Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Will Turks, Armenians ever reconcile?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Will Turks, Armenians ever reconcile?

    Al-Monitor
    dec 15 2013


    Will Turks, Armenians ever reconcile?

    Author: Mustafa AkyolPosted December 15, 2013

    When Turkish Foreign Minister Ahmet Davutoglu visited Yerevan on Dec.
    12, in the first high-level visit from Turkey to Armenia in five
    years, he was greeted not only by his Armenian counterpart, Eduard
    Nalbandyan, but also by political activists. The latter's welcome,
    however, was not a warm one. A group of protesters gathered in front
    of Davutoglu's hotel to protest Turkey's `denial of the Armenian
    genocide.' They wanted `recognition, condemnation and reparations,'
    and opposed the Turkish foreign minister for not taking those steps.



    Perhaps this was a bit unfair to Davutoglu, though, who said on this
    trip something that no other Turkish statesman has openly said before:
    that the `deportation' of Armenians from Anatolia in 1915 was
    `inhumane.' (In Turkey, `deportation' is the official and the common
    term for what others call `Armenian genocide.') No wonder Turkey's
    nationalists criticized Davutoglu for taking such an `unpatriotic'
    step. Writing in Yeni ÇaÄ?, a hardcore nationalist daily, columnist
    Ahmet Atakan argued that Davutoglu acted `as if he is not as the
    Turkish foreign minister, but a negotiator between the two sides
    [Turks and Armenians].' More important, the deputy chair of the main
    opposition CHP (People's Republican Party), Faruk Logoglu, criticized
    Davutoglu on Twitter and wrote (with my translation from Turkish):

    `FM Davutoglu said to the Armenian FM, `The deportation of 1915 was
    inhumane.' What was inhumane? What would he rather have been done?'

    Logoglu's reaction is significant because it represents the mainstream
    view in Turkey about the tragic fate of Ottoman Armenians. Most people
    here simply believe that it was a defensible act to protect the
    Turkish homeland.

    Here is why. A considerable portion of the people who call themselves
    Turks today are in fact rooted not in modern-day Turkey, but in two
    neighboring regions: the Balkans and the Caucasus. During the
    century-long shrinking of the Ottoman Empire, millions of Muslims in
    these two regions faced persecution and had to flee to Turkey proper.
    My own great-grandfather, for example, was a Circassian (Çerkes) who
    first resisted the Russian occupation of the Northwest Caucasus around
    the 1860s and then had to migrate to Yozgat, Anatolia, during the
    ethnic cleansing of Circassians. It is estimated that, during that
    long process of Russian onslaught in the Caucasus, some 1.5 million
    Circassian men, women and children were killed, and more than 1
    million others were expelled to Turkey. Hence comes the saying, "If
    you scratch a Turk, you find a Circassian persecuted by Russians
    underneath.'

    A similar story took place in the Balkans as well. As the Ottoman
    Empire shrank and new nation-states emerged in former Ottoman
    territories ' such as Serbia, Greece or Bulgaria ' Turks and other
    Muslims in these countries faced various waves of persecution and mass
    murder, resulting in millions of refugees. That is why there are
    millions of Balkan immigrants in modern-day Turkey ' people whose
    origin is Bosniak, Albanian, Pomak or Balkan Turk. In his book, Death
    and Exile: The Ethnic Cleansing of Ottoman Muslims, 1821-1922,
    American historian Justin McCarthy calculates that some 5 million
    Ottoman Muslims perished in a century due to ethnic cleansing by their
    enemies, most of whom were either Russians or the Eastern Orthodox
    allies of the Russians.

    This is the background that most Turks have in mind when they think of
    what happened to Ottoman Armenians. Of course, Armenians, who lived in
    Anatolia side by side with Turks for centuries, were not responsible
    for the tragic fate of the Muslims in the Balkans or the Caucasus. But
    in the early 20th century, Armenian nationalists in alliance with
    imperialist Russia aimed at carving out an independent Armenia from
    the collapsing Ottoman Empire. Had they succeeded, they could have
    initiated an ethnic cleansing against the Muslims similar to what
    happened in the Balkans and the Caucasus. This was the logic of the
    Ottoman Young Turk wartime government which, in the spring of 1915,
    made the tragic decision to deport all Armenians from Anatolia to
    Syria in response to the Armenian Uprising that began earlier that
    year. In was, in the minds of the Young Turks, a pre-emptive ethnic
    cleansing.

    To be sure, none of this justifies the death of even one of the
    approximately 1 million Armenians who perished in that fateful year of
    1915. This was, as Davutoglu put it, an `inhumane' act. And it remains
    a stain on Turkish history that I, as a fellow Turk, believe that we
    Turks should apologize for. However, it did not take place in a
    vacuum. Nor it did come out of a hateful ideology like that of the
    Nazis against the Jews. It rather came out of a horrible historical
    context which pitted the peoples of a crumbling empire against each
    other and in which Turks suffered at least as much pain as they
    caused.

    Therefore, reconciliation between Turks and Armenians will be possible
    only when this painful episode in history is understood in a way which
    takes the perspectives of both sides into account. Armenians, most
    naturally, recall only the suffering of their grandfathers and demand
    respect for it. Turks, on the other hand, recall the sufferings of
    their own grandfathers and question why the ethnic cleansing of the
    Armenians is singled out among many other tragedies in which they were
    the victims. Both sides need to understand the perspectives, and the
    feelings, of the other side. Both sides, in other words, need to know
    each other.

    Read More: http://www.al-monitor.com/pulse/originals/2013/12/turks-armenians-reconciliation-davutoglu-yerevan-visit.html

    Mustafa Akyol
    Columnist

    Mustafa Akyol is a columnist for Al-Monitor's Turkey Pulse and a
    columnist for Turkish Hurriyet Daily News and Star. His articles have
    also appeared in Foreign Affairs, Newsweek, The New York Times, The
    Washington Post, The Wall Street Journal and The Guardian. He is the
    author of Islam Without Extremes: A Muslim Case for Liberty.

    http://www.al-monitor.com/pulse/originals/2013/12/turks-armenians-reconciliation-davutoglu-yerevan-visit.html#

Working...
X