Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Unity, Disunity, Power And Destiny

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Unity, Disunity, Power And Destiny

    Unity, Disunity, Power and Destiny
    By Edmond A. Azadian

    http://www.mirrorspectator.com/2012/11/14/unity-disunity-power-and-destiny/

    Armenians have talked and worried about unity throughout their history
    because they have suffered much as a consequence of disunity. It is
    ironic that the more they talk about the need for unity, the less
    unified and more fragmented they become.

    However, we are united in pain and suffering but divided when we
    face leadership and the pursuit of future goals. Today we are united
    in helping our brothers and sisters caught in the crossfire in the
    Syrian civil strife. Yet, we are divided in most spheres of Armenian
    life. We finally were blessed in having a free and independent Armenia,
    and we are at a loss as to what to do about it. People who aspired to
    independence are now abandoning independent Armenia. The leadership
    at home and abroad is divided. We are witnessing a leadership crisis.

    Our church is still divided for no reason. It seems as though a people
    who had emancipated themselves from centuries of foreign domination
    would seize the historic opportunity and rebuild Armenia and unify
    the church. But there is general apathy throughout the diaspora
    and Armenia and people are no longer alarmed when confronted with
    existential dangers.

    There is too much talk about the depopulation of Armenia, but almost
    no movement to reverse it. Turkey and Azerbaijan have deliberately
    blockaded Armenia to strangulate the last historic portion of Armenian
    existence.

    Armenians are individualists, born out of centuries of oppression which
    have shaped our individual will for survival. Yet we are individualists
    at the expense of our collective goals and a common future. As we try
    to broaden individualism, the most we can achieve is partisan pride,
    countering our universal goals.

    Many "deeds of valor" have been recorded in our church, in the words
    of our historian Moses of Khoren. But it seems that those achievements
    are intended to outdo other levels of hierarchy in the church. For
    example, under His Holiness Catholicos Aram I, crucial projects are
    being developed at the Catholicosate of Antelias, like the publication
    of scholarly books, symposia to preserve the Western Armenian language
    and prizes to encourage writers, etc. But all these endeavors seem to
    be intended to bring credit to Antelias, rather than to the overall
    church, since the leadership in Antelias is in competition with the
    Mother See of Echmiadzin, determined to challenge its authority.

    In Istanbul, the Turkish government has been holding the Armenian
    Patriarchate hostage to use it for its own political ends.

    The authorities used and abused whatever authority Patriarch Mutafian
    had by sending him to European capitals to lobby for Turkey's admission
    into the European Union.While they were using his credibility,
    they cynically terrorized him as well, driving him into near
    catatonia. Indeed, bombs falling in the Patriarchate's neighborhood
    and Hrant Dink's assassination proved to be the straws that broke the
    camel's back. And today, by forbidding the election of a new patriarch,
    their goal is to keep the status of the patriarchate in limbo.

    A different scenario has been playing out in Jerusalem, one of the
    political nerve centers of the world. After the loss of Archbishop
    Torkom Manoogian, the Brotherhood of St. James convened and elected
    Archbishop Aris Shirvanian as Locum Tenens. The aging and frail cleric
    knows as well as the other members of the brotherhood that the burdens
    of the Patriarchate are too heavy a responsibility.

    Yet the Brotherhood could not manage its responsibilities properly with
    a wisdom commensurate to the awesome challenge that the Patriarchate
    is facing. Hopefully, come January 2013, a more circumspect outlook
    will enlighten the brotherhood in order to bring the most capable
    spiritual leader to the throne.

    Here again, the Supreme Patriarch of the Armenian Church as well as the
    government of Armenia were kept in an observer position, in deference
    to the independence and the legal authority of the brotherhood, while
    all the powers in the region have been exerting their influence to
    bring an outcome in line with their political interests.

    The Israeli and Jordanian governments as well as the Palestinian
    Authority have more to say than the heads of the Armenian Church and
    the Armenian government. To demonstrate how deeply the above parties
    are involved in defining the fate of the Armenian Patriarchate in
    Jerusalem it suffices to say that one of the sticking

    points in the failure of the Camp David accord was the status of the
    Armenian Quarter in Jerusalem. Israel demanded to have the Armenian
    Quarter under its jurisdiction and Yasser Arafat refused.

    This outside meddling, barring Armenian authorities from intervening,
    is encouraged by the very by-laws and disposition of the Jerusalem
    brotherhood.

    Thanks to their creative talents, Armenians deserved to become a great
    nation, yet we have ended up with a miniscule homeland. At one time,
    during the reign of Tigranes the Great, the Armenians built an empire.

    Unfortunately that empire fell victim to Tigranes' arrogance; indeed,
    it is recorded that when the Armenian king saw the Roman army advance
    under Lucullus, he said: "If these are the delegates, they are too
    many; if they are the troops, they are too few." Yet the Romans
    arrived and defeated his empire, with the help of his own son, a
    story of betrayal that has been a familiar refrain in Armenian history.

    The Armenian kingdom in Cilicia, which lasted from the 11th to the
    14th centuries, was the setting of rivalries and betrayals among the
    Armenian princes, until the Mamluks overran the kingdom in 1375.

    As we study Ottoman history, we find that the Turks were able to
    preserve a united state by upholding the absolute power of the ruler.

    However, the sultans themselves have been able to maintain that
    absolute power not only through ruthless elimination of any dissent
    by subject nations, but also by eradicating any political challenge
    to authority within their own circles.

    Recently a Turkish historian published the history of the Ottoman
    rulers, revealing that each and every Ottoman sultan, from Fatih
    Sultan Muhammad to Abdul Hamid, had murdered his own children upon
    ascending the throne, to forestall any challenge to their rule.

    The first sultan who murdered both his son and his brother was Sultan
    Murat. The historian has mentioned only one sultan who had spared
    his progenies, Orhan Ghazi (1288-1359.) It is said that Suleiman the
    Magnificent had his children killed before his own eyes by throwing
    them into boiling water.

    Incidentally Suleiman the Magnificent is much admired in the West
    for his conquests and his patronage of the arts.

    In The Prince, Machiavelli defined the prerequisites and parameters
    of power in the most cynical terms. We Armenians have always lacked
    that cynicism, to our own detriment.

    That has been our destiny.

Working...
X