Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

President Of Armenia: The So Called "Diplomatic Correctness" In This

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • President Of Armenia: The So Called "Diplomatic Correctness" In This

    PRESIDENT OF ARMENIA: THE SO CALLED "DIPLOMATIC CORRECTNESS" IN THIS CASE IS SIMPLY DETRIMENTAL FOR THE SECURITY OF THIS REGION

    arminfo
    Friday, September 7, 19:53

    I am glad to welcome you to the Presidential Palace, welcome you
    to Armenia. OSCE is a very important organization for Armenia
    not only because this Organization has in its framework several
    institutions - the Minsk Group, the High-level Planning Group,
    the OSCE Chairman-in-Office Personal Representative - all of them
    dealing with the Nagorno Karabakh problem, but also because the
    OSCE principles and the comprehensive concept of security is fully
    shared by our country. It is very important that in the framework
    of this Organization, we agreed that security of one country cannot
    be ensured at the expense of security of another country. We fully
    implement our commitments.

    However, recently an event has taken place, which makes us to seriously
    reconsider some of our approaches. As you know, in Azerbaijan pardon
    was immediately granted to a creature which committed a horrendous
    crime; unfortunately, in our view this event was not the last
    one. Everything started when in 2007 the OSCE Minsk Group presented
    its proposal for the settlement of the Nagorno Karabakh conflict. Many
    would remember how Azerbaijan rejected the document; then it made a
    declarative statement that the document in general was acceptable,
    but afterwards it was trying to give its own interpretations to the
    principles enshrined in the document. You remember how they were
    trying to interpret the right of self-determination. You remember
    how they were trying to interpret the term "referendum." And then
    a spectacle started which was meant to gain time, to accumulate huge
    amount of weaponry so that at the opportune moment the Nagorno Karabakh
    conflict could be solved through the military means.

    In our view, pardoning a murderer was not a step to raise Aliev's
    authority at home - it was an attempt to test the response of the
    international community to Azerbaijan's outrageous moves. Cannot be any
    other way because in Azerbaijan and among its leadership, there are,
    I believe, many people who could soberly see the consequences of such
    a move. And that testing of the international community's patience,
    as I said, has started long ago: when Azeris started to violate the
    CFT treaty obligations, nobody responded to those blatant violations;
    when Azeri president publicly instructed his Academia to write a
    history for Azerbaijan where Armenians must not be mentioned at all,
    nobody paid attention; when Aliev stated publicly that Yerevan and
    the entire territory of Armenia is the Azeri soil, nobody reacted to
    that; when Aliev declared publicly that their number one enemy is the
    Armenian nation world-wide and that the enemy must be destroyed, again
    there was no retort. In response to all our warnings, all requests
    we have made to the Co-chairs, to the rest of the world that it was
    a beginning of a very dangerous process we were receiving improper
    responses that Aliev's statements were for domestic consumption. Such
    a differentiation between the domestic and external audiences simply
    cannot be - a person cannot think one way in the morning, and another
    in the evening; one way on Monday, and another way on Thursday. Seeing
    such a lenience toward these statements, Aliev took up actions. The
    first one took place during the regional visit of the US Secretary
    of State: subversive actions were instigated not only on the line of
    contact but also at the Armenian-Azerbaijani border.

    And again the response was a weak one. And unfortunately, this is
    not the end of it.

    You know, I went through the war, that's why I don't want a new
    war. I personally felt on my own skin what the effects of the war, its
    impact. And I am confident that anyone concerned with security in our
    region, doesn't want a war. However, desiring is not enough - actions
    are needed and that actions must start when you call spade a spade.

    The so called "diplomatic correctness" in this case is simply
    detrimental for the security of this region.

    Recently, in Armenia a sarcastic joke appeared. It sounds like this:
    after these events, the international X organization calls upon Armenia
    and Azerbaijan not to axe each other in sleep. And this is not a
    joke to cheer you up, this is our people's attitude towards those
    international organizations which are trying to introduce parity
    between the victim and the perpetrator; between the guilty and the
    innocent. It is extremely bad. I ask you, I urge your governments
    and our Organization to deal with this issue.




    From: A. Papazian
Working...
X