Tweet
ARMENIA BOOSTING RELATIONS WITH BOTH NATO AND RUSSIA
EurasiaNet.org
Nov 19 2012
NY
November 19, 2012 - 12:22am, by Joshua Kucera
Armenia has lately been boosting cooperation with both NATO and
Russia, prompting questions about how far it can play both sides of
the geopolitical conflict.
This fall, Armenia has hosted top NATO officials and the U.S.
secretary of the navy, and in September Armenian units trained by
the U.S. and NATO countries for deployment in international missions,
like that in Afghanistan, conducted an exercise, reported RFE/RL:
[S]ome 600 soldiers of the volunteer unit simulated their participation
in a multinational peacekeeping operation in an exercise watched
by U.S. military instructors. The exercise also involved what the
Armenian Defense Ministry described as a successful "self-appraisal
with NATO standards" by the brigade's Staff Company.
But this fall, Armenia also hosted exercises of the Russia-run
Collective Security Treaty Organization and has signed an agreement
with Russia on joint arms production, a provision of which requires
Armenia to "rely exclusively on Russian-made and supplied weapons,"
writes analyst Richard Giragosian in a piece at Oxford Analytica:
For the first time, Armenia is being excluded from procuring Western
arms, limiting its options and potential partners and, at least in
theory, hindering its pursuit of interoperability with NATO standards.
This has raised questions about Armenia's ability to manage this
balancing act, with Armenian and Western officials -- who are now
regularly asked about it -- saying there is no contradiction in its
ties with the West and Russia. Armenian Public Radio reports on U.S.
ambassador to Armenia John Heffern:
Ambassador Heffern said there is no competition between the United
States and Russia in the region. "We work very closely with each
other, especially on the Minsk Group process," he added.According
to John Hefffern, there is no competition between the collective
Security Treaty organization (CSTO) and NATO. "Armenia has a special
relationship with Russia and the CSTO and has an important partnership
with NATO, the Ambassador said, adding that he sees no conflict
between the two at all.
Armenia's ambassador to NATO says the same:
Armenia's CSTO membership is a part of country's military-political
strategy but it is not damaging the relationship with NATO.
"We believe such cooperation is advantageous to Armenia. The ongoing
reforms are carried out in separate directions with NATO's assistance,"
he said, pointing out defense and security reforms.
Nahapetyan is hopeful that concrete moves will be taken in the future
to state progress in Armenia-NATO relations.
"There is no contradiction between cooperation with two blocs. We
will continue developing steps defined by the President of Armenia
as the main foreign policy directions," Nahapetyan added.
And the leaders of both Armenia and NATO also agree that there is
"no contradiction":
NATO Secretary General Anders Fogh Rasmussen spoke of "potential
for further development of our partnership" when he visited Yerevan
in September. He insisted that there is "no contradiction" between
Armenia's military alliance with Russia and closer ties with NATO.
President Serzh Sarkisian similarly said after talks with Rasmussen
that Yerevan will continue combining its membership of the Russian-led
Collective Security Treaty Organization (CSTO) with growing cooperation
with the U.S.-led alliance.
It's true that there is no contradiction, in the same way that the
U.S. can both be a member of NATO and hold joint military exercises
with Russia. It's just understood that Armenia's ties with Russia are
so strong that a few U.S./NATO cooperation programs here and there
aren't going to make any difference. As Armenia's NATO ambassador
put it, Armenia is no Georgia:
The essence of cooperation with NATO and Georgia and Armenia are
fundamentally different, in that neither in the short term nor the
long term is the question of NATO accession on our agenda.
If Armenia started to suggest that it wanted to join NATO, or leave
the CSTO or kick out the Russian base in Gyumri, then Moscow would
start to worry. But until that unlikely point, Russians won't be
jealous of any new suitors to Armenia.
http://www.eurasianet.org/node/66196
EurasiaNet.org
Nov 19 2012
NY
November 19, 2012 - 12:22am, by Joshua Kucera
Armenia has lately been boosting cooperation with both NATO and
Russia, prompting questions about how far it can play both sides of
the geopolitical conflict.
This fall, Armenia has hosted top NATO officials and the U.S.
secretary of the navy, and in September Armenian units trained by
the U.S. and NATO countries for deployment in international missions,
like that in Afghanistan, conducted an exercise, reported RFE/RL:
[S]ome 600 soldiers of the volunteer unit simulated their participation
in a multinational peacekeeping operation in an exercise watched
by U.S. military instructors. The exercise also involved what the
Armenian Defense Ministry described as a successful "self-appraisal
with NATO standards" by the brigade's Staff Company.
But this fall, Armenia also hosted exercises of the Russia-run
Collective Security Treaty Organization and has signed an agreement
with Russia on joint arms production, a provision of which requires
Armenia to "rely exclusively on Russian-made and supplied weapons,"
writes analyst Richard Giragosian in a piece at Oxford Analytica:
For the first time, Armenia is being excluded from procuring Western
arms, limiting its options and potential partners and, at least in
theory, hindering its pursuit of interoperability with NATO standards.
This has raised questions about Armenia's ability to manage this
balancing act, with Armenian and Western officials -- who are now
regularly asked about it -- saying there is no contradiction in its
ties with the West and Russia. Armenian Public Radio reports on U.S.
ambassador to Armenia John Heffern:
Ambassador Heffern said there is no competition between the United
States and Russia in the region. "We work very closely with each
other, especially on the Minsk Group process," he added.According
to John Hefffern, there is no competition between the collective
Security Treaty organization (CSTO) and NATO. "Armenia has a special
relationship with Russia and the CSTO and has an important partnership
with NATO, the Ambassador said, adding that he sees no conflict
between the two at all.
Armenia's ambassador to NATO says the same:
Armenia's CSTO membership is a part of country's military-political
strategy but it is not damaging the relationship with NATO.
"We believe such cooperation is advantageous to Armenia. The ongoing
reforms are carried out in separate directions with NATO's assistance,"
he said, pointing out defense and security reforms.
Nahapetyan is hopeful that concrete moves will be taken in the future
to state progress in Armenia-NATO relations.
"There is no contradiction between cooperation with two blocs. We
will continue developing steps defined by the President of Armenia
as the main foreign policy directions," Nahapetyan added.
And the leaders of both Armenia and NATO also agree that there is
"no contradiction":
NATO Secretary General Anders Fogh Rasmussen spoke of "potential
for further development of our partnership" when he visited Yerevan
in September. He insisted that there is "no contradiction" between
Armenia's military alliance with Russia and closer ties with NATO.
President Serzh Sarkisian similarly said after talks with Rasmussen
that Yerevan will continue combining its membership of the Russian-led
Collective Security Treaty Organization (CSTO) with growing cooperation
with the U.S.-led alliance.
It's true that there is no contradiction, in the same way that the
U.S. can both be a member of NATO and hold joint military exercises
with Russia. It's just understood that Armenia's ties with Russia are
so strong that a few U.S./NATO cooperation programs here and there
aren't going to make any difference. As Armenia's NATO ambassador
put it, Armenia is no Georgia:
The essence of cooperation with NATO and Georgia and Armenia are
fundamentally different, in that neither in the short term nor the
long term is the question of NATO accession on our agenda.
If Armenia started to suggest that it wanted to join NATO, or leave
the CSTO or kick out the Russian base in Gyumri, then Moscow would
start to worry. But until that unlikely point, Russians won't be
jealous of any new suitors to Armenia.
http://www.eurasianet.org/node/66196