Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Let's Not Become A "Besieged Fortress"

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Let's Not Become A "Besieged Fortress"

    LET'S NOT BECOME A "BESIEGED FORTRESS"
    by Ara Tadevosyan

    Mediamax
    Sept 4 2012
    Armenia

    Director of Mediamax

    Over the last days our diplomats have been working to make so that the
    European Union issued a favorable statement on Ramil Safarov's case.

    The statement was made yesterday but it was like a cold shower
    for many.

    Although the European Union expressed concern by the decision of the
    Azerbaijani President but, actually, did not condemn it. Moreover,
    the EU has in fact "covered" Hungary's decision to transfer Safarov
    to Azerbaijan. It was also quite cynical that the EU had included
    traditional words about "reconciliation" into the statement about
    granting pardon to a killer.

    The work of our Foreign Ministry is another topic. It's obvious that if
    the ministry had worked better the EU wouldn't make such a statement:
    If they hadn't prevented Safarov's extradition to Azerbaijan, at
    least they could get ready for it having informed the world about
    the possible deal beforehand. I think, at the press conference with
    his Argentinean counterpart, Foreign Minister Nalbandyan must come
    up with an assessment about the activity of the Ministry.

    After yesterday's statement by the European Union, a lot of
    opinions were voiced like: "Europe has finally discredited itself",
    "No rapprochement with such Europe", etc. Let the advocates of such
    approaches pardon me, but they are either hopeless romantics or they
    simply understand nothing in international relations and politics.

    Politics is based only on interests. It's a waste of time trying to
    fight it or making soulful statements.

    This way or another, the EU should have naturally defended its member
    state - Hungary. When on August 31 the President of Armenia spoke
    about the suspension of relations with Hungary, many people did not
    understand what had happened indeed. This is what happened: for the
    first time in its history, Armenia has made a demarche against EU
    and NATO member state. Let's put aside the motives and the propriety
    of the demarche and let's consider only the fact. In this case it's
    not that significant that Hungary is a "new" or "second-grade" member
    of the EU and NATO and its Prime Minister Victor Orban has been long
    annoying the EU leadership. It is significant that such super-powerful
    "clubs" do not betray their members so easily. The brightest example
    is Greece. Whole Europe understands that it's almost impossible to
    save the Greek economy from collapse but they keep on taking efforts.

    Armenia is a member of the Collective Security Treaty Organization
    (CSTO). Can you remember any cases when Yerevan criticized Belarus
    or Tajikistan? There haven't been such cases. Every union is based
    on a dominant interest (in our case it is the provision of physical
    security) which governs all other interests. Of course, there are
    tremendous differences in the system of values of EU, NATO and CSTO,
    but there is one principle common to all of them - the member state
    is always allowed more then a partner.

    When the President announced about the suspension of relations with
    Hungary, a few remembered that Armenia conducts negotiations with EU on
    Association Agreement and Armenia is close to signing the Visa Regime
    Facilitation Agreement. The following scenario is also quite possible:
    Hungary, a member of the European Union, may hamper the negotiations
    just like Cyprus does in case of Turkey. The latter swells with rage
    but can't do anything: Cyprus is a member of the European Union.

    The suspension of relations with Hungary was, most likely, the only
    possible option. In fact, the Foreign Ministry has left no other choice
    to the Armenian President. However, today they have to build a policy
    of balanced steps and resist the temptation to acquire the psychology
    of "besieged fortress". All the besieged fortresses eventually fall,
    or their defenders become so exhausted that the end of the siege
    slightly differs from defeat.

    Not disregarding our own interests we have to continue relations
    with the European Union and NATO, denying slogans like "we don't need
    them, we can do without them". We have to remember that it's we who
    want rapprochement with Brussels, not vice versa. We ask the EU to
    organize a Donors Conference or provide funds for the modernization
    of our border check points, etc.

    Yes, we do have serious problems, but they are not unsolvable. We
    simply need new, devoted and freely thinking people who can build
    this policy of sober steps, not only in foreign but also in domestic
    politics. The latter is the root of all our foreign political
    complications.

Working...
X