Tweet
DIVIDE INTO TWO HALVES
(http://en.aravot.am/2013/07/04/155222/)
The second President of Armenia sometimes says true things. For
example, once to my question what would you say about complaints of
businessmen regarding the tax pressures, he advised to divide both the
appeals and justifications of tax bodies in two halves and to combine
two true halves of different "sources" together, thus getting the
true picture. Now, I recommend applying the same methodology towards
the Control Chamber and accusations of the Deputies on the one hand
and towards the government justifications on the other hand.
Those who have a political interest in the events, tend to accept
the desired for real, "new cracks appear on the pyramid of power",
"mid-clan fight is aggravated," and so on. I have read in a few places,
namely, that the NA President stands behind all these, and that he
is preparing a kind of conspiracy or coup. Those who think like this
are either naive, or are unaware of, or (which is more likely) are
involved in 'mutilations". Armenia, as well as Russia, is a country
of "power statehood" (by the way, I have not heard that, let's say,
the supervisors or the Ministers of FBI in the United States, CIA
or Defense are called "power"). The coups are carried out by those
who have power, as it happened in Russia in 1991 (unsuccessful),
or in 1998 in Armenia (successful). Ay, if Seyran Ohanyan, Vladimir
Gasparyan or Gorik Hakobyan start to be involved in politics, be aware
that a plot, a coup is possible. Hovik Abrahamyan neither personally,
nor by ex officio is capable of such things.
The discussion of issues (both offshore scandal and the CC report)
remains. It is a positive phenomenon by itself, who said that the
Parliament and the Government, MPs and Ministers should coo like
pigeons from morning till evening. It is desirable not to be like
that, they should always be in dispute with each other, balancing
each other. It is also desirable that the parliamentary majority does
not have the opportunity to approve the government's decrees alone,
as it is, unfortunately, in Armenia. It would be much better that not
only the Republican delegates and te Republican Minister take part in
these discussions, but the representatives of the opposition and the
"alternative". But we have what we have, it is even better to discuss
possible abuses of the Executive under this conditions or to remain
silent about them.
In fact, the MPs in the all the countries are required to be more
"populist" than the ministers. Because the MPs are elected or, at
least, should be selected, and the Ministers are appointed. Of course,
it would be the best that the MPs are really elected in Armenia.
From: Emil Lazarian | Ararat NewsPress
(http://en.aravot.am/2013/07/04/155222/)
The second President of Armenia sometimes says true things. For
example, once to my question what would you say about complaints of
businessmen regarding the tax pressures, he advised to divide both the
appeals and justifications of tax bodies in two halves and to combine
two true halves of different "sources" together, thus getting the
true picture. Now, I recommend applying the same methodology towards
the Control Chamber and accusations of the Deputies on the one hand
and towards the government justifications on the other hand.
Those who have a political interest in the events, tend to accept
the desired for real, "new cracks appear on the pyramid of power",
"mid-clan fight is aggravated," and so on. I have read in a few places,
namely, that the NA President stands behind all these, and that he
is preparing a kind of conspiracy or coup. Those who think like this
are either naive, or are unaware of, or (which is more likely) are
involved in 'mutilations". Armenia, as well as Russia, is a country
of "power statehood" (by the way, I have not heard that, let's say,
the supervisors or the Ministers of FBI in the United States, CIA
or Defense are called "power"). The coups are carried out by those
who have power, as it happened in Russia in 1991 (unsuccessful),
or in 1998 in Armenia (successful). Ay, if Seyran Ohanyan, Vladimir
Gasparyan or Gorik Hakobyan start to be involved in politics, be aware
that a plot, a coup is possible. Hovik Abrahamyan neither personally,
nor by ex officio is capable of such things.
The discussion of issues (both offshore scandal and the CC report)
remains. It is a positive phenomenon by itself, who said that the
Parliament and the Government, MPs and Ministers should coo like
pigeons from morning till evening. It is desirable not to be like
that, they should always be in dispute with each other, balancing
each other. It is also desirable that the parliamentary majority does
not have the opportunity to approve the government's decrees alone,
as it is, unfortunately, in Armenia. It would be much better that not
only the Republican delegates and te Republican Minister take part in
these discussions, but the representatives of the opposition and the
"alternative". But we have what we have, it is even better to discuss
possible abuses of the Executive under this conditions or to remain
silent about them.
In fact, the MPs in the all the countries are required to be more
"populist" than the ministers. Because the MPs are elected or, at
least, should be selected, and the Ministers are appointed. Of course,
it would be the best that the MPs are really elected in Armenia.
From: Emil Lazarian | Ararat NewsPress