Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Eurovision re-opens old wounds in the Caucasus

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Eurovision re-opens old wounds in the Caucasus

    Eurovision re-opens old wounds in the Caucasus

    ISSUE 452

    Published on May 1, 2012 by Onnik Krikorian

    Azerbaijan's hosting of the event on 26 May has caused tensions in the
    region as Armenia pulls out.

    Armenia and Azerbaijan are sworn enemies, locked into a bitter stalemate
    over the disputed territory of Nagorno Karabakh. Around 25,000 people died
    and a million were forced to flee their homes by fighting between the two
    former Soviet republics in the early 1990s. Lasting peace remains elusive,
    despite a ceasefire agreement signed in 1994. Scores of conscripts die each
    year in cross-border skirmishes, but recently the conflict has moved to a
    new and unlikely battleground - the Eurovision Song Contest.

    The kitsch and glitzy music competition has had its fair share of scandals
    since its inception in 1956, despite the original intention to draw
    countries from the European Broadcast Union (EBU) closer together. However,
    the recent inclusion of post-Soviet states has taken national rivalry to
    new heights.

    Armenia entered Eurovision in 2006, followed by Georgia in 2007 and
    Azerbaijan the following year; bitter rivalry between the countries of the
    South Caucasus was evident from the outset.

    In 2009, in the wake of its August 2008 war with Russia, Georgia pulled out
    after its song, apparently mocking President Vladimir Putin, was considered
    `too political'.

    In 2009, Armenia ruffled Azerbaijani feathers with a promotional video that
    featured a statue in the contested Nagorno Karabakh region. This falls
    under Armenian control, but is considered sovereign Azerbaijan by the
    international community. Forced to drop the video, Armenia defiantly
    displayed the offending statue as the main image for its slot during the
    international tele-voting, which was broadcast live to millions.

    Later the same year, in perhaps the worst incident of petty bickering
    between the two countries, 43 Azerbaijanis who voted for Armenia during the
    competition were called in for questioning by National Security Service
    agents.

    No wonder, then, that when Azerbaijan won the competition last year,
    earning itself the right to host the event in its capital, Baku, in 2012,
    alarm bells rang in Armenia. Given that citizens of either country cannot
    visit the other under normal circumstances, additional security guarantees
    for Armenia's delegation were sought from the EBU, which said that it would
    not intervene. Armenia formally withdrew from the competition on 7 March.

    The problems are not confined to a spat with Armenia. Online activists and
    journalists are facing intimidation, detention and imprisonment in
    Azerbaijan, prompting international human rights and other organizations to
    cast doubts on the country's suitability to stage Eurovision in the first
    place. Both local and international groups have flagged up the forced
    eviction of homeowners to construct the Crystal Hall Stadium where
    Eurovision will be held.

    But some activists disagree. They argue that the international spotlight
    may result in much-needed reform and change. For now, however, the omens do
    not look good.

    http://www.newint.org/sections/agenda/2012/05/01/eurovision-tension-azerbaijan-armenia/




    From: A. Papazian
Working...
X