Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Armenia Is Problem For U.S.

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Armenia Is Problem For U.S.

    ARMENIA IS PROBLEM FOR U.S.
    Igor Muradyan

    Story from Lragir.am News:
    http://www.lragir.am/engsrc/comments27771.html
    Published: 18:15:02 - 18/10/2012

    It seems that Armenia is geopolitically the most vulnerable and
    dependent state of the South Caucasus but the world poles find it
    difficult and uncomfortable to set up relations with it. It seems that
    Russia has built relations with Armenia without much effort but it
    turned out to destroy rather than build up relations with our country.

    In the result of Russia's successful policy in the South Caucasus and
    chronically ignored interests of Armenia the supporters of cooperation
    with Russia are hopelessly outbid politicians and experts.

    How did the Armenians fall in love with America? This is a sacramental
    question indeed and it is often silenced as well as the issue of
    developing relations with NATO. The love-hate game means efforts of
    the Armenian society to enter into political relations with the world.

    >From time to time the United States opens a virtual book of complaints
    and asks the Caucasian politicians to leave their signatures there.

    The Americans hinted possible construction of a new nuclear reactor
    or a scenario of development of nuclear energy in Armenia. This is
    highly hypothetical but the Americans would not have started the
    discussion of this issue without studying the problem first.

    Throughout many years the American experts and politicians have been
    studying reviews and political notes stating the idea that Armenia
    will be influenced by the country which will build a nuclear power
    plant there. It was clear from the beginning that Russia does not
    treat this project seriously in any possible form.

    The possible interest of Russia in building the second nuclear plant
    in Armenia was thoroughly discussed in Moscow not only with experts
    but also administrators and managers of those state and semi-private
    structures of Russia which were directly related to nuclear projects.

    One should mention the Russian responsible functionaries who defined
    thoroughly the factors and circumstances regarding talks in favor of
    poor Armenians.

    At the same time, together with specific, economic and technical
    problems which have been studied for many years it would be interesting
    to clarify foreign political and geopolitical aspects. My colleague
    and friend who deals with global economic problems has expressed doubt
    that there are factors of global political and economic interest of
    Russia in the implementation of this project. The second nuclear
    station in Armenia would mean greater dependence on Russia and a
    wider span of foreign political maneuver.

    The United States and NATO have understood that Georgia has exhausted
    its strategic reserve and has done everything it can. Azerbaijan
    is a temporary state which is not able to fulfill the functions
    of partnership. Despite disadvantages of its situation, Armenia has
    abilities and interests which our regional neighbors do not and cannot
    have. The United States and NATO are interested in Armenia for several
    reasons about which we have already written on Lragir.am. We would like
    to underline that Armenia juxtaposes the goals of restricting Turkey
    and strategic partnership with Russia, including within CSTO, and is in
    close relations with Iran, which interests the Euro-Atlantic community.

    Even the Russian military base in Armenia is viewed as a factor of
    advantage in the NATO-Armenia cooperation. At the same time, Armenia
    cannot fulfill and develop these functions in these circumstances
    and solve the problems of development of energy and transport
    independently. Besides, more or less foreseeable development of
    relations with Armenia may be foiled by the membership of Armenia to
    the so-called Eurasian Union.

    The United States and France cannot allow this, which requires a quick
    reaction. The United States has missed a lot during its "tactical
    idleness" in the region. Armenia is the case when it is necessary to
    take the initiative, especially that the Americans already have the
    sad experience of democratic show in Georgia.

    The United States and NATO need strong factors of control over
    Turkey's regional policy, as well as over Azerbaijan with its idiotic
    ambitions. Partners are needed but who are they? NATO Chicago summit
    has put forth new strategies but NATO has to put forth plans in a
    reserved and delicate manner. The South Caucasus will have to act fast,
    time is not waiting. In addition, the Russian experts are trying to
    present activation of Americans in the South Caucasus as a reaction
    to the problem of Iran, as an effort to frighten Russia's southern
    partners with the war in Iran. Everything is a little different.

Working...
X