Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

New Trial On Armenian Genocide Museum Nixed

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • New Trial On Armenian Genocide Museum Nixed

    NEW TRIAL ON ARMENIAN GENOCIDE MUSEUM NIXED

    Courthouse News
    Feb 22 2013

    By MATT REYNOLDS

    (CN) - The protracted dispute over an Armenian Genocide museum and
    memorial project that never got off the ground should not face a new
    trial, a federal judge ruled.

    The consolidated complaint had pitted the Armenian Assembly of America
    and the Armenian Genocide Museum & Memorial against two former board
    members, Gerard Cafesjian and John Waters, and the Cafesjian Family
    Foundation.

    Their struggle for control of the museum, and allegations over its
    demise, stemmed from rising tensions between Cafesjian and Hirair
    Hovnanian, both of whom collaborated on the project in the late 1990s.

    "The parties, through the three consolidated actions pending before the
    court, have spent as much if not more time litigating who is to blame
    for the museum's failure as they spent attempting to make the museum
    a reality," U.S. District Judge Colleen Kollar-Kotelly wrote Wednesday.

    Cafesjian, a founding member of the museum's board of trustees, helped
    purchase the museum site, a vacant National Bank building at 14th and G
    Street in downtown Washington, D.C. He stepped back, however, after the
    board later failed to reach consensus on how to complete the museum.

    The Brooklyn-born philanthropist handpicked Waters, his right-hand
    man, to succeed him, but the board excluded Waters from further
    participation in the project after Cafesjian sued the assembly for
    payment of an unpaid promissory note.

    Kollar-Kotelly largely dismissed the series of claims and counterclaims
    after a 12-day bench trial in November 2010.

    In that January 2011 final judgment, Kollar-Kotelly found that
    neither Cafesijan nor Waters had breached their fiduciary duties to
    the assembly. She also cleared Cafesijian of bad faith claims and
    said neither he nor Waters had misappropriated the trade secrets of
    the assembly.

    Nearly a year later, the assembly and the museum moved for a new trial
    based on the alleged perjury of Waters. They said Waters had never
    mentioned that Cafesjian agreed to award him a bonus and reimburse
    his expenses if Cafesjian prevailed in the litigation.

    The motion relied on claims and counterclaims pending before a federal
    judge in Minnesota where Waters sued Cafesjian for more than $4.3
    million in deferred compensation, $1.2 million in bonuses and more
    than $500,000 in legal costs.

    Cafesjian countered that Waters had embezzled several million dollars
    from him over a period spanning more than a decade.

    Refusing to order a new trial in Washington this week, Judge
    Kollar-Kotelly said the assembly had a "full and fair opportunity to
    present their case during the bench trial."

    "The plaintiffs fail to show by clear and convincing evidence that
    Waters committed perjury or otherwise committed fraud or misconduct
    by not disclosing the compensation purportedly owed and/or promised
    by Cafesjian," the 33-page opinion states. "The court did not rely
    on Waters' credibility in rejecting the plaintiffs' claims at trial,
    meaning the plaintiffs cannot show actual prejudice from any alleged
    perjury or other misconduct by Waters," wrote Kollar-Kotelly.

    "The plaintiffs fail to show by clear and convincing evidence that
    Cafesjian actually promised Waters the litigation bonus, and in
    any case the existence of the agreement would not alter the legal
    conclusion that the defendants did not breach any duty by filing the
    initial suit in this litigation."

    In Minnesota, Waters alleged that Cafesijan had destroyed documents
    from Waters' former office at Cafesijan's GLC Enterprises.

    Though the assembly claimed "without elaboration" that the allegations
    directly impacted the trial, it failed "to show by clear and convincing
    evidence that the defendants destroyed documents relevant to this
    litigation or otherwise engaged in discovery misconduct sufficient
    to set aside the final judgment," Kollar-Kotelly wrote.

    By some estimates 1.5 million minority Armenians were killed by the
    Ottoman government during and after World War I. Regarded by some as
    the first genocide of modern times, male Armenians were slaughtered
    in what is now the Republic of Turkey, while women, children, the
    elderly and sick were deported or forced on "death marches" through
    the Syrian Desert.

    http://www.courthousenews.com/2013/02/22/55103.htm

Working...
X