MOLDOVAN EXPERTS DENOUNCE GRIGORIU'S STATEMENTS IN YEREVAN
Tuesday,
July 09
Moldovan experts believe that Moldovan Ombudswoman Aurelia Grigoriu's
Yerevan speech that caused a scandal was a serious mistake, according
to Publika.md.
"The speech digressed from human rights and a serious conclusion
aimed against Armenia became its subject. It was a conclusion related
to bilateral relations between the two states," said Victor Zhuk,
Deputy Director of the Institute of Legal Studies of Moldova's Academy
of Sciences.
"This issue exceeds the authority of a parliamentary advocate, such
a style of expression is characteristic for politicians. Ombudsman
shall work with specific cases," the head of Moldovan human rights
organization CREDO Sergei Ostaf said.
"The sides, including Ms. Grigoriu, should consider this as an
incident and not a conflict. In this case there will be a result. But
if Ms. Grigoriu insists on her position, then the Republic of Moldova
will have to issue a statement and reject what was said," Had of the
Institute of European Studies Viorel Chibotaru said.
We would remind you that during the conference "The European Standards
of the Rule of Law and the Limits of Discretion of Powers in the
Council of Europe Member States" held in Yerevan on July 4, Moldova's
parliamentary advocate Aurelia Grigoriu made a pro-Azerbaijani speech
entitled "The Observance of Human Rights in Frozen Conflict Zones",
calling Armenia an "aggressor country".
Aurelia Grigoriu's statements have been already denounced by member
of Moldova's Constitutional Court Victor Popan who said a commission
will be set up in the Moldovan parliament to examine the statements
of Grigoriu.
In the words of the Moldovan parliament speaker Igor Korman, the
parliamentary committee on human rights will give an assessment of
Aurelia Grigoriu's words. "I said openly to the parliamentary advocates
that it was an outrage mistake and such mistakes must not be made".
TODAY, 13:50
Aysor.am
Tuesday,
July 09
Moldovan experts believe that Moldovan Ombudswoman Aurelia Grigoriu's
Yerevan speech that caused a scandal was a serious mistake, according
to Publika.md.
"The speech digressed from human rights and a serious conclusion
aimed against Armenia became its subject. It was a conclusion related
to bilateral relations between the two states," said Victor Zhuk,
Deputy Director of the Institute of Legal Studies of Moldova's Academy
of Sciences.
"This issue exceeds the authority of a parliamentary advocate, such
a style of expression is characteristic for politicians. Ombudsman
shall work with specific cases," the head of Moldovan human rights
organization CREDO Sergei Ostaf said.
"The sides, including Ms. Grigoriu, should consider this as an
incident and not a conflict. In this case there will be a result. But
if Ms. Grigoriu insists on her position, then the Republic of Moldova
will have to issue a statement and reject what was said," Had of the
Institute of European Studies Viorel Chibotaru said.
We would remind you that during the conference "The European Standards
of the Rule of Law and the Limits of Discretion of Powers in the
Council of Europe Member States" held in Yerevan on July 4, Moldova's
parliamentary advocate Aurelia Grigoriu made a pro-Azerbaijani speech
entitled "The Observance of Human Rights in Frozen Conflict Zones",
calling Armenia an "aggressor country".
Aurelia Grigoriu's statements have been already denounced by member
of Moldova's Constitutional Court Victor Popan who said a commission
will be set up in the Moldovan parliament to examine the statements
of Grigoriu.
In the words of the Moldovan parliament speaker Igor Korman, the
parliamentary committee on human rights will give an assessment of
Aurelia Grigoriu's words. "I said openly to the parliamentary advocates
that it was an outrage mistake and such mistakes must not be made".
TODAY, 13:50
Aysor.am