Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Perspectives Of Sunnite Caliphate

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Perspectives Of Sunnite Caliphate

    PERSPECTIVES OF SUNNITE CALIPHATE

    Apparently the factors and arguments for the reproduction of a certain
    pseudo-imperial formation in Eurasian around Russia or actually Russia
    have worn out, and now the last haven for the Moscow imperialism is
    the Sunnite caliphate as a threat to many countries and peoples. But
    how serious are the arguments about the Sunnite caliphate, especially
    under the aegis of the United States?

    The Huntington doctrine on the fight of civilizations encountered an
    irresistible and omnipresent thing - a severe struggle among certain
    civilizations. This is taking place in the Catholic and Orthodox
    worlds, a fatal fight is going on between the Sunnites and Shiites
    which distracts mostly Sunnite states from national interests.

    However, the major fight for recarving of borders and layout of
    geopolitical configuration is taking place in the Sunnite world
    and space.

    Dreaming of the role of the Sunnite world leader, Turkey faced
    ambiguous events and openly hostile attitude of leaders and outsiders
    of Sunni Arab states. Sunnite Arab states are still having acute
    controversies (sometimes in a sleeping mode). Look at Central Asia.

    There are no Shiites, Christians, Buddhists, Confucians, countries
    and people with common languages and cultures are torn by hostility.

    Some Sunnite states still face conflicts among clans and tribes
    which expose territorial integrity of some states. Certain projects
    of leading Sunnite states of Saudi Arabia, Turkey and Pakistan, such
    as those in Bosnia or Iraq, do not get assistance and support because
    most outposts of the "caliphate" would like to keep to completely
    different geopolitical and socio-cultural aspects. These projects are
    rather relating to national ambitions of these leading states rather
    than the idea of caliphate.

    In addition, the United States is carrying out a total policy of
    division, fragmentation and formatting of giant spaces. In addition,
    the current U.S. doctrine is determined by the lack of means and
    levers of influence rather than their strength. The partners of
    the United States in the Near East, including Israel, have already
    understood this.

    The establishment of a Sunnite caliphate under the aegis of the
    United States is one of the propaganda-oriented scenarios, which is
    wholly fiction. The promoters of this scenario have not answered the
    question why the Americans would need to do this. Or is the United
    States making the next fatal mistake?

    The United States is using occasional conflicts and ambitions of
    Sunnite elites to resolve local and complex geopolitical issues. There
    is no doubt that Washington's official statements state the goals and
    objectives of the United States differently but which state is more
    honest? The global goal of the United States is not an integrated
    but a fragmental state, prevention of strengthening global centers of
    force, even in regard to their partners. Separate clusters of Sunnite
    radicalism are activated in each geopolitical aspect, not the idea of
    "caliphate".

    Let us assume that Russia will be designated or will choose the
    role of saving someone from the caliphate. Which countries will
    appear under its control, the countries of the Sunnite area? So,
    what is awaiting Russia - a lasting war with the Caliphate on its
    own territory or the territory its holds under control? Following the
    insolent and mercantile behavior of Moscow, a real den, it is hard to
    imagine that it would be ready for such large-scale resistance. The
    Russian elites would like to be Americanized and prefer not to fly
    the Russian civil aviation planes while their children study at the
    universities of North America and Europe.

    There are threats and risks and they are well-identified, and
    specifically and professionally stated agreements between current and
    potential partners are needed to eliminate those threats rather than
    unsuccessful propaganda flying somewhere in the clouds. Modern Russia
    is still a young power because it does not have sufficient experience
    of strategic and tactical studies. All the 22 years of independent
    existence of Russia is all faults, failures and deliberate betrayals
    in foreign policy.

    Now the ruling elite has apparently decided that in-house problems
    have been resolved, and it is time to deal with outer space. Not bad!

    However, it needs to be solid, taking into account the realities but
    not take their fantasy for reality and in addition to this mislead
    their "brother" nations. Apparently, it is allowed to gag their
    society but not their brotherly nations.

    Calls are made to make a choice between the British approach of
    interests or the Russian approach of brotherhood. How about us? What
    have we been doing over the past 23 years? Have we been engaged in
    brotherhood which turned out to be buddy-buddy and hangout in nature?

    In fact, any doctrine should first be tried out and adapted to
    the one's own national contingent before exporting it, furthermore
    combining it with elements of blatant blackmail.

    Igor Muradyan 18:08 04/06/2013 Story from Lragir.am News:
    http://www.lragir.am/index/eng/0/comments/view/30035

Working...
X