Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Baku: Their Show Must Go On?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Baku: Their Show Must Go On?

    THEIR SHOW MUST GO ON?
    By Elmar Chakhtakhtinski

    http://azerireport.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=3734&Ite mid=48
    October 10, 2012

    A Context for the Upcoming International Internet Governance Forum
    in Baku

    Azerbaijani dictator Ilham Aliyev (left) and Syrian dictator Bashar
    Assad (right) with their spouses

    Aliyev dynasty in Azerbaijan, similarly to Assad dynasty in Syria,
    can not and will not ever conduct any meaningful reforms. And not
    only because they have been failing to do so for a few long decades.

    Although that by itself should be enough to dismiss the big pile of
    "analytical reports" and articles prepared by the apologists of the
    corrupt dictatorships among domestic and foreign "experts" (with the
    latter simply being a bunch of thinly veiled lobbyists). After all,
    doing the same thing over and over - like pursuing the policy of
    "friendly engagement" with proven tyrants and thieves - and expecting
    different results (reforms?) is the clinical definition of insanity.

    Or, more likely, it is the sign of intellectual dishonesty on part
    of those who promote those "expectations".

    But in addition to this practical observation, there is a more
    fundamental reason why such regimes would never change. Opening up the
    society for real political or economic freedoms that might lead to
    the emergence of forces outside the regime's complete control means
    a practical suicide for them. That is because their entire modus
    operandi is based on such immoral and repressive mechanisms, and
    the ruling elites have committed so much theft and grave injustice -
    that there is no chance left for them to ever govern or even coexist
    with competing power centers within an open society.

    For these are not some traditional monarchies with long-established
    legitimacy, simply trying to modernize their institutions. Neither
    do they represent, anymore, a legacy of some failed ideological
    experiments like communism, theocracy or extreme nationalism,
    struggling to evolve into something better. No, these regimes have no
    distinct ideology and no true "great cause": everything they claim to
    stand for is a pure lie. "Nationalism", "modernism", "militarism",
    sporadic "religious tendencies" demonstrated by the leadership or,
    on the opposite side, their "staunch secularism" - whatever vision
    they find expedient to pretend to follow - it has nothing to do with
    their real aspirations. Their only goal is as simple and primordial
    as prolongation of their rule so that they and their descendants and
    clans can rob the rest of the population and trample their rights
    and freedoms perpetually, as long as the heavens and the earth exist.

    [Police%20and%20Heydar%20Aliyev.jpg] They claim to be a "Republic",
    but in reality they are nothing but dynastical neo-feudal formations
    with elements of organized crime syndicates. Even the term "state"
    is a stretch when applied to their operations, more resembling the
    ways of mafia than of a normal government. Their true power is based on
    deceit, fear, and pervasive corruption. Such concepts as "legitimacy",
    "will of people", "equality before law", "responsible governance",
    let alone "democracy" and "respect for human rights", are foreign to
    them. But they get increasingly better in imitating the institutions
    that are supposed to be based on those ideas. Why bother with all the
    trouble of building the real thing when you can simply lie about it?

    Thus, they hold fake elections and write fake laws to be applied
    by fake courts. They might even have such phony posts in their
    "governments" as "human rights commissioner" or "ombudsman".

    But what is written on paper has little bearing on how things work
    in real life. They join modern international conventions, alliances,
    leagues - but in domestic affairs they do not respect any of the
    agreed norms and proclaimed values of those organizations. Their
    signature on international treaties regarding the respect for human
    liberties and responsible governance means as little as their words
    and promises at home.

    [Morningstar%20bows%20to%20Heydar%20Aliyev.jpg] US Ambassador to
    Azerbaijan, Richard Morningstar, begins his tenure by bowing down
    to the statue of late Azerbaijani dictator Heydar Aliyev (father of
    current dictator Ilham Aliyev)

    The impostor-president inherits throne from his father and runs
    a pseudo-republic, where his children formally (albeit secretly,
    until discovered by some brave journalist) own the country's largest
    gold mines, phone companies, and banks. And informally, he and his
    gang of minister-oligarchs also control and plunder everything else
    from oil revenues to state budget to military expenditures, without a
    hint of accountability to anyone, let alone to the ordinary citizens
    (those poor "voters" that never get a chance have their votes cast
    and counted freely and fairly). Some of the ruling family members
    and their closest associates also become members of the fraudulent
    rubber-stump "parliament" with 90-95% of "votes" in their favor, and
    with the rest of parliamentary seats sold for million dollar bribes
    like lucrative trading booths in a medieval street bazaar.

    Meanwhile, everyone who dares to oppose them and presents a danger to
    their otherwise unchallenged power - gets beaten, jailed, tortured,
    deprived of income and property, blackmailed, exiled, and occasionally,
    when needed - killed. The scale and brutality of crackdown might vary
    between different regimes and at different times, depending on the
    intensity and scale of dissent being suppressed. And as they learned
    to simulate the positive attributes of normal, free countries, they
    also master the art of disavowing their own dishonorable behavior by
    either shamelessly denying it outright or employing an army of paid
    lobbyists and apologists who rationalize and justify their actions.

    [Azerbaijan_Free_Speech.jpg] In any civilized country with a minimal
    rule of law, people with the record of power abuse like Ilham Aliyev
    and Bashar Assad (even before the current war crimes and mass murder
    committed by the Syrian regime) would have been sent behind bars long
    time ago, along with most of their family members and cronies with
    whom they conspire and share the loot. They realize this and that
    is why they never dare to pursue real reforms. That is why they get
    ever more tyrannical and corrupt: they have to - this is the natural
    course of their rule. And when challenged - they either have to flee
    or choose to murder citizens en masse to save themselves.

    Then why in the world these crooked dictators would ever willingly,
    short of a direct pressure or explicit threat, change their ways and
    ruin the very thing that keeps them in charge? They have nothing to
    show for but this inflexible repressive system built around the cult of
    their family and a hungry army of their equally corrupt minions with
    whom they have to continue pillaging the country in order to sustain
    their grip on power and obscene life styles. That irreversible cycle
    and the baggage of the crimes and injustices they perpetrated does
    not leave them with any appetite or capacity for a change, ever.

    [Fsa.jpg] They know it, their people know it, the West knows it and
    everyone who cares to know - knows it very well. All of the facts
    mentioned above have been documented, exposed and spread in worldwide
    media coverage. But still, while they pretend to be something very
    different from what they really are, the rest of the world, not knowing
    how else to deal with them, pretends to believe in their crude theater,
    expresses hopes for illusive "reforms" and occasionally even praises
    them for phantom "progress".

    That seems to be working well for them and for the world ... until
    the s..t hits the fan and there comes a point when people can't stand
    it anymore, blood gets spilled and the great powers are caught in
    a desperate search for "urgent response", sanctions, no fly zones,
    and military interventions.

Working...
X