Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

ANKARA: Azerbaijani Pro-Government And Opposition Parties Condemn Eu

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • ANKARA: Azerbaijani Pro-Government And Opposition Parties Condemn Eu

    AZERBAIJANI PRO-GOVERNMENT AND OPPOSITION PARTIES CONDEMN EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT'S RESOLUTION

    Journal of Turkish Weekly
    Sept 18 2012

    Azerbaijani pro-government and opposition parties have expressed
    categorical and unequivocal protest against the European Parliament's
    resolution on the so-called issue of Ramil Safarov. They consider
    that the issues reflected in this document are not objective. They
    testify to double standards, a joint statement of Azerbaijani parties
    to the European Parliament said today.

    'As the political parties operating in Azerbaijan, we clearly express
    our commitment to European values, the development of bilateral
    relations between Azerbaijan and the European organisations', the
    statement said.

    'After Azerbaijan gained independence, integration into the
    Euro-Atlantic area occupied an important place in the foreign policy
    of the country. Today Azerbaijan has been adequately represented in
    the UN, OSCE, Council of Europe and a number of other influential
    organisations. It joined the conventions and other legal documents
    adopted by these organisations'.

    According to the document, while taking an active part in the European
    Neighbourhood Policy and the Eastern Partnership, Azerbaijan commits
    itself to a collective agreement between the European Union and the
    countries of the South Caucasus.

    'The European Parliament adopted resolutions and made different
    decisions on Azerbaijan and the South Caucasus many times', the
    document said. 'The objective thoughts on the main problem faced by
    Azerbaijan - Armenia's aggression and the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict
    were reflected in the documents.

    'However, in some cases, deputies' groups represented in the European
    Parliament adopted the documents for the sake of particular interests
    and under the influence of the Armenian lobby. These documents do
    not reflect reality. These documents are uniquely perceived by public
    opinion and the political forces in Azerbaijan'.

    'The resolution adopted by the European Parliament in connection with
    Azerbaijani army officer Ramil Safarov's extradition to Azerbaijan
    and his pardon by the President, is biased and serves the interests
    of Armenia and the Armenian lobby', the Azerbaijani political parties
    said. 'International conventions and other legal documents regulate
    the extradition of prisoners and pardon. The European countries joined
    these conventions and they are accepted by all at the international
    level'.

    It was stressed that the extradition and pardon of Azerbaijani army
    officer Ramil Safarov has been implemented on the basis of Article 12
    of the 'Convention on the movement of prisoners', the Constitution
    of the Azerbaijani Republic as well as international legal norms
    and principles.

    'Unfortunately, some sections of the European bodies distributed
    the statements and documents that are far from objectivity', the
    statement said. 'It should be recalled that Ramil Safarov was born in
    the Azerbaijani Jabrail region occupied by Armenian armed forces. Most
    of his friends and relatives were killed during the military aggression
    of Armenia against Azerbaijan.

    'His family members became refugees. While taking part in the NATO
    English courses in Budapest in 2004, he was subjected to abuse by
    Armenian officer Gurgen Markarian, who also attended these courses. In
    response to this, being in the temporary insanity, he took extreme
    measures against him'.

    It was stressed that during the trial over Ramil Safarov in Budapest,
    a very tough verdict was given toward the Azerbaijani officer as a
    result of pressure from Armenia and the Armenian lobby. This verdict
    does not meet the principles of humanity. Such severity is not observed
    in European countries' courts. As a final example, one can cite the
    trial over Breivik in Norway and his sentence, but Safarov spent nine
    years in prison in accordance with his verdict.

    'Sensation raised over Ramil Safarov's issue by the Armenian lobby
    organisations and communities, patronising Armenia is an attempt to
    hide the war crimes committed by the Armenian aggressors as a result
    of the occupation of 20 per cent of Azerbaijani territory, turning
    one million people into refugees and the fact of the occupation and
    unconstructive position taken in the peace stalled talks.

    'The fact that none of the European organisations condemned the country
    which allowed the murderers to arrive in Armenia and provided them with
    citizenship and repeatedly made bloody terror attacks in various world
    countries in modern history (members of the terrorist organisations
    such as ASALA: Monte Melkonian, Vazgen Sislyan, Varujan Karapetyan
    and others), causes rage and resentment of the Azerbaijani public',
    the statement said.

    It was stressed that after the extradition of these terrorists to
    Armenia, they have committed a number of serious war crimes against
    the civilian population in the occupied Nagorno-Karabakh region of
    Azerbaijan, including the Khojaly genocide within the armed forces
    of this country.

    "We think that it would be better if such influential international
    organisations such as the European Parliament take consistent
    steps towards a peaceful settlement of the conflict between the two
    countries, rather than making decisions indulging Armenian aggression,"
    the parties said.

    "As the parties, signing the appeal, regardless of political
    orientation and stressing the concern of the Azerbaijani society in
    this issue, once again we express our a categorical and unequivocal
    protest against the resolution of the European Parliament. We think
    that the issues reflected in this document are biased and testify to
    double standards."

    Tuesday, 18 September 2012

    Trend AZ



    From: Emil Lazarian | Ararat NewsPress
Working...
X