Tweet
FULLY CONTROLLED DEVELOPMENTS IN TURKEY
Opinions of experts who describe developments in Turkey as "foreign
influence combined with internal basic conditions" are just suggestions
made by intuition. It is crisp and clear that these developments
are controlled by the military with full agreement with the foreign
initiators.
The Western politicians and experts continue to claim that Turkey is
a loyal and reliable partner to NATO while the annoying and disturbing
ruling party in Turkey is absolutely unbearable.
Turkey is an important, if not the main factor of the crisis in NATO
and continues to enjoy the benefits of a NATO member, come up with
initiatives which are not acceptable for the Euro-Atlantic community.
In addition, Turkey has not gained any influence in Russia, China
and the Near East.
The new doctrine of foreign affairs ended up in a fiasco which
affected the current economic and consequently domestic situation. The
environment is convenient for the next revolution in the Islamic world,
and they availed themselves of it successfully.
Now one thing is clear - once they started, they will go all the way.
Or, to put it otherwise, they did not start to stop halfway. Yes,
Turkey is a strong country but were Egypt, Syria and Libya weak
states? (And what is a strong state in general?)
Erdogan is getting more and more isolated from the society and is
losing support. It is possible that the ruling regime will sacrifice
Erdogan to hold on to power with the help of compromise. Turkey
is expected to make a compromise over foreign policy rather than
domestic scrambles.
It is obvious that three scenarios of the collapse of Turkey are
played which are a factor of blackmail of the ruling elite. Those are
the left, left-liberal and right-conservative nationalistic projects.
These projects were drafted in the late 1950s, not now, and they
certainly encountered opposition.
All the three projects were directed at prevention of reinforcement
of the influence of Communists and the Soviet Union. The situation has
changed dramatically but the three projects have not become obsolete.
The role of the United States and Germany is stressed in the
implementation of these projects. It looks like illiterate because
there is a division of labor between the Americans and Europeans
regarding such projects. However, it is beyond doubt that such
developments are already used for limiting Turkey's foreign political
ambitions and reinforcing foreign control on Turkey.
Not only the United States but also the leading states of Europe
pursue these goals. Great Britain has already made some steps for
mapping the behavior of the West where Turkey is exposed to a real
risk of fragmentation. Apparently, neither the United States, nor
Europe were confused and were ready for such developments.
Turkey is facing the threat of emergence of three states: the
Thracian-Aegean Turkish Republic, the Turkish Republic of Anatolia,
the Confederation of Peoples of East Anatolia. The borders will run
along the location of the military bases and and infrastructures of
the United States and NATO.
The traditional game of reinforcing relations with Russia will not
save Turkey this time, and the West does not believe in such manifests
of Eurasian feelings. Neither does Russia which may act as the savior
of Syria but not Turkey. It has no reason for that.
A military conflict in which Turkey would participate or otherwise be
involved could be an important factor for the preservation of Turkey's
integrity, for example, Karabakh War II. So far Turkey has held out
hope for modest military victories in Syria within NATO forces but its
partners in the alliance took into account the Turkish game which would
become independent sooner or later. Syria was saved by the reluctance
of the United States and Europe to let the Near East go to Turkey.
Now the situation is different, and Turks can untie their hands because
they have nothing to lose. The situation has not been undone but it
is a matter of time.
Igor Muradyan 17:47 13/06/2013 Story from Lragir.am News:
http://www.lragir.am/index/eng/0/comments/view/30159
Opinions of experts who describe developments in Turkey as "foreign
influence combined with internal basic conditions" are just suggestions
made by intuition. It is crisp and clear that these developments
are controlled by the military with full agreement with the foreign
initiators.
The Western politicians and experts continue to claim that Turkey is
a loyal and reliable partner to NATO while the annoying and disturbing
ruling party in Turkey is absolutely unbearable.
Turkey is an important, if not the main factor of the crisis in NATO
and continues to enjoy the benefits of a NATO member, come up with
initiatives which are not acceptable for the Euro-Atlantic community.
In addition, Turkey has not gained any influence in Russia, China
and the Near East.
The new doctrine of foreign affairs ended up in a fiasco which
affected the current economic and consequently domestic situation. The
environment is convenient for the next revolution in the Islamic world,
and they availed themselves of it successfully.
Now one thing is clear - once they started, they will go all the way.
Or, to put it otherwise, they did not start to stop halfway. Yes,
Turkey is a strong country but were Egypt, Syria and Libya weak
states? (And what is a strong state in general?)
Erdogan is getting more and more isolated from the society and is
losing support. It is possible that the ruling regime will sacrifice
Erdogan to hold on to power with the help of compromise. Turkey
is expected to make a compromise over foreign policy rather than
domestic scrambles.
It is obvious that three scenarios of the collapse of Turkey are
played which are a factor of blackmail of the ruling elite. Those are
the left, left-liberal and right-conservative nationalistic projects.
These projects were drafted in the late 1950s, not now, and they
certainly encountered opposition.
All the three projects were directed at prevention of reinforcement
of the influence of Communists and the Soviet Union. The situation has
changed dramatically but the three projects have not become obsolete.
The role of the United States and Germany is stressed in the
implementation of these projects. It looks like illiterate because
there is a division of labor between the Americans and Europeans
regarding such projects. However, it is beyond doubt that such
developments are already used for limiting Turkey's foreign political
ambitions and reinforcing foreign control on Turkey.
Not only the United States but also the leading states of Europe
pursue these goals. Great Britain has already made some steps for
mapping the behavior of the West where Turkey is exposed to a real
risk of fragmentation. Apparently, neither the United States, nor
Europe were confused and were ready for such developments.
Turkey is facing the threat of emergence of three states: the
Thracian-Aegean Turkish Republic, the Turkish Republic of Anatolia,
the Confederation of Peoples of East Anatolia. The borders will run
along the location of the military bases and and infrastructures of
the United States and NATO.
The traditional game of reinforcing relations with Russia will not
save Turkey this time, and the West does not believe in such manifests
of Eurasian feelings. Neither does Russia which may act as the savior
of Syria but not Turkey. It has no reason for that.
A military conflict in which Turkey would participate or otherwise be
involved could be an important factor for the preservation of Turkey's
integrity, for example, Karabakh War II. So far Turkey has held out
hope for modest military victories in Syria within NATO forces but its
partners in the alliance took into account the Turkish game which would
become independent sooner or later. Syria was saved by the reluctance
of the United States and Europe to let the Near East go to Turkey.
Now the situation is different, and Turks can untie their hands because
they have nothing to lose. The situation has not been undone but it
is a matter of time.
Igor Muradyan 17:47 13/06/2013 Story from Lragir.am News:
http://www.lragir.am/index/eng/0/comments/view/30159