Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Opinion: "Safarov Affair" Should Be A Warning Beyond Armenia

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Opinion: "Safarov Affair" Should Be A Warning Beyond Armenia

    OPINION: "SAFAROV AFFAIR" SHOULD BE A WARNING BEYOND ARMENIA
    By John Hughes

    ArmeniaNow
    05.09.12 | 16:02

    Armenians too often try to find, in any world atrocity, a link to
    the Armenian Genocide.

    On the Ramil Safarov matter, however, one needn't look far for
    a parallel.

    When Muslim Turks were slaughtering Christian Armenians, religious
    leaders of the aggressors promised that if a Turk would kill the
    "infidel" Armenians, he would be rewarded in the afterlife.

    That was early last century. Late last week, President Ilham Aliyev of
    Azerbaijan took the pledge a leap forward. For his near-decapitation
    murder of a sleeping Armenian officer in a Hungary dormitory, Aliyev
    made sure Safarov needn't delay receiving his ticket to the good life
    by waiting for the afterlife.

    As unacceptable as the release of the axe-murderer is, he is surely
    not the first executor of a heinous crime whose sentence was cut
    shorter than it should have been.

    And this very fact itself might have tempered the pardoning of Safarov,
    had Aliyev let it go at that.

    Maybe - although this is a stretch - our outrage would be a bit less
    bile-inducing, had Aliyev quietly issued the pardon, with a statement
    that - international agreements not withstanding - the Azerbaijan
    Ministry of Justice has concluded that the convict has paid for his
    crime, has shown remorse (which would be a lie), and that on those
    grounds he has been set free.

    Something at least digestible, even if far from acceptable.

    Extremely far from acceptable - and exemplary of the difference between
    Christian Armenian mentality and Muslim Azeri mentality - was Aliyev's
    insult to injury, salt in the wound, or whatever cliché that cannot
    adequately express the president's apparent profound disregard for
    humane behavior in this case.

    The president went to the Baku airport to meet Safarov; promoted
    the lieutenant to major; paid him 8.5 years of back salary for time
    spent in a Hungarian jail; gave him an apartment. And he turned
    him into a national hero for acts that civilized minds would abhor
    regardless of circumstance - to say nothing of the fact that Safarov's
    "defense of motherland" was not carried out on a battlefield, but at a
    "Partnership for Peace" seminar.

    Look at the photo at the top of this page. Imagine how you would
    feel were you the family of the slain Gurgen Margaryan. We would be
    pleased to answer that question for you, however, ArmeniaNow has been
    told that the Margaryan family has unplugged their phone, locked their
    door, and doesn't want to speak to anyone. Different picture, that.

    Can you imagine President Barack Obama, President Francois Hollande,
    Chancellor Angela Merkel, Prime Minister David Cameron, or many other
    Western-world leaders going to their respective airports to publicly
    receive and HONOR a convicted killer - even one whose barbarism was
    motivated by patriotism?

    Who knows how Armenia might react if the situation were reversed.

    Varoujan Garabedian, a member of the Armenian Secret Army for the
    Liberation of Armenia (ASALA) served 17 years in a French prison
    for his part in a Paris bombing that killed 8. He was deported to
    Armenia in 2001. The mayor of Yerevan promised to find him a job. The
    Prime Minister met with Garabedian and said he was glad that he had
    been released.

    Garabedian himself said years later that "a freedom fighter must
    never appear on the political arena".

    On a more global perspective: Does any Christian nation want to
    see a people of like faith live under a regime in which convicted
    murderers are hailed as heroes - not just by nationalists fanatics,
    but by the very leaders of their country?

    This question should be added to the debate that is now stirred
    by Azerbaijan's pardon, promotion, rewarding and regaling of an
    axe-murderer.

    Shouldn't this "Sarafov Affair" as the New York Times called it,
    weigh on any bone fide democratic country's conscience in whether
    Nagorno Karabakh Republic should be internationally recognized?

    Here's a thought: If the people of Karabakh had found themselves
    subjected to the rule of Iran's Mahmoud Aհmadinejad, to the Iraqi
    rule of Saddam Hussein, to the Taliban ruled Afghanistan or to the
    latest of the worst, Syria's Bashar-al Assad, would the United States
    and others not support the Karabakhis' right to self determination
    by endorsing their legitimacy?

    Former Armenian president Robert Kocharyan said yesterday that Hungary
    ought to recognize NKR, in response to being lied to by Azerbaijan
    and Aliyev (who had told Hungarian officials that Safarov would not
    be set free for at least another 17 years).

    Other countries should do so for reasons that are not rooted in
    retaliation, but in preservation of a tiny but strategic collection
    of people whose better beliefs (for those believing Christian-based
    democracy is "better") would be death sentences in an Azeri-controlled
    Karabakh.

    This "affair" should be a lesson to those nations whose political,
    social, religious sympathies lie with the Armenians. Otherwise the
    queue will form with Turks looking to fast track eternity's promise
    for today's reward.



    From: Emil Lazarian | Ararat NewsPress
Working...
X