Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

As If The Ottoman Period Never Ended

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • As If The Ottoman Period Never Ended

    AS IF THE OTTOMAN PERIOD NEVER ENDED

    http://www.aina.org/news/20121029202329.htm
    Posted GMT 10-30-2012 1:23:29

    ISTANBUL -- Since the lavish, feel-good Turkish epic "Conquest 1453"
    had its premiere this year, its tale of the taking of Constantinople
    by the 21-year-old Sultan Mehmet II has become the highest-grossing
    film in Turkey's history, released in 12 countries across the Middle
    East and in Germany and the United States. But its biggest impact
    may be the cultural triumphalism it has magnified at home.

    "Conquest 1453" (known as "Fetih 1453" in Turkish) has spawned a
    television show with the same title and has encouraged clubs of
    proud Turks to re-enact battles from the empire's glory days and
    even dress up as sultans and Ottoman nobles. The producers of "Once
    Upon a Time Ottoman Empire Mutiny," a television series about the
    18th-century insurrection against Sultan Ahmet Khan III, said they
    planned to build a theme park where visitors will be able to wander
    through a reproduction of Ottoman-era Istanbul and watch sword fights
    by stuntmen. At least four new films portray the battle of Gallipoli,
    the bloody World War I face-off between the Ottomans and Allied forces
    over the straits of Dardanelles and one of the greatest victories
    of modern Turkey. The coming "In Gallipoli" even includes Mel Gibson
    starring as a British commander.

    The Ottoman period, particularly during the 16th and 17th centuries,
    was marked by geopolitical dominance and cultural prowess, during
    which the sultans claimed the spiritual leadership of the Muslim world,
    before the empire's slow decline culminated in World War I. For years
    the period was underplayed in the history taught to schoolchildren,
    as the new Turkish Republic created by Mustafa Kemal Ataturk in 1923
    sought to break with a decadent past.

    Now, as Turkey is emerging as a leader in the Middle East, buoyed
    by strong economic growth, a new fascination with history is being
    reflected in everything from foreign policy to facial hair. In the
    arts, framed examples of Ottoman-era designs, known as Ebru and
    associated with the geometric Islamic motifs adorning mosques, have
    gained in popularity among the country's growing Islamic bourgeoisie,
    adorning walls of homes and offices, jewelry and even business cards.

    The three-year-old Panorama Museum, which showcases an imposing
    360-degree, 45-foot-tall painting of the siege of Constantinople,
    complete with deafening cannon fire blasts and museum security guards
    dressed as Janissary soldiers, is drawing huge crowds.

    And in the past few years there has been a proliferation of
    Ottoman-themed soap operas, none more popular than "The Magnificent
    Century," a sort of "Sex in the City" set during the 46-year reign of
    Sultan Suleiman the Magnificent. The Turkish show pulpishly chronicles
    the intrigues of the imperial household and harem, including the
    rise of Suleiman's slave girl-turned-queen, Hurrem. Last year it was
    broadcast in 32 countries, including Morocco and Kosovo.

    The empire's rehabilitation has inspired mixed feelings among cultural
    critics. "The Ottoman revival is good for the national ego and has
    captured the psyche of the country at this moment, when Turkey wants
    to be a great power," said Melis Behlil, a film studies professor at
    Kadir Has University here. But, she warned: "It terrifies me because
    too much national ego is not a good thing. Films like 'Conquest 1453'
    are engaging in cultural revisionism and glorifying the past without
    looking at history in a critical way."

    Faruk Aksoy, the 48-year-old director of "Conquest 1453," said that
    he had dreamed of making a film about the conquering of Istanbul ever
    since he arrived there at the age of 10 from Urfa, in Turkey's rugged
    southeast, and had been mesmerized by Istanbul's imperial grandeur.

    But he had to wait 10 years to make a big-budget film because the
    financing and technology were not available.

    The film's budget of $18.2 million was a record in Turkey, but it has
    more than recouped that, grossing $40 million in Turkey and Europe,
    Mr. Aksoy said. So stirred was a crowd at a recent screening that it
    roared "God is Great!" as the sword-wielding Ottomans scaled Istanbul's
    forbidden walls. Mr. Aksoy recalled that one cinema manager debated
    calling the police, fearing a real fight.

    "We Turks are hot-blooded people," he said. "The Turks are proud
    about the conquest because it not only changed our history but it
    also changed the world."

    But others warn of a dangerous cultural jingoism at work. Burak
    Bekdil, a columnist for Hurriyet Daily News, mused in a recent
    column that the time was ripe for a film called "Conquest 1974,"
    to celebrate the Turkish invasion of Cyprus, or "Extinction 1915,"
    to commemorate the genocide of 1.5 million Armenians during World
    War I. Death threats followed.

    Critics have also faulted the film for inaccuracies and hyperbole,
    though Mr. Aksoy stressed that he had employed Ottoman scholars.

    Members of the court of the last Byzantine emperor, Constantine XI --
    portrayed as hedonistic boozers surrounded by nubile dancing girls
    -- talk in Turkish rather than Greek or Latin. Even Mehmet II, the
    conquering Sultan famed for his prodigious nose, has been retooled
    as a heroic pretty boy.

    Alper Turgut, a leading film critic, deplored this one-dimensional
    universe even as he lauded the film's epic ambitions. "If they had
    exaggerated just a bit more, it would be an absurdist comedy," he
    said in an interview.

    Mr. Aksoy expressed annoyance that a film meant to entertain was
    being politicized. "Would you ask Ridley Scott if he was politically
    influenced?" he asked.

    Cultural critics noted that the film's religious underpinning --
    there's even a cameo by the Prophet Muhammad predicting that
    Constantinople will be conquered by believers -- had made it
    popular with the growing Islamic bourgeoisie in a country that has
    increasingly turned its back on the crisis-ridden Europe and instead
    looks increasingly eastward. (The movie has also been embraced by some
    members of the governing Islamic party as an alternative to Hollywood's
    "crusader mentality.")

    Religious conservatives had been marginalized during the secular
    cultural revolution undertaken by Ataturk. "For the first time we
    are seeing this new Islamic bourgeoisie, its tastes and its mores,
    reflected on the small and big screens," Mr. Turgut said.

    Ms. Behlil noted that the advent of big-budget television shows
    and films depicting the Ottoman era owed something to the country's
    popularity in the Arab world, which was bringing in new revenues for
    production companies. Last year Turkey was Europe's largest exporter
    of soap operas, pocketing $70 million in revenues.

    But it is at home that the series and films are having a profound
    impact, educating a new generation of Turks.

    Burak Temir, 24, a German-Turkish actor who played a prince on
    "Once Upon a Time Ottoman Empire Mutiny," said he had initially been
    intimidated about portraying an era he knew so little about.

    To prepare for his part, the show gave him a four-month crash course in
    Ottoman manners that included learning how to ride horses, sword fight,
    use a bow and arrow and puff out his chest. Even when not filming
    the show, he sports a Sultan-like beard and skinny Ottoman-style
    pants. "It makes me proud to be Turkish," he said.

    By Dan Bilefsky New York Times

Working...
X