit very well. Together with Leonard Petrosyan
we conducted negotiations with Boris Yeltsin and Nursultan Nazarbayev
on our vision of the fate of Nagorno Karabakh. There are indeed some
details unknown to the general public. But I don't think the time has
come to speak about them. This was the mediators' sincere attempt
to stop the escalation of the conflict, but I don't think anything
could be changed by that time. The process developed by other logic,
in the context of collapse of the USSR.