Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Turkey's Kurdish Party Fights For Preservation Of Armenian Houses

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Turkey's Kurdish Party Fights For Preservation Of Armenian Houses

    TURKEY'S KURDISH PARTY FIGHTS FOR PRESERVATION OF ARMENIAN HOUSES

    [ Part 2.2: "Attached Text" ]

    http://armenpress.am/eng/news/726995/turkey%E2%80%99s-kurdish-party-fights-for-preservation-of-armenian-houses.html
    12:17, 23 July, 2013

    YEREVAN, JULY 23, ARMNEPRESS: The only Kurdish Party in the Turkey's
    Parliament "Peace and Democracy" has launched a struggle against
    the demolition of the Armenian houses in the MuĊ~_ Province. As
    reported by Armenpress, quoting the Turkish Taraf Periodical, the
    Van Preservation Regional Council has started the study of the Kale
    District of MuĊ~_ Province. It is mentioned that, if in the result of
    the study the Armenian houses are announced to be cultural heritage,
    they will be taken under special care.

    The MuĊ~_ Deputy of the "Peace and Democracy" Party Demir Celik stated
    with pain that though the Van Preservation Regional Council is still
    implementing the study, the MuĊ~_ Municipality, without waiting for
    the decision of the Council, has already begun the demolition of
    the houses.

    "During the last visit to MuĊ~_ we saw unfortunately that about
    the 60% of the 300 historical buildings of the region had been
    destructed. The devastation of the centuries-old history of our city
    is unacceptable. Was the Genocide of 1915 not enough? The devastation
    of the tracks of the Armenians again brings the rights issue of the
    people, who suffered the Genocide, into the agenda", - said Demir
    Celik, stating that they would not stop the struggle.

    In the framework of the urban renewal project the Housing Development
    Administration of Turkey (TOKI) intends to build 864 residential
    houses and 107 offices in the place of the Armenian houses in the
    Kale District of MuĊ~_. The TOKI has agreed with the 85% of the local
    population to carry out the reconstruction works on the territory of
    about 60,000 square meters.

    Many of the local population, living in the Kale District of
    MuĊ~_ Province, refuse to take the money suggested by the Housing
    Development Administration of Turkey and leave their houses. The
    TOKI representatives announced that in any case they will demolish
    the houses and if the population does not leave voluntarily, their
    goods as well will remain under ruins.

    An electronic signature collection has been organized against the
    demolition of the historical Armenian houses in the MuĊ~_ Province,
    the initiators of which appealed to join them and prohibit the
    devastation of the last Armenian historical tracks in MuĊ~_.

    "Armenians, Greeks and Assyrians are being subjected to genocide. The
    process, launched by the genocide in 1915, is currently continuing
    as a cultural and economic genocide. To kill a culture means to kill
    the mankind. It is a historical genocide", - says the statement.

    The confiscation of properties of minority foundations dates back to
    the early days of the Turkish Republic. The 1936 Law on Foundations,
    known as the 1936 Declaration, ordered all foundations to submit a
    property declaration listing immovable and other properties owned by
    each and every foundation. Following the death of the nation's founder
    Mustafa Kemal Ataturk, those property declarations were forgotten.

    When the Cyprus problem escalated in the 1970s, the General
    Directorate of Foundations asked non-Muslim foundations to resubmit
    their regulations. Yet those foundations did not have such regulations
    because of a practice during the Ottoman Empire where such foundations
    could only be established by individual decrees of the sultan of the
    day. After receiving a negative response from these foundations, the
    General Directorate of Foundations made a ruling that the declarations
    of 1936 would be considered their regulation. Unless these declarations
    did not carry a special provision entitling the foundation to acquire
    immovable property, the General Directorate expropriated all immovable
    property acquired after 1936.These expropriation acts were in violation
    of both the Lausanne agreement and property rights.

Working...
X