Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Eat Thai, talk Turkish, think Armenian: an encounter

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Eat Thai, talk Turkish, think Armenian: an encounter

    Ekklesia, UK
    Nov 4 2012

    Eat Thai, talk Turkish, think Armenian: an encounter

    By Harry Hagopian
    4 Nov 2012


    On 31 May 2010, when the Armenia-Turkey Protocols of 2009 were still
    very much the buzz of many Armenian and Turkish blogospheres, I wrote
    a short personal reflection entitled `An Armenian-Turkish encounter in
    Germany' (http://www.ekklesia.co.uk/node/12373). It described a
    fortuitous encounter I had with Ajlan, a thirty-something Turkish man
    living in Frankfurt and working for a German security firm, who kindly
    guided me from the airport to the ICE train station that eventually
    took me to Erfurt University.

    I concluded my piece at the time with the following pause for thought:

    Is Ajlan a righteous Turk, as Robert Fisk writes at times in his
    articles? Is he a genocide denialist, or pretty much ignorant of his
    own history? Was he too clever by far or imperceptive? In the final
    analysis, did it matter that much when an Armenian and a Turk met
    awhile in Germany and had a chat despite their sensitivities over real
    history? Germany was a compass point for me, where our deeper humanity
    - with its redeeming points - overtook our separate fears, angers and
    doubts. We were just two men in a train - one helpful, the other
    grateful.

    Fast forward to early September, when I invited a colleague of mine to
    Busaba Eathai, a Thai eatery in London, that serves delicious meals
    and fragrant teas in a cosy and pseudo-ethnic atmosphere. The
    headwaiter who showed us to our table was certainly not Thai let alone
    Oriental, and something in my ear whispered to me that he could well
    be Turkish.

    Although my colleague pooh-poohed the idea and suggested it was the
    Armenian gene in me drawing this conclusion, the inevitable happened
    as it often does when two people meet and strike a conversation. Where
    are you from, and where am I from, and suddenly here was an Armenian
    talking to a Turk. Once our ethnic identities were clarified, I could
    sense a certain uncertainty in him too: we were both thinking whether
    this will be an awkward moment or, worse, an unsuccessful meal? So I
    broke the ice by telling the headwaiter Selman, `Well, we have quite a
    history as two peoples, some of it very painful, very unjust and very
    bloody, but we both also enjoy our cuisine, so let's see if this Thai
    meal could be as good as an Armenian or Turkish one?' He smiled
    broadly and added, `No way, this is good but it does not outmatch
    either Armenian or Turkish cuisine'! And throughout our whole
    succulent meal, Selman kept coming over to ensure we were both
    enjoying ourselves. He even recommended a Turkish restaurant that he
    claimed to be the best in central London.

    Does our interaction mean at all that we have both forgotten our own
    histories and backgrounds? Or more to the point, will I have somehow
    forsaken my own proud history as a descendant of the Armenian genocide
    during WWI? Did I forget that we Armenians - whether in the Diaspora
    or in a young and struggling republic - have grave issues with Turkey
    let alone proxy ones with Azerbaijan over the enclave of
    Nagorno-Karabakh that it claims as its own since 1994? Had I shown
    acute insensitivity in the case of an Azeri military officer,
    Lieutenant Ramil Safarov, who was sentenced to life imprisonment in
    Hungary for murdering Lieutenant Gurgen Markarian of Armenia during a
    NATO course in 2004 and sent back to his homeland on the basis of the
    1983 Strasbourg Convention on the Transfer of Sentenced Persons to
    serve out his sentence in Baku only to be callously pardoned and freed
    by the Azeri authorities - bosom allies of Turkey? Most certainly not!

    But I also feel it is important for us Armenians nearing the 100th
    anniversary of the Armenian genocide in 2015 to start distinguishing
    ordinary Turkish men and women from Turkish officialdom or many of its
    politicised institutions, let alone from Turkey and Azerbaijan. In
    fact, whether in the case of Armenians and Turks, or elsewhere in the
    world where sectarian and ethnic conflicts and animosities abound,
    would we simply not be more faithful to ourselves if we did not export
    a bilious hatred against ordinary people simply because we hold a
    valid grudge against their policies or authorities? Should all
    Israelis be the enemies of all Palestinians? Should all Japanese be
    enemies with all Chinese, or all Armenians enemies of all Turks? Do we
    not have the inner faithful resilience to begin our own process of
    transitional justice by distinguishing between ideas that are crowned
    with a human value from others that are insulted by political
    conflicts?

    My colleague and I enjoyed our Thai meal. But did Selman honestly
    enjoy our banter? Perhaps yes, or perhaps no, but that is not the real
    question that I would ask myself today. Mind you, I am not advocating
    an ex nihilo omnia conversion, and any academic analysis of this topic
    is better addressed by experienced institutions such as the Regional
    Studies Centre (RSC) in Armenia. Besides, one could easily dismiss
    this episode as merely another fluke encounter, just like the one I
    had at Frankfurt airport in 2010. Moreover, it is quite likely that
    many Turks let alone Armenians would not overcome their identity
    issues in such instances but project instead their mottled opinions
    about my encounter or even question its intent.

    Yet, does such a chance encounter not perhaps carry with it a clear
    message? Could one not eat Thai, talk Turkish and still think
    Armenian? Could we not initiate this catharsis without necessarily
    waiting for a quid pro quo from Turks? Would it prove to be
    treacherous, inexcusable or worse, naïve, or would it be a hard test
    that evinces an inner strength to lift up our strong moral fibre?
    After all, and at the end, was it not Martin Luther King, Jr, who
    challenged us all that `Darkness cannot drive out darkness; only light
    can do that? Hate cannot drive out hate; only love can do that'?

    -------------

    © Harry Hagopian is an international lawyer, ecumenist and EU
    political consultant. He also acts as a Middle East and inter-faith
    advisor to the Catholic Bishops' Conference of England & Wales and as
    Middle East consultant to ACEP (Christians in Politics) in Paris.


    From: Baghdasarian
Working...
X