Tweet
FOREIGN POLICY CRITICIZES USAID FOR PROVIDING MULTI-MILLION DOLLAR ASSETS TO ALIYEV'S AUTHORITARIAN REGIME
18:25 10/06/2013 " REGION
Since Azerbaijan achieved independence in 1991, the United States
Agency for International Development (USAID) has dumped more than $55
million into programs to make the country more democratic. Meanwhile,
the Aliyev family -- first father Heydar, then son Ilham -- has stayed
in power since 1993, the US paper "Foreign Policy" writes.
"The regime has jailed young people for making satirical videos,
tightened the rules governing civic organizations, imprisoned hundreds
of religious believers branded as "extremists," and failed to hold
a single election that met international standards," the article says.
But that hasn't kept USAID -- the development organization that
distributes more than 80 percent of U.S. democracy dollars -- from
trying. From 2007 to 2011, USAID spent $5.6 million attempting to
"enhance the overall effectiveness" of the parliament of Azerbaijan.
"The trouble is that parliament has never been freely elected. Every
single member of the legislature is a member of the ruling New
Azerbaijan Party. U.S. taxpayers paid for an orientation program
to "solidify [the parliament's] own sense of identity" for new
members of the Azerbaijani parliament, all of whom were elected
in 2010 parliamentary elections that the U.S. Embassy in Baku
generously described as "not meeting international standards." The
U.S. Embassy also cited an unfair candidate registration process,
continued restrictions on freedoms of assembly and expression, and a
lack of balanced media coverage during the run-up to the election,"
the article says.
The U.S. remains committed to a failing strategy. In August 2012,
USAID issued a $1.5 million call for the Azerbaijan Rights Consortium
Project.
"Why, then, does the U.S. government continue to fund misguided
programs in authoritarian and semi-authoritarian countries that display
no interest in reform? Why does USAID write seriously of President
Aliyev's benign intentions when he has shown minimal respect for the
rights of his own citizens? The reason is as banal as it is galling:
bureaucratic self-interest, inertia, and the assumption that more is
always better," the article writes.
Source: Panorama.am
18:25 10/06/2013 " REGION
Since Azerbaijan achieved independence in 1991, the United States
Agency for International Development (USAID) has dumped more than $55
million into programs to make the country more democratic. Meanwhile,
the Aliyev family -- first father Heydar, then son Ilham -- has stayed
in power since 1993, the US paper "Foreign Policy" writes.
"The regime has jailed young people for making satirical videos,
tightened the rules governing civic organizations, imprisoned hundreds
of religious believers branded as "extremists," and failed to hold
a single election that met international standards," the article says.
But that hasn't kept USAID -- the development organization that
distributes more than 80 percent of U.S. democracy dollars -- from
trying. From 2007 to 2011, USAID spent $5.6 million attempting to
"enhance the overall effectiveness" of the parliament of Azerbaijan.
"The trouble is that parliament has never been freely elected. Every
single member of the legislature is a member of the ruling New
Azerbaijan Party. U.S. taxpayers paid for an orientation program
to "solidify [the parliament's] own sense of identity" for new
members of the Azerbaijani parliament, all of whom were elected
in 2010 parliamentary elections that the U.S. Embassy in Baku
generously described as "not meeting international standards." The
U.S. Embassy also cited an unfair candidate registration process,
continued restrictions on freedoms of assembly and expression, and a
lack of balanced media coverage during the run-up to the election,"
the article says.
The U.S. remains committed to a failing strategy. In August 2012,
USAID issued a $1.5 million call for the Azerbaijan Rights Consortium
Project.
"Why, then, does the U.S. government continue to fund misguided
programs in authoritarian and semi-authoritarian countries that display
no interest in reform? Why does USAID write seriously of President
Aliyev's benign intentions when he has shown minimal respect for the
rights of his own citizens? The reason is as banal as it is galling:
bureaucratic self-interest, inertia, and the assumption that more is
always better," the article writes.
Source: Panorama.am