Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Opposition Alleges Irregularities In Armenian Polls

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Opposition Alleges Irregularities In Armenian Polls

    OPPOSITION ALLEGES IRREGULARITIES IN ARMENIAN POLLS

    Institute for War and Peace Reporting (IWPR)
    May 11 2012
    UK

    Election better run than previous ones, but Armenian National Congress
    wants results cancelled.

    By Gayane Lazarian - Caucasus
    CRS Issue 641, 11 May 12

    Armenian opposition parties, which collectively polled about a quarter
    of the vote in the May 6 parliamentary election, have alleged electoral
    fraud. However, analysts say their complaints may be undermined by
    their decision to take up their seats, which can be seen as a de
    facto to recognition of the result.

    The opposition Armenian National Congress, ANC, headed by former
    President Levon Ter-Petrosyan, won just seven per cent of the vote. It
    announced on May 8 that it would be seeking an annulment of the
    results at the Constitutional Court.

    Despite this, Nikol Pashinyan, a senior figure in the party, said
    those elected would still enter parliament.

    Alexander Iskandaryan, director of the Caucasus Institute in Yerevan,
    said the implication was that "the ANC agrees to work with other
    parties, including the [winning] Republican Party".

    The Republican Party, headed by President Serzh Sargsyan, won 44 per
    cent of the vote, while Prosperous Armenia, part of the governing
    coalition until now, came second with 30 per cent. The ANC came third,
    followed by the Dashnaktsutyun, Rule of Law and Heritage parties.

    The ANC's complaints include the fact that President Sargsyan played
    a leading role in campaigning for his Party. The ANC argues that this
    was unconstitutional.

    International observers from the Organisation for Security and
    Cooperation in Europe, OSCE, said that campaigning was "competitive,
    vibrant and largely peaceful".

    "The elections were held under an improved legal framework and
    administered in an overall professional and transparent manner prior
    to election day," the OSCE monitoring team said. "Election day was
    generally calm and peaceful, but marked by organisational problems and
    undue interference in the process, mostly by party representatives."

    The statement did, however, point out that the ruling party used
    its control of the state apparatus to deliver votes to itself, for
    instance by recruiting schoolteachers and pupils for campaign events.

    They also pointed out instances of what appeared to be electoral
    bribery with gifts and food.

    "Multigroup, a company belonging to [Prosperous Armenia] leader Gagik
    Tsarukyan, distributed some 500 tractors during the campaign period.

    The project was mainstreamed into [the party's] campaign," the
    statement said, noting that "electoral contestants and associated
    charitable organisations are prohibited from providing or promising
    goods and services to voters during the campaign period". (For more
    on this issue, see Armenian Parties Make Lavish Jobs and Pay Pledges.)

    The Armenian prosecutor's office has opened three criminal cases
    relating to alleged instances of electoral bribery, one of them in
    reference to the Shengavit constituency in Yerevan. Journalist Gohar
    Veziryan was running for election there, and she accused her opponent
    from Prosperous Armenia of paying off voters.

    Another case related to a constituency in Arabkir district, where Armen
    Matevosyan, also of Prosperous Armenia, was detained in possession
    of 380,000 drams and a notebook containing voters' names.

    "These are just evil machinations which we will deal with. We will
    show that nothing like that happened," Naira Zohrabyan, head of
    Prosperous Armenia's campaign team, said.

    Analysts said electoral bribes undoubtedly had an effect on the
    final outcome.

    "Armenia does not have a mechanism for holding elections. The
    authorities will always falsify the results until society tells them
    not to," Manvel Sargsyan, director of the Armenian Centre for National
    and International Studies, said.

    Another complaint from the ANC was that a stamp placed in voters'
    passports, which was supposed to be indelible for 12 hours to prevent
    repeat voting, could in fact be erased after only an hour or two. Both
    Heritage and the ANC appealed to the election commission on these
    grounds.

    The commission said that from now on, it will use indelible ink that
    remains in voters' passports forever.

    The website www.iditord.am, created to register violations of electoral
    procedure, was targeted by hacker attacks on election day, meaning
    it was unavailable for several hours. However, it has still gathered
    1,000 allegations of breaches of the election law.

    Many journalists reported that they were not able to operate freely
    at polling stations. Nelli Babayan of the Aravot newspaper said three
    men took her phone from her at a polling station in the Davitashen
    district after she filmed an argument between representatives of the
    Republican and Heritage parties.

    "They told me not to film and rudely took my phone away from me. Only
    after I argued with them did they return it," she said.

    Elina Chilingaryan, a reporter for Radio Liberty, told a similar
    story. She said a group of young people broke her video camera after
    she filmed at a polling station in Yerevan's Erebuni district.

    Despite the criticism, which was certainly milder than in past
    elections, the winning Republican Party said the election showed that
    Armenia was a democracy.

    "We have proved that there's no alternative to democratic values in
    Armenia," party spokesman Eduard Sharmazanov said.

    Gayane Lazarian is a reporter for Armenianow.com.


    From: Baghdasarian
Working...
X