Tweet
ANOTHER FALSIFICATION WILL ADD TO INSTINCT OF STEALING AND ENJOYMENT
In Armenia one can often hear the idea that the signing of the
Association Agreement with the EU should not be the single-handed
decision of the government but a referendum must be held. For example,
the ex-prime minister of Armenia Hrant Bagratyan expressed such
an opinion.
Because an issue is considered which is essential to further progress
of the state and society and which is actually a step of orientation,
a referendum is the best solution indeed.
However, solutions may be wonderful in theory but one must be aware
of the environment where they will be applied.
Armenia has an experience of holding referendums. There were two
referendums on the Constitution. And the society has doubts about
both. Whether elections or referendum, they all have been falsified
since 1995. There is no doubt that the possible referendum on
association with the EU would also be falsified.
Moreover, not only voting but also discussion is falsified in Armenia.
Evidence is the six-week public discussion of the Armenian-Turkish
protocols. The impression produced by their official propaganda
was that the entire society and progressive Armenians said yes to
the Armenian-Turkish protocols except some nihilists in Armenia and
the Diaspora.
Yes but let's leave aside falsification. The general atmosphere where
the discussion or voting will pass is false. I wonder what the attitude
of the society to Europe is. A lot of people dream of travelling to
Europe to enjoy or to steal or to steal and enjoy stealing. However,
the association with the EU is a job, not stealing or enjoyment,
whether in Armenia or in Europe.
Which part of Armenia is ready to do this work? Which part is
ready to work on themselves or make the government work towards the
opportunities that will be opened up by association to favor the state,
not specific people and groups.
With its life and legal consciousness the Armenian society remains
in the Asian orbit with a soviet Russian packaging. In other words,
the perception of Europe in this society has been false from the
beginning, deep at the subconscious level and the level of instincts.
This society thinks: "Only the Russians need us." This thinking is
dominant, at least a slight propaganda manipulation is enough to
produce a negative result of the referendum.
Only falsifying will be left for Armenia to proceed along the way of
having a new prospect of developments with the help of association
with the EU. In this case, it is better to obey Russia's plans
and lose sovereignty without another falsified voting or sign the
Association Agreement without any referendum, without consideration
of the natural and artificial phobias of the public majority. One
falsification more, one falsification less will not bring anything
to Armenia and its society.
Hakob Badalyan 17:31 30/07/2013 Story from Lragir.am News:
http://www.lragir.am/index/eng/0/comments/view/30588
In Armenia one can often hear the idea that the signing of the
Association Agreement with the EU should not be the single-handed
decision of the government but a referendum must be held. For example,
the ex-prime minister of Armenia Hrant Bagratyan expressed such
an opinion.
Because an issue is considered which is essential to further progress
of the state and society and which is actually a step of orientation,
a referendum is the best solution indeed.
However, solutions may be wonderful in theory but one must be aware
of the environment where they will be applied.
Armenia has an experience of holding referendums. There were two
referendums on the Constitution. And the society has doubts about
both. Whether elections or referendum, they all have been falsified
since 1995. There is no doubt that the possible referendum on
association with the EU would also be falsified.
Moreover, not only voting but also discussion is falsified in Armenia.
Evidence is the six-week public discussion of the Armenian-Turkish
protocols. The impression produced by their official propaganda
was that the entire society and progressive Armenians said yes to
the Armenian-Turkish protocols except some nihilists in Armenia and
the Diaspora.
Yes but let's leave aside falsification. The general atmosphere where
the discussion or voting will pass is false. I wonder what the attitude
of the society to Europe is. A lot of people dream of travelling to
Europe to enjoy or to steal or to steal and enjoy stealing. However,
the association with the EU is a job, not stealing or enjoyment,
whether in Armenia or in Europe.
Which part of Armenia is ready to do this work? Which part is
ready to work on themselves or make the government work towards the
opportunities that will be opened up by association to favor the state,
not specific people and groups.
With its life and legal consciousness the Armenian society remains
in the Asian orbit with a soviet Russian packaging. In other words,
the perception of Europe in this society has been false from the
beginning, deep at the subconscious level and the level of instincts.
This society thinks: "Only the Russians need us." This thinking is
dominant, at least a slight propaganda manipulation is enough to
produce a negative result of the referendum.
Only falsifying will be left for Armenia to proceed along the way of
having a new prospect of developments with the help of association
with the EU. In this case, it is better to obey Russia's plans
and lose sovereignty without another falsified voting or sign the
Association Agreement without any referendum, without consideration
of the natural and artificial phobias of the public majority. One
falsification more, one falsification less will not bring anything
to Armenia and its society.
Hakob Badalyan 17:31 30/07/2013 Story from Lragir.am News:
http://www.lragir.am/index/eng/0/comments/view/30588