Tweet
LET'S KEEP THE CAMERAS ON THEM
June 5 2013
"Hey, listen, it's enough to keep cameras on us, you drank our blood."
As you guess, a humble laborer of the land, a violinist of a symphonic
orchestra or a junior scientific worker can not talk like this. The
"bodyguard" of "Harsnaqar" restaurant Garik Markaryan speaks like
that, who is sitting in the chair of the defendant and accuses the
visitors to the restaurant for a brutality and sadism beating, so
that one of them had died. When they attacked people with their pack
and tortured them, the "bodyguards 'and waiters would probably not
realized that they will be answering before the law, and the cameras
will be focused on them. Thus, people who are accused for shedding
blood, instead of burning with shame, blame the journalists for
taking pictures and thus for "drinking their blood". And the mother,
who brought up such a "glorious" son dishonors the reporter covering
the trial. I am absolutely not going to insist that the reporters are
right under all circumstances. In all disputable cases, I am only
defending the reporters to whom I have no doubts concerning their
discreet, decent and professional conduct. This is precisely the case.
In general, I think that from the prospective of society benefits,
even disputable cases (excluding personal), it is more appropriate
that the reporters focus their attention on this or that phenomenon
rather than to hide the phenomenon or the event. More the trial in
"Harsnaqar" is covered, less is likelihood that those responsible for
a brutal beating and killing will get their deserved punishment. More
we remember the criminal of the neighborhood impeding the reporters
during the elections, less the characters, including "Turbo" will
have the chance to hide themselves in their concealments. More we
write about shootings in Gyumri or Goris, more the obscenity of local
'princelings' will be limited. Whenever we become less consistent,
tired, forgetting, etc., the government finds the opportunity to
'conceal' the cases. The same refers to the issue that was raised
by our colleagues from "Hetq". It refers to the document, according
to which the Prime Minister Tigran Sargsyan and the Ararat Diocese
Archbishop Navasard Kchoyan were correlated to the enterprise
registered at the offshore zone and created obstacles in the business
of another businessman. Whether the information is accurate or
not, I do not know. The Prime Minister, however, has applied to the
Prosecutor's Office. But if we are not interested in what happened to
the application on daily base, the prosecution is very likely to 'hide'
the case. So, dear colleagues, when the officials, their "bodyguards"
and, which is almost the same, the "neighborhood thugs' say 'take
your camera away from here", do not listen to them. Aram ABRAHAMYAN
Read more at: http://en.aravot.am/2013/06/05/154674/
© 1998 - 2013 Aravot - News from Armenia
June 5 2013
"Hey, listen, it's enough to keep cameras on us, you drank our blood."
As you guess, a humble laborer of the land, a violinist of a symphonic
orchestra or a junior scientific worker can not talk like this. The
"bodyguard" of "Harsnaqar" restaurant Garik Markaryan speaks like
that, who is sitting in the chair of the defendant and accuses the
visitors to the restaurant for a brutality and sadism beating, so
that one of them had died. When they attacked people with their pack
and tortured them, the "bodyguards 'and waiters would probably not
realized that they will be answering before the law, and the cameras
will be focused on them. Thus, people who are accused for shedding
blood, instead of burning with shame, blame the journalists for
taking pictures and thus for "drinking their blood". And the mother,
who brought up such a "glorious" son dishonors the reporter covering
the trial. I am absolutely not going to insist that the reporters are
right under all circumstances. In all disputable cases, I am only
defending the reporters to whom I have no doubts concerning their
discreet, decent and professional conduct. This is precisely the case.
In general, I think that from the prospective of society benefits,
even disputable cases (excluding personal), it is more appropriate
that the reporters focus their attention on this or that phenomenon
rather than to hide the phenomenon or the event. More the trial in
"Harsnaqar" is covered, less is likelihood that those responsible for
a brutal beating and killing will get their deserved punishment. More
we remember the criminal of the neighborhood impeding the reporters
during the elections, less the characters, including "Turbo" will
have the chance to hide themselves in their concealments. More we
write about shootings in Gyumri or Goris, more the obscenity of local
'princelings' will be limited. Whenever we become less consistent,
tired, forgetting, etc., the government finds the opportunity to
'conceal' the cases. The same refers to the issue that was raised
by our colleagues from "Hetq". It refers to the document, according
to which the Prime Minister Tigran Sargsyan and the Ararat Diocese
Archbishop Navasard Kchoyan were correlated to the enterprise
registered at the offshore zone and created obstacles in the business
of another businessman. Whether the information is accurate or
not, I do not know. The Prime Minister, however, has applied to the
Prosecutor's Office. But if we are not interested in what happened to
the application on daily base, the prosecution is very likely to 'hide'
the case. So, dear colleagues, when the officials, their "bodyguards"
and, which is almost the same, the "neighborhood thugs' say 'take
your camera away from here", do not listen to them. Aram ABRAHAMYAN
Read more at: http://en.aravot.am/2013/06/05/154674/
© 1998 - 2013 Aravot - News from Armenia