Tweet
FINAL DECISION HAS BEEN MADE
Second Round of Blockade
No matter how good the quality of political analysis is, realistic
information is irreplaceable and is always valuable. One way or
another, our friends of Europe answer complicated and delicate
questions the answers to which are usually more multifold than to the
problems that are in the focus of global events. One has to admit that
"September 3" is so strange that it would be wrong to ignore such a
category as "insult". It is hard not to take into account these moods
that are not easy to veil but apparently will have to be veiled in the
framework of a more or less general review of the factor of "insult"
to Armenia as an essential factor.
However, "insult" in this case looks quite politicized, which means
that Serzh Sargsyan and his team are no longer partners of Europe
and the United States, and the Armenian president merely ensures
appearance of wellbeing in foreign policy. The Europeans have already
managed to react to this act of the Armenian president through the
decision of the European court on the denial of the genocide which
was a shock for the Armenian community in Europe.
Funding of reform programs affirmed earlier cannot indicate anything
regarding the policy of the European Union. These are trifles. There
are more significant circumstances. At least, two divisions of the
EU's external service have conveyed to the European Commission their
visions on Armenia. It is believed that there can be no proposals
on behalf of Armenia because the Armenian government is not capable
of any behavior that requires minimum sovereignty. On the eve of
"September 3" the EU officials got in touch with the representatives
of Armenia and they relayed to their leadership reassuring messages
so their professional situation is now quite complicated.
Our friends of Europe could not disagree that the documents and
opinions of the European Commission were highly detached from
the policy and positions of the leading European states, in the
result of which the European Union was not ready to cope with these
developments. Among the existing controversies the countries of Europe
were skeptical about expansion of association with the countries of
Eastern Europe.
This is a studied and apprehensible issue but it need not be
overestimated. The European Union has officially approved this policy
and was ready to develop these relations consistently, as well as
finance different projects. In such a huge political structure as the
European Union there are always controversies but as to the Eastern
Partnership project, now there are favorable conditions for their
implementation if we do not take into account geopolitical conditions.
Is coordination of the activities of the United States and the
European Union on the destiny of Armenia possible? There were no more
or less substantial negotiations on this and they will hardly ever
take place. However, there was an exchange of opinions and points
of view. First of all, partnership with the current leadership of
Armenia is ruled out. Therefore, one can conclude that the political
leadership of Armenia is doomed to follow Russia's directions under
any condition all the way through.
No more or less apprehensible proposals have been received from
Armenia's political circles, and it was crucial to making the final
decision on Armenia. The United States is making efforts to correct
geopolitical realities in the region, and Armenia, despite its current
situation, is viewed as an element of a future system, more exactly
a system that is under construction now. This is a strange attitude
to the reality but there is no need to forget that the world centers
of power are such until they generate a new reality.
It is believed that the United States bewares the political marsh of
Europe, including Eastern Europe. The United States is undertaking
more large-scale plans of isolation and blockade of Russia with the
help of different approaches and developments in the regions. For the
United States, Armenia remains an interesting polygon of accomplishment
of the new geopolitical configuration of the region.
The decision of the Western community on the "secondary filtration" of
the civil society in Armenia seems belated but new active groups may
emerge in the result of these initiatives. The European governments
receive information that a new wave of social activeness awaits
Armenia, and the West may react toughly to the activities of the
government. Most probably, there is not a detailed plan but it may
occur and be implemented.
What approach will the West have towards Armenia? It is obvious -
leveling the decisions of the Armenian political leadership. In
other words, it means deterioration of Armenia, an experiment of
neutralization of its development and international isolation. Neither
the United States, nor Europe has any problems with Armenia and the
Armenian society despite its complete disorientation. The problem is
the government's being a subject.
Now nationalism - the old ideology "banned" by liberal democracy
- will return to the arena of Eastern Europe. Unfortunately, no
information is allowed out of Ukraine but political patriotism and
nationalism is strengthening there, which has a radically anti-Russian
character. The Western community understands that in this situation
it must support the nationalism of nations which are forced to join
the empire. In this game search for more radical nationalists, as
well as participants of the national liberation movement is underway.
No doubt Russia will support the government of Armenia, supplying it
with military equipment and trying at the same time to restructure
their relations so as not to lose a dollar in regard to Armenia over
a more or less visible period of time (5-7 years). In other words,
this is another device of blockade. Hence, double blockade is taking
place but it is the first round.
In this situation the Armenian patriots must think on what they
could do for the sake of liberation of the homeland from Russian
colonialism. Nobody except them will fulfill this task.
