Tweet
BUDAGHIAN'S LAWYER APPEALS AGAINST DECISION OF INVESTIGATION SERVICE
Wednesday,
July 03
The Investigation Service of Armenian Defense Ministry on June 24
postponed the examination of a petition for recognizing Colonel Artak
Budaghian as an aggrieved person. Let us remind you that Colonel
Budaghian, who is a military unit's commander in Nagorno Karabakh,
was wounded in the June 1 shootout near the house of former Synuik
regional governor Suren Khachatrian in Goris. Senior officer of the
Investigation Service Mary Sargsyan told Pastinfo news agency that
the mentioned decision does not mean that charges will be brought
against Budaghian.
Artak Budaghian's lawyer, Hayk Alumian, appealed to the Prosecutor
General's Office against the decision of the Defense Ministry's
Investigation Service.
According to the lawyer, the reason for appealing to the Prosecutor
General's Office against the decision is that he considers it
ineffective to apply to the Military Prosecutor who "has already
expressed his opinion about the investigator's decision".
It should be mentioned that Artak Budaghian is still considered a
witness in the case.
02.07.2013, 18:44
Aysor.am
From: A. Papazian
Wednesday,
July 03
The Investigation Service of Armenian Defense Ministry on June 24
postponed the examination of a petition for recognizing Colonel Artak
Budaghian as an aggrieved person. Let us remind you that Colonel
Budaghian, who is a military unit's commander in Nagorno Karabakh,
was wounded in the June 1 shootout near the house of former Synuik
regional governor Suren Khachatrian in Goris. Senior officer of the
Investigation Service Mary Sargsyan told Pastinfo news agency that
the mentioned decision does not mean that charges will be brought
against Budaghian.
Artak Budaghian's lawyer, Hayk Alumian, appealed to the Prosecutor
General's Office against the decision of the Defense Ministry's
Investigation Service.
According to the lawyer, the reason for appealing to the Prosecutor
General's Office against the decision is that he considers it
ineffective to apply to the Military Prosecutor who "has already
expressed his opinion about the investigator's decision".
It should be mentioned that Artak Budaghian is still considered a
witness in the case.
02.07.2013, 18:44
Aysor.am
From: A. Papazian