POLITICIANS LOST TO OLIGARCHS
Siranuysh Papyan
http://www.lragir.am/index.php/eng/0/interview/view/28158
Interview - Monday, 26 November 2012, 12:06
Interview with Vardan Jaloyan, culture studies
Mr. Jaloyan, is oligarchy something new?
The oligarchy told people 'I will do what I want'. The political elite,
both government and opposition, said I will serve you.
The oligarchy is the rule of criminal money. This is a recent
phenomenon. Oligarchy refuses calm discussion, rational debate,
prefers hysteria, boasting, terrorism. The oligarchic government is
the first obstacle to our development, it is an important pillar of
our current government.
Simply go and see what crucial decisions they make for our country
while high, in a hysteric psychosis. The society must demand that
decisions should not be made when high. We all have the right to demand
this. I hope my message will get to them. I hope you will be helpful.
They are such brutes that I will not analyze what they say and do.
How about the force that cooperates with oligarchs which has defined
the system as oligarchic? What are your thoughts?
It is a complicated issue. In 2001 Robert Kocharyan understood that
it is better to deal with = influential people rather than politicians.
The politicians lost lo the oligarchs, and it was a big change. Now
the question - do we want the politicians or the oligarchs to solve
our problems? Levon Ter-Petrosyan says the oligarchs are better and
stated ready to deal with them. The electorate is very important,
influential people are important.
Now people who are more influential than oligarchs and the old
political nomenclature are needed. This will be the meaning of the
election of 2013.
It appears that Levon Ter-Petrosyan is using Kocharyan's mechanism,
preferring oligarchs to politicians.
He tried to invent a new mechanism of decision making but failed and
returned to Kocharyan's model. Yes, the attitude of both to political
figures is amazing.
Or maybe they do not prefer political figures because there are no
real politicians?
No, there are lots of politicians. The country is swarming with
politicians. There are no political issues. Take, for instance,
unemployment, poverty, inflation, youth issues. The politicians
hypocritically say that those are natural disasters and cannot be
resolved. If these problems are returned on the agenda, politics will
return as well. There will be real politicians. I personally think
those are solvable problems.
From: Emil Lazarian | Ararat NewsPress
Siranuysh Papyan
http://www.lragir.am/index.php/eng/0/interview/view/28158
Interview - Monday, 26 November 2012, 12:06
Interview with Vardan Jaloyan, culture studies
Mr. Jaloyan, is oligarchy something new?
The oligarchy told people 'I will do what I want'. The political elite,
both government and opposition, said I will serve you.
The oligarchy is the rule of criminal money. This is a recent
phenomenon. Oligarchy refuses calm discussion, rational debate,
prefers hysteria, boasting, terrorism. The oligarchic government is
the first obstacle to our development, it is an important pillar of
our current government.
Simply go and see what crucial decisions they make for our country
while high, in a hysteric psychosis. The society must demand that
decisions should not be made when high. We all have the right to demand
this. I hope my message will get to them. I hope you will be helpful.
They are such brutes that I will not analyze what they say and do.
How about the force that cooperates with oligarchs which has defined
the system as oligarchic? What are your thoughts?
It is a complicated issue. In 2001 Robert Kocharyan understood that
it is better to deal with = influential people rather than politicians.
The politicians lost lo the oligarchs, and it was a big change. Now
the question - do we want the politicians or the oligarchs to solve
our problems? Levon Ter-Petrosyan says the oligarchs are better and
stated ready to deal with them. The electorate is very important,
influential people are important.
Now people who are more influential than oligarchs and the old
political nomenclature are needed. This will be the meaning of the
election of 2013.
It appears that Levon Ter-Petrosyan is using Kocharyan's mechanism,
preferring oligarchs to politicians.
He tried to invent a new mechanism of decision making but failed and
returned to Kocharyan's model. Yes, the attitude of both to political
figures is amazing.
Or maybe they do not prefer political figures because there are no
real politicians?
No, there are lots of politicians. The country is swarming with
politicians. There are no political issues. Take, for instance,
unemployment, poverty, inflation, youth issues. The politicians
hypocritically say that those are natural disasters and cannot be
resolved. If these problems are returned on the agenda, politics will
return as well. There will be real politicians. I personally think
those are solvable problems.
From: Emil Lazarian | Ararat NewsPress