Igor Muradyan 22:14 25/12/2013 Story from Lragir.am News:
http://www.lragir.am/index/eng/0/comments/view/31635
Second Round of Blockade
No matter how good the quality of political analysis is, realistic
information is irreplaceable and is always valuable. One way or
another, our friends of Europe answer complicated and delicate
questions the answers to which are usually more multifold than to the
problems that are in the focus of global events. One has to admit that
"September 3" is so strange that it would be wrong to ignore such a
category as "insult". It is hard not to take into account these moods
that are not easy to veil but apparently will have to be veiled in the
framework of a more or less general review of the factor of "insult"
to Armenia as an essential factor.
However, "insult" in this case looks quite politicized, which means
that Serzh Sargsyan and his team are no longer partners of Europe
and the United States, and the Armenian president merely ensures
appearance of wellbeing in foreign policy. The Europeans have already
managed to react to this act of the Armenian president through the
decision of the European court on the denial of the genocide which
was a shock for the Armenian community in Europe.
Funding of reform programs affirmed earlier cannot indicate anything
regarding the policy of the European Union. These are trifles. There
are more significant circumstances. At least, two divisions of the
EU's external service have conveyed to the European Commission their
visions on Armenia. It is believed that there can be no proposals
on behalf of Armenia because the Armenian government is not capable
of any behavior that requires minimum sovereignty. On the eve of
"September 3" the EU officials got in touch with the representatives
of Armenia and they relayed to their leadership reassuring messages
so their professional situation is now quite complicated.
Our friends of Europe could not disagree that the documents and
opinions of the European Commission were highly detached from
the policy and positions of the leading European states, in the
result of which the European Union was not ready to cope with these
developments. Among the existing controversies the countries of Europe
were skeptical about expansion of association with the countries of
Eastern Europe.
This is a studied and apprehensible issue but it need not be
overestimated. The European Union has officially approved this policy
and was ready to develop these relations consistently, as well as
finance different projects. In such a huge political structure as the
European Union there are always controversies but as to the Eastern
Partnership project, now there are favorable conditions for their
implementation if we do not take into account geopolitical conditions.
Is coordination of the activities of the United States and the
European Union on the destiny of Armenia possible? There were no more
or less substantial negotiations on this and they will hardly ever
take place. However, there was an exchange of opinions and points
of view. First of all, partnership with the current leadership of
Armenia is ruled out. Therefore, one can conclude that the political
leadership of Armenia is doomed to follow Russia's directions under
any condition all the way through.
No more or less apprehensible proposals have been received from
Armenia's political circles, and it was crucial to making the final
decision on Armenia. The United States is making efforts to correct
geopolitical realities in the region, and Armenia, despite its current
situation, is viewed as an element of a future system, more exactly
a system that is under construction now. This is a strange attitude
to the reality but there is no need to forget that the world centers
of power are such until they generate a new reality.
It is believed that the United States bewares the political marsh of
Europe, including Eastern Europe. The United States is undertaking
more large-scale plans of isolation and blockade of Russia with the
help of different approaches and developments in the regions. For the
United States, Armenia remains an interesting polygon of accomplishment
of the new geopolitical configuration of the region.
The decision of the Western community on the "secondary filtration" of
the civil society in Armenia seems belated but new active groups may
emerge in the result of these initiatives. The European governments
receive information that a new wave of social activeness awaits
Armenia, and the West may react toughly to the activities of the
government. Most probably, there is not a detailed plan but it may
occur and be implemented.
What approach will the West have towards Armenia? It is obvious -
leveling the decisions of the Armenian political leadership. In
other words, it means deterioration of Armenia, an experiment of
neutralization of its development and international isolation. Neither
the United States, nor Europe has any problems with Armenia and the
Armenian society despite its complete disorientation. The problem is
the government's being a subject.
Now nationalism - the old ideology "banned" by liberal democracy
- will return to the arena of Eastern Europe. Unfortunately, no
information is allowed out of Ukraine but political patriotism and
nationalism is strengthening there, which has a radically anti-Russian
character. The Western community understands that in this situation
it must support the nationalism of nations which are forced to join
the empire. In this game search for more radical nationalists, as
well as participants of the national liberation movement is underway.
No doubt Russia will support the government of Armenia, supplying it
with military equipment and trying at the same time to restructure
their relations so as not to lose a dollar in regard to Armenia over
a more or less visible period of time (5-7 years). In other words,
this is another device of blockade. Hence, double blockade is taking
place but it is the first round.
In this situation the Armenian patriots must think on what they
could do for the sake of liberation of the homeland from Russian
colonialism. Nobody except them will fulfill this task.
Igor Muradyan 22:14 25/12/2013 Story from Lragir.am News:
http://www.lragir.am/index/eng/0/comments/view/31